250
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Its a gift link, so shouldn't be a paywall :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 120 points 5 months ago

For people who hate being told what to do, they sure love telling people what to do.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago

They love telling women what to do.

They hate women telling others what to do.

[-] [email protected] 108 points 5 months ago

They always say this stuff to liberal celebrities, but invite Ted Nugent and other absolute POS conservatives on

[-] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago

Sonny Bono, Arnold, Glenn Jacobs, Reagan, Trump... I think I'm forgetting some.

Republicans love voting for celebrities when they have the chance.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Charleton Heston, Kelsey Grammar, Scott Baio, Clint Eastwood, Kid Rock, Ted Nugent...

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

I was limiting it to elected officials.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago

I, for one, am keenly interested in Kid Rock's opinion on the role of central banking in a post-pandemic economy. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 82 points 5 months ago

Vote.gov is your place to sign up to vote.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago

Make sure you're actually registered, even if you think you already are. A lot of states have been "cleaning up" their voting registries .

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago

I mean seriously, she's not qualified like a reality tv con man, to be involved in politics!

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Yeah, plus she's actually, like, good at business. Conservatives would prefer the guy who managed to bankrupt a casino.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Let me get this straight, you think that Taylor Swift, one of the wealthiest and most powerful women in the world, is secretly a liberal, who spends her nights fucking an NFL star, and your plan is to intimidate this person?

Good luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago

Hey Fox, I'm not a Taylor Swift fan at all, but I trust her infinitely more than your lying fascist bullshit network.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago

Why are they allowed to give their opinion on politics but she isn't? Why are they qualified and not her?

[-] n3m37h 24 points 5 months ago

She has a brain, they jusy read whatever is on the teleprompter

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

They are both in the entertainment industry. Neither are qualified

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

No First Amendment rights for her, that's why.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

She's liberal, and a successful woman. Their two greatest fears

[-] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago

Wish they had this same attitude towards Ted “fucks pre teens” Nugent

[-] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Or the former Apprentice reality TV star

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

Taylor Swift is absolutely not the person that the GOP wants saying "Hold my beer and watch this.....". If they pissed her off enough to motivate her to get political, she absolutely has the influence and resources to register a few thousand new Democrat Swifties.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

A few thousand seems pretty small

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Pretty fucking rich that their chosen savior is a reality TV star.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

And before that, the darling of the GOP was former actor Ronald Reagan...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

They are terrified of her influence.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

This has less to do with Swift and more to do with Fox's decades long strategy to keep misogynists angry with successful women and engaged with Fox news.

[-] gravitas_deficiency 20 points 5 months ago

well I wasn’t going to, but now that you mention it…

[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

Taylor Swift to Fox News: "Don't get involved in journalism...oh wait"

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Don't worry, Fox hasn't engaged in journalism in years.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

She hasn't done or said anything political though? Is it just that she's a vivacious person and the ghouls are thinking "fuck, she's definitely not one of us".

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

She did endorse the Democrat running for Senate in Tennessee in 2018, so they're not wrong

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Fox Corp.'s $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems says that Fox should stop libeling. There are plenty of other lawsuits to point out that say the same thing.

If what Fox claimed were true, they would have won the lawsuit. If what Fox claimed were not provably, knowingly lies, Fox would have won.

I always side with the person who speaks truth, who fights lies.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Or else what, exactly?

[-] n3m37h 15 points 5 months ago

Has she even said shit at this point or all the morons just going off the handle for no reason?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

She endorsed Biden last election, but that doesn't mean they're not going off the handle for no reason.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Back at ya, Fox!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Have you tried grabbing her by the pussy?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

LOL. Fuck off, Fox. She will do what she wants to do because she's a woman capable of making her own decisions. Not that you would ever understand or appreciate.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Uhg. can you imagine standing in line waiting to vote, with the swifties all having their favorite songs on blast from the phones?

never thought that would be a reason I'd appreciate vote-by-mail.

(I'm mostly kidding... but yeah. not having to stand in line and deal with...uh... people... is nice.)

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

And it's ok for something claiming to be a "news source" to be political?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

EVERYONE is involved in politics, what the hell do they even mean? Politics affect everyone. It's not like people choose to be involved, they are, even if they don't like it.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I gotta say that it's pretty fucking refreshing to see this "celebrities need to stay out of politics" being rejected after it was more or less accepted in the 00s. Reality is pivoting faster than Fox is as old tactics die.

I've also noticed that the condescendingly polite subtle insults are starting to get old and recognized as just normal insults because the subtlety has disappeared.

Also the "ask questions" tactic from How to Win Friends and Influence People is getting more push back rather than leading people to different conclusions, though that one isn't as nice to see because when that worked, it was usually for a good reason but it just being dismissed means one less way people in disagreement can come to agree. But it is an interesting evolution in the way we communicate and interact that I've noticed lately.

Though those last two might just be due to the different demographic at Lemmy vs Reddit.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Though those last two might just be due to the different demographic at Lemmy vs Reddit.

This site definitely isn't representative of much if you're using it to speak to larger cultural trends or something. It's definitely not an indicator of those.

I have a theory of my own though. I think that pop culture is dying as a thing in general. I think social media platforms are more widely recognized as the societal ill that they are, broadcast / cable TV is largely dead, movies are moving from the cinemas to streaming services in record time, Internet streaming apps killed the radio star, etc. etc.

Everyone tunes into their own shows, their own music, their own movies, their own books, their own cultural experiences, their own news, and even their own realities.

I think we're living through an era where mainstream popular culture is getting devoured by software platforms and disparate experiences and the output is more and more that everyone's in the "long tail" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail) being exposed only to things that sit in personalized niches.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

"That's our job", they added.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

How much Fox News cost and can she afford it?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Shut up and dribble

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
250 points (92.5% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS