174
Too bad the inflation number they're using is exactly what the whole 'lies, damn lies, and statistics' saying is talking about.
yeah my raises have been like 2% still and food is double what it used to be.
That's not incompatible with what they said. They're saying that the rate of wage increases over the last year outpaced inflation. They also ran below inflation during the COVID-19 crisis.
COVID-19's impact started in 2020.
looks at graph in article
Okay, though it looks like inflation only took off in early 2021.
They're saying that from June 2023 to June 2024, real wages increased. But they also decreased for about two years prior to that, from a couple months into 2021 until about halfway through 2023 -- you can see the dark blue line being below 0 for that period (or, equivalently, that the medium blue line was above the light blue line). Halfway through 2023, it then rises above 0, and has been above since that point. But the period of time that it was decreasing (a bit over two years) was about twice as long as the one year that it's been increasing, and during that decrease period, was decreasing faster than it increased over the last year. So they're rebounding, but they won't be where they were immediately prior to the crisis.
So, basically, they're not saying anything worthy of a headline, much less a whole article. Thanks for letting us know... smdh.
Thank you. These articles have made no sense to me but admittedly I have not bothered to rtfa after a bit as it felt like bs. This at least explains it. Funny that they are speaking non inflation adjusted which is likely what I am feeling.
Yeah I am not making the ~25% more I should be making to stay even from 2019 to now.
yeah. its funny the unrelated articles that I see related to it. Dr. Pepper becomes the number two soda seller. Don't know about anyone else but around me dr. pepper is the only soda that comes up as 99 cents for a 2liter about once a month. Even the generics do not go on sale that often to that price and 69 cent 2liters are long gone. As one person pointed out in another thing the fed uses a basket of goods that changes based on what people are buying so if folks buy cheaper options out of necessity then that is not included in inflation numbers.
The article is talking macroeconomics, you're talking microeconomics. Two different worlds.
Now do median
Median earnings grew faster than inflation every quarter between Q2 2022 and Q4 2023, a year and a half straight. Ticked down in Q1 2024 but basically back to pre pandemic levels.
No one in this thread actually wants answers to their questions. They wanna bitch and moan. What are you thinking?
I would like so see the median also.
I wonder what the average income is for US families if one was to remove all the billionaires from the statistic.
I can’t wait for that train to come to town.
The real median household income in the United States for 2022 was $74,580, which represents a 2.3 percent decline from the 2021 estimate of $76,3301. This figure is based on money income, which is pretax and does not account for the value of in-kind transfers. It’s important to note that this calculation excludes billionaires and focuses on the broader population.
It seems that they are already excluded for some reason.
They are not excluded, it's just the the number of people is used, not the amount of money
Because it’s a median which by definition excludes extremes.
Lol I hate to break it to you homie but billionaires are not paid in hourly wages so they are excluded from this report.
It's so nice to be leaving another historic, traumatic crisis and entering another depressing normal, where we get to live out our tedious, soul crushing lives while we await the next crisis.
load more comments
(1 replies)
ITT: I haven’t personally experienced it so this is not true.
I wonder if y’all realize how like conservatives you are sometimes.
Personal experience, speaking with the community and hearing their experiences mean nothing. Believe what the owner class says at all times.
This is hilarious because I’ll tell you the exact same thing I told conservatives during COVID:
I’ll take data over your anecdotes, thanks.
load more comments
(4 replies)
The article is real and "shit still sucks" can both be true.
My thought upon reading the headline was "gonna need another 12 years before people start thinking we have turned the corner for the better."
load more comments
(2 replies)
I get what you are implying but it really isn't relevant. Economics is just someone's opinion at best, more often than not it is propaganda, lying with math. Not at all the same as the vaccine nutters or global warming denying.
The hole was really deep. And that inflation from Covid didn't go away. Beating inflation now does not negate losing to inflation then. You have to beat inflation that much harder to both gain now and make up for previous losses.
Is that why I was fired after training my replacement that was paid less than me? Is that why nobody is paying the amount I was formerly paid for my skill set now?
Cuz, from my point of view, nobody wants to train and nobody wants to pay employees what they’re worth.
For who?
"For whom", and it's an average.
What is the point of the word Who if you never get to use it?
load more comments
(4 replies)
For people making the statistical average hourly wage growth. If your wage gains are less than the numerical average of everyone else, its your employers fault, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics
loud. sustained fart sounds yeah right
I got some oceanfront property in Arizona. I'd be glad to sell you.
And your employer will be happy to give you a raise that is less than the statistical average of other people.
And how much of that is minimum wage going up? Don't get me wrong I love that. But going from 15k to 20k a year is going from drowning to clinging to a piece driftwood. The full time annual take home needs to be around 40k-50k per person with all the decades of negative real wages.
And the name of the person running that department? Albert Einstein. Now everyone clap
looks at graph
Real wages are still below inflation. Nominal wage growth is what is above inflation.
Which means people are getting more money but it is worth less.
This means economic growth is down, and therefore the overall economy is demonstrably not in good shape.
*Edit To add from the article:
Nominal wage growth is the year-over-year growth in wages, not adjusted for inflation.
So... this doesn't mean a whole lot then.
Nominal is more than inflation so real is above 0.
Real just has to be above 0 for inflation adjusted wages to be going up.
I still call bullshit though without knowing where the increases are. All the increases could be in the top 10% with everyone else going down and only the average is above 0.
Edit: I was wrong, the growth is actually weighted toward the lower end.
The "real wages" is just the difference between the nominal wages and inflation. It's negative when wages have increased but not as much as inflation, and positive when they've increased more than inflation.
So the literal number of dollars people are getting have been going up the whole time, but for a while there the amount of stuff your money could buy you was going down anyway. It's recently the case that the amount of stuff you could buy has been going up. Not, you know, a lot, but...
Real wages are still below inflation.
That is impossible since 'real wages' are the difference between nominal wages and inflation.
Nominal wage growth is what is above inflation.
Which is another way to say that real wages (after inflation) are going up.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
174 points (92.6% liked)
News
21860 readers
3323 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS