Look, just because they get around a lot doesn't mean they're hoars
southsamurai
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
It worked though!
Frankly, your entire "reasoning" makes you look weak and outright stupid.
Either that or you're so deep into the kink of cuckolding that you've forgotten that it isn't based on healthy relationship interactions, it's specifically diverging from them.
I have to assume so.
You are a nice asshole! So am I!
Southern Appalachians
The damn yankees don't realize that snow is different here. We tend to get mixed precipitation more, and even when the roads are prepared for cold weather, or can get stymied by the way we melt and freeze over time.
Snow ain't the same everywhere, and in this neck of the woods, it tends to hide shit you can't plan for.
I do not appreciate these pictures from our last in person session being leaked
Wait, wait, wait, you can not be pulling this shit!
Are you a flying squid or not?
Yeah! Dolly! And there's that knife shop!
So, Tennessee has bass pro, snow, Dolly, and knives!
What a great state!
Really? That's the kind of troll you're going to try and pull?
Like, I knew you were fucking around, but I figured maybe you'd be entertaining about it. That's just boring. You gotta step up your game
It's definitely a slow community :)
view more: next ›
I would say that a person born with a penis was probably assigned male at birth, within the context of a correct statement. The lack of a penis, at birth or afterwards, does not exclude manhood. Nor does the possession of one exclude womanhood.
It's one of those things that hasn't built up a solid usage yet. It's difficult to parse ideas that are still evolving as we gain better understanding of the situation.
It's just a niggling bit of figuring out the kind of structure to present as much of the concept as possible.
Since manhood isn't defined by genitals, in a true sense, even someone having a penis probably being a man kinda leaves trans people that have a penis that aren't men in a gray area for the purpose of this kind of tangential discussion.
I would say that the " if a person has a penis, that person is probably a man" works fine, I just can't say it's correct. More that it's more correct than the original statement in the comic.
Again, this is about thinking over the passage language of it to eventually winnow down into something that would be correct in a more singular sense.