Bwaz

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Came to these comments hoping to see some thoughts about what this evidence includes. But none. Is no one even curious??

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Am I the only person who noticed that JD didn't have overdone eyeliner during last night's debate? Like the campaign maybe sprung for a competent makeup artist this time?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Catch 22 Tom Jones Good Omens Double Whammy (Carl Hiassen)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Next up: Republican politician complains about the cost efficiency of government.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Asking for a friend?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine a President Vance. Compare to a President Waltz. Either would be possible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I think the point was that the reporter was being no more than competent enough to insist on a reply to his question. It looked sharp only compared to milquetoast U.S. reporters who are almost universally afraid to confront anyone for fear of blacklisting.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But she did -- fracking??

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's depressing that you have to even say that it's untrue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I tried two different ones. First dudn't function (defective unit). 2nd worked but no so great for my cats. Our large male urinates a lot, so the bag needed replacement after about a day and a half. And it was WAY more difficult to clean inside the thing (big drum shaped inside thing) than just a simple catbox was.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

That would've been EPIC

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

But Kamala Harris should have poited that out and reminded everyone that Trump wouldn't answer. Then it would be her jabbing him instead of some talking head no one knows letting it pass. Missed opportunity.

view more: next ›