this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
1083 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

71885 readers
4608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Has US nationalized anything this millenia? I really don't see that ever happening

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jubilationtcornpone 21 points 2 weeks ago

Also losses. Gotta get that sweet, sweet too-big-to-fail bailout money.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Airport security was nationalized as the TSA. Aside from that no.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So it takes a spectacular failure of capitalist grifters? Check.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Technically the auto industry in 2008.

[–] explodicle 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean if we count bailouts as nationalization, then now we've got like some kinda national "socialism" where state and corporate power have fused.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 3 points 2 weeks ago

The GM situation was a more than a bailout, they took complete control of the company, took it private, liquidated some assets, then sold it off in a new IPO.

It's not all that different from a private equity firm doing the same thing, the major difference is the legal protections the US had (e.g. it got priority over all other creditors). If the US wanted to keep it and run it, it could've.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Technically no. Bailout =/= nationalization.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 2 points 2 weeks ago

It was more than something like a loan, the federal government actually a fair amount of control over the company. It ended up divesting itself once the new, restructured company made its IPO, but during the bailout, the US gov was technically in control, and it got priority over all other interests since the company went private with special financing.

It's certainly different than other nationalized industries, but it was also much more than a regular bailout.