26
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Completely random stoned hypothetical. Lets day im old as fuck and I decide I'm ready and done. Could I have the same postmortem autopsy done on me while I'm still alive? Like give me a ton of drugs and let me watch myself get dissected as my final moments. I understand there is a legal and possibly moral concern, but is it really ethically that bad if I also want it? Like I'm not taking myself out at my prime, I'm nearly dead anyways. Lemme see myself cut apart that'd be cool as shit, only if I couldn't feel any pain though.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago

I know in Germany murder is still murder if the murdered person consented to it.

Also, an autopsy isn't just "randomly cutting someone apart". The point of an autopsy is to determine a person's couse of death and doesn't just involve cutting the dead person open. You being alive means that an autopppsy, by definition, cannot be performed on you.

What you want is someone to mutilate and kill you. I'm pretty sure you can find someone willing to do that.

Side note: I think you overestimate how long you will stay conscious when the blood starts flowing, painkillers don't fix your brain running out of oxygen.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wasn't it in Germany that someone posted an ad to be eaten? Which happened

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I think it was a German who wanted to "cook you" not "cook for you". (The IT crowd)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[-] EmoDuck 2 points 1 month ago

Meiwes then ran Brandes a bath, before going to read a Star Trek book, while checking on Brandes every fifteen minutes...

Wonder which book he was reading

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[-] EmoDuck -1 points 1 month ago

You dropped this, king: 🤓

[-] EmoDuck 8 points 1 month ago

With Armin Meiwes it was argued that the victim couldn't consent to being killed because he wasn't mentally sound. And he wasn't mentally sound because he consented to being killed.

I could imagine that if you could convince a court that you are mentally sound beforehand, you could have someone legally murder you.

The whole eating thing is actually treated somewhat separately because that falls under disturbing the dead

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So reverse catch-22?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That’s a good point. “Determining the cause of death” implies that the person is dead. It’s like braiding the hair of a bald guy.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

I believe the technical term you are looking for is a “vivisection”.

And if you ask a surgeon to do it… “just to see” expect there to be some amount of shock. And maybe some very unfun drugs. Maybe a straight jacket…

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Depends on the surgeon i would say. I would bet that there are other Joseph Mengele’s hiding in the world. He just needs to find some sociopath that is also a doctor.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

His shock. Doc’s shock. Either way. Shock.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Head transplant dude?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

I think your have a poor understanding of what occurs during an autopsy. I do commend the documentation of high thoughts and think we need a community - maybe elevated ideas?

[-] ilovededyoupiggy 17 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Hey! It's already there!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

I do not think that word means what you think it means.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

This would be a vivisection.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Good evening. Tonight's nightmare/night terror is brought to you by [email protected].

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Short answer: No.

As far as I'm aware, the first step in an autopsy is to drain the body of blood before any incision is made. You'd be dead long before you got to "see your insides".

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sure you can. I mean, not legally ~anywhere, but pay some sketchy dr 25k and make a world-first snuff film. I'm not sure why anyone would want to do this, and I sure don't think it would be "cool as shit" but you probably would shit yourself. And I suspect that even if you're real high, it would still be traumatizing for all involved

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

i think that if im that close to death already i would rather throw away my fear and get a lil weird for it. i don't see why it necessarily has to be traumatizing.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't see why it necessarily has to be traumatizing.

I know there's a good chance you're high so let's get this straight.

A doctor will have to cut you up. There's only 2 reasons for a doctor to go along. The first is unhealthy levels of sadism. The second is an acute need for money. No one in their right mind would go along with this. And generally cutting up a person that's alive would be traumatizing to everyone. Just look up stories of doctors in warzones. Seeing this stuff can cause bad defense mechanisms to activate through our innate instincts and most doctors have mad PTSD if they deal with this a few times. Cutting someone up that's alive is like that, but tuned to an extreme that even less people can bear.

[-] eletes 12 points 1 month ago

Sever your spinal cord so your body is paralyzed. Then you won't have to worry about pain.

This would be a wild situation though. Feels like human centipede levels of wild

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Give yourself to science instead. Surely there are some companies hoping to try new products or experiments on live specimens.

Maybe some trippy new drug. Maybe hot dogs for fingers. Not sure how that all works.

[-] Ziggurat 5 points 1 month ago

In general you cannot consent in being assassinated, and even in place where euthanasia/assisted suicide is legal, there is still a strict process to make-it cleanly rather than cutting down a person in piece

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Mind you this boils down to an absurdly short list of countries who even allow euthanasia at all.

And that's because making sure the victim consented is super scary and risky. You don't wanna accidentally allow murder, even if it's only for the very smart murderers who can forge documents.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It's called vivisection. I'm sure you could find someone on Craigslist to help you out.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

"Do no harm" is sort of their thing, even if the doctor normally works with dead people.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Dude I've met too many doctors to believe that anymore

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think that the Nazis or Japanese did experiments in that vain, but don't quote me on it. They did quite a lot that makes my stomach roil. As to how far they could get, no clue.

Either way, once organs start to be removed, you won't be around for long. Under most circumstances anyways. We do have the ability to sub in machines for failed organs, such as heart, kidneys or lungs, but I don't know of any cases where all of them have been replaced with machines at the same time with the "patient" still awake during.

Full life support tends to be a "Buddy, your fucked!" sort of thing and if you're not already in a coma, they will likely put you in one.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The Japanese didn't give their victims pain relief or anesthesia.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's called biopsy? Anyway if the doctors won't give it to you, post an ad on the darkweb

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

~~biopsy~~
vivisection

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
26 points (65.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34333 readers
1236 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS