this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
612 points (97.8% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2089 readers
1139 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 181 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

What's hilarious to me is a large part of the value of Twitter was the actual brand name "Twitter" and "tweets". Those terms are recognized around the world and pronounced more or less the same globally. That is something no other social media platform has ever been able to reproduce. It's always "posts", "likes", "messages", and "comments."

This is a literal destruction of value for absolutely no reason other than the fact that one guy think it sounds cool.

Throw this onto the pile of "Elon clearly doesn't know what the fuck he's doing"

Anyone who can't see that this is a bad idea is being willfully ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You make a really good point. The whole concept of a short form text was branded, like Kleenex instead of tissues. I guess Elon thinks that the user base is the most important thing and it doesn’t matter what it’s called?

In any event, “X” is sophomoric. It’s a silly rebranding that doesn’t make sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

like Kleenex instead of tissues

No, this is like amazingly, monumentally more stupid. Pre-Elon (prelon?) twitter was getting free advertising on virtually every news cast and commercial in the US. I'm going to guess this varies worldwide, but twitter is for sure a brand that had probably about as much global reach as Apple, McDonald's, etc.

There is virtually no stupider brand change/rename that I can possibly imagine. I thought Max dropping "HBO" might have been one of the dumbest of all time, but this is a whole other level. And I didn't even get to talking about the new brand, which is also possibly one of the dumbest of all time. This post is merely talking about how incredibly dumb it is to drop a globally recognized brand, not even getting to the fact that the brand he chose is dumb for a thousand reasons.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Upvote solely for the portmanteau, stayed for the rest of your comment!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we are in agreement! Very true that Twitter was getting free advertising. But if “X” is still relevant, I guess the news will just give that free branding? Already the rebranding has caused a lot of conversation, which is also free advertising, to an extent?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The free ads they're getting right now are like "wow can you believe how much oil BP spilled into the ocean?" Nobody is looking at that and going "I should buy more BP."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It only makes sense when you you look at it from his perspective of making an everything app. "X" or "X corp" sounds and looks very cyperpunkish and it's been his fantasy since at least 10 years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

sophomoric

Learned a new word today, thanks! ♥

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Imagine if Google, whose search engine has even a verb - googling - associated with its usage, suddenly decided to rename its wholle search brand to something bland like "A" (so, not even something quirky and distinct that could easilly be turn into a verb like, say, "Pock", but just the one letter)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

A seems a little short needs more letters hell just name it the whole alphabet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I refuse to believe that he's this shit at business.

Like this has to be a money grab somehow. He just can't be this fucking stupid. Can he?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I think he's this narcissistic and impulsive but he's always had some sort of buffer between his worst impulses and reality.

He was a VC bro that was able to sell a few unicorn ideas to employees and investors (which is no small feat). His investors at his other companies were able to help build competent teams around him and prevent him from pinballing between bad ideas and keep him relatively focused on their investment and ideas that would work.

As Musk's weath grew, so did his power. His need for investors (and the need to listen to them) diminished. Also weath and power attract an entourage who are willing to do/say anything to stay on Elon's good side.

Elon only only purchased Twitter because he was compulsively tweeting.

He signed a no due diligence contact because no one around him was there to say "that's a really fucking stupid idea, there's no rush to buy Twitter, take all the time you need." But he signed a terms sheet that no homeowner should sign before purchasing a much less a multi-billion dollar acquisition. For reference, an acquisition of a small company with an annual revenue of less than $1M annually takes 3-6 months to go through due diligence, multi-billion dollar acquisitions can take years. That's a seriously compulsive decision.

If he sold his stake after saying he was going to buy them, Twitter was going to sue his ass off for doing a pump and dump and intentionally destroying stock value. That would also open an SEC investigation. Both of those would show the public how fucking stupid Elon is in a court of law. That's simply not okay for a narcissist. They must feed their ego.

Now at Twitter, he doesn't have a large backing of investors that he has to listen to like in a normal VC situation, AND he thinks he's actually smarter than everyone around him and we can see the emperor has no clothes.

After being a lucky VC that got forced out of his initial investments right before the DotCom bubble burst Elon's main value was as a marketer.

At Tesla he was able to sell investors and employees a vision of a gas-free future. At SpaceX he sold his vision of exploring the stars.

Who is clamouring for the next great social media platform?

Who's asking for the next 'everything' app?

Who's asking a private company to be more involved in their day to day lives?

Users certainly aren't.

Tl;Dr: Elon was a lucky VC, who's main value was as a marketer and not as an ops/engineering specialist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He can and antics like this show he was born from money and a silver spoon in his ass. He is stupid and talentless and uses his money to try to prove otherwise, but since Trump he went mask off and no one can pretend a single word form his mouth is intelligent anymore.

Lucky fucking bastard, i hope his luck runs out but he's too rich to become destitute.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Spending billions of dollars to sink a business is the biggest brain cash grab I've ever heard of

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess we have to get used to people referring to "tooting" on Mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I like Mastodon and all, but I'm never going to call a Mastodon post a "toot." It's a terrible name for a post.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I think of the word 'toot,' the first thing that comes to mind is farting. Maybe that's just me though?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not just you, everyone has the same thought.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it supposed to mean something else?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

A mastodon is like an elephant and they toot with their trunks. Like how a dog barks or a bird tweets.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In germany its called a "Tröt" like the sound an elephant makes. It's super fun to say. Try it! Tröt, tröt

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny you say that, because "the trots" means diarrhoea in many English countries. So.. Might be worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Haha, we call them "the runs" in the SE US, so the tots makes a lot of sense. Never heard it before now though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

🎺 🎺 🎺 🎺 🎺 🎺

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that makes me feel like it's not a serious platform. I can't imagine convincing any friend to use it by saying "toots".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vine had vines which was kind of unique. Didn't have quite the reach of twitter though and died by twitter's hand.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vine would have been a better TikTok. At the very least, it wasn't Chinese-owned.

It never made sense to me why they shut it down because it got so popular so fast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Because most of these things pay to get popular. I am a very tech savvy person. Have been using Linux since the early 1990s. I had sign-ins on every major instant message network and many people have never heard of. The first day I ever heard of Twitter. Was when they all the sudden started pushing it on cable news. Back in the late aughts. It was nowhere and then it was everywhere. And there was definitely some money behind the publicity. There's a reason things like Mastodon get very little coverage. There's no money behind it. Which is exactly the reason many people use it. But it limits who gets exposed to it. So if he pay a bunch of money to get your product in front of the eyes of a bunch of people even if it gets popular. It may not get popular enough to cover the cost of the advertising and money invested in equipment.