this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
247 points (98.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6379 readers
1683 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nuke 31 points 6 months ago

Based Denmark

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What's the context of this?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Czechia gave 800k artillery shells to Ukraine, Denmark donated their entire stock.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

Afaik Czechia identified 800k shells available on the world market (a lot from Turkey) and they are looking for partners to buy them for Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! I'm Czech, so now I feel embarrassed for not knowing about it.

[–] cashews_win 5 points 6 months ago

Your president should join your country's fantastic gay porn industry! I'm a big fan. :D

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Wait so are they playing Blackjack or Texas Holdem?

If they're playing Blackjack, one of those cards should be the other way. If they're playing Holdem we'd need more information to tell if going all in would be reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

actually, they're playing cards.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Oh thanks, that clarifies everything!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

They are playing Hold'em, but my guess is that Denmark doesn't expect to be called on this move.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Ace King suited is fun to yolo with.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

The result is dead orcs so all in is quite reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If this is pre flop and you're going all in, just a pair of pocket twos has better odds of winning than AK suited.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No, it's almost exactly a coin flip. AK has so many outs, flush potential, straight potential. The pair of twos has exactly two cards out of the whole deck to improve.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Almost exactly, but not quite. Difference is a pair of twos is already the winning hand. The AK HAS to have one of the other aces or kings drop, or get a straight or a flush. Twos will win without any help.

Odds of deuces winning on an all in pre-flop are 52% to 48% against a big slick, but that's exactly the type of odds that make sure casinos always make money gambling. "Not quite a coin flip"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The flush potential puts it over the edge. Just use a calculator yourself. It's 49.77% (in favor of AK) vs 49.60%.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Well shit. Seems right.

[–] kewko 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Funny enough, if one of the pocket pair of 2s is the same suite as the suited AK, odds once again marginally tip over to the 2s side

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

"My friend, you bow to no one."

[–] Estiar 2 points 6 months ago

How much stock does Denmark even have?