Pro

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 minutes ago (2 children)

they're just going to lower the quality of their products.

Great, you as user of the service/ product can make your choice to not deal with companies that use AI.

The rest of users can enjoy more choices as they might simply prefer AI.

AI in the strict sense doesn't exist yet.

WTF?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 24 minutes ago (4 children)

My dude, don't put words in my mouth.

I said Protesting AI is dumb , not all protesting is dumb.

Also, when did protesting AI had actually worked to achieve real improvement?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 28 minutes ago (4 children)

2 things: AI is wider than LLMs and if you were even remotely correct then artists and writers would not protest it at all.

-3
submitted 40 minutes ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I support giving users the choice between AI and non-AI services and products.

But workers protesting the use of AI in their industries are dumb in my opinion.

AI is going to change a lot of industries forever and there is almost nothing workers and unions can do currently to actually stop the progress.

I even had seen some worker unions who are protesting AI use, accept working with companies that use AI and I support them, Because they won't be taken seriously if they did not do that.

In short: I think workers should protest workers conditions and wages, rather than protesting technology.

AI adaptation is inevitable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

One problem I see in your way of thought here, adblock use among social media users will never reach 100%.

Furthermore, adblockers are getting weaker with Google Chrome MV3. All of this leads to the logical conclusion in my eyes that you can only change the sources that power users use which will eventually lead to better privacy for all people involved. You will never be able to control people setups to be super private.

 

Will people start caring for their privacy if most of the links posted were tracking free?

The reason I am asking is because despite the amount of posts I posted and all the ways that I advocated for getting news from tracking free websites/ non-profits, people don't seem to change.

I still see people posting links from people, the independent, CBS, Vox Media and other evil companies still being posted.

Will people on the long-term change or is it a lost cause?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Said that on Social Media

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Olvid, for people close to me. Signal for strangers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

What. The. Fuck. Are You Talking About?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Yes, they are even republished by OCCRP.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
view more: next ›