explodicle

joined 9 months ago
[–] explodicle 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Presumably the same stuff they did for the last year?

[–] explodicle 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if 1M other people just like you are saying that.

[–] explodicle 1 points 12 hours ago

How many were there?

[–] explodicle 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Because most people weren't arguing about Gaza and it wouldn't have changed the outcome.

With the benefit of hindsight, the only way she could have won would have been to address the high cost of living. "The economy" was the highest ranked issue and people voted for the guy who lied about eggs.

[–] explodicle 2 points 20 hours ago

That's OK, you're still using up the prosecutor's ammo during jury selection.

[–] explodicle 1 points 1 day ago

"... so I shall cancel the tour for you."

[–] explodicle 3 points 1 day ago

IMHO there's a range of people on every instance. Instance is a sticky decision we make hastily that follows us around for years, like an email address or an immature username.

For example one of the commenters under this issue mentions being "stuck" on .ml.

[–] explodicle 1 points 1 day ago

IQ is racially biased, they'd love it. We could just switch to the Schulze method and require that candidates explain how it works.

[–] explodicle 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the EQ test discriminate against autistic people?

[–] explodicle 1 points 1 day ago

Haven't you heard the news? We're all officially ladies now.

[–] explodicle 8 points 1 day ago

GNU Theft Auto

[–] explodicle 7 points 2 days ago

The ones who voted for Trump do and that's it.

view more: next ›