30
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

Really hits weird when a video talking about something so serious has a thumbnail that looks like it could be on a video about Fortnite.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago

Yeah, one glance at the terms of use had me uninstalling the app. I don't feel like "decentralized social media" and "sale of personal data" pair well together.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

Drives me crazy when I see this kind of format for things like programming. Nothing like pausing the video and trying to see what their code says.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

This sounds like the most likely definition. But really, it's on them for not putting any sort of definition for the term. Some random person reading it will assume all kinds of possible meanings.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Dang, I'm feeling pretty lucky that no one in my life uses WhatsApp. Sounds like that's not the norm.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

I can't say I'm surprised. I was honestly wondering how this backlash would affect kornel; it can't feel good to get such a negative response on an open source project like this, and I feel bad for him. While I strictly don't agree with the actions done against crypto crates, especially not the marking of an active crate as deprecated, I thought that some of the other reactions to things like marking crates as non-semver compliant were overblown.

Specifically, I think one of the cases definitely was an accident, as it probably was made at a point when it really looked like the author was doing the same 1.0.x format that some other notable crates are guilty of, even thought that turned out to not be the case.

Ultimately, this is a good example of why crates.io is so hesitant to be opinionated at all about anything, which is I think a big reason why something like lib.rs came into existence anyway. If anyone has been wondering why crates.io is so hesitant to stop people from squatting crates names, it's because they would get reactions like this. Being opinionated means things will get political and the community may divide themselves over it.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Who on earth decided to leave the projector on while they took the group photo?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Just be glad you're on Android and have alternatives to this. Poor Apple users are stuck with whatever Apple decided to do with the app store.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

Incredibly relevant: https://theoatmeal.com/comics/game_of_thrones

It's been said a million times, but piracy is an accessibility issue. Chasing your favorite shows across streaming platforms is exhausting.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

I think they do understand this, to a point. That's why they keep threatening their mods instead of outright removing them.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

I wonder if public freakouts was told to remove the NSFW tag. That sub definitely should have been NSFW all along.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a whole set of users who apparently think the mods are in the wrong and that Reddit is right. Whether these are real users, and not armies of bots using ChatGPT to generate content, is up for debate. (But they're definitely bots lol)

view more: next ›

Anders429

joined 1 year ago