this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
293 points (98.0% liked)

News

23634 readers
4152 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

At least it's a dismissal without prejudice which leaves the door open for charges to be brought back once Trump is no longer in office and as long as the statute of limitation hasn't run out.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago

leaves the door open for charges to be brought back once Trump is no longer in office

Assuming his lard-ass lives that long.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago

You know how the courts love putting rich old white dudes behind bars, right?

Assuming of course we don’t end up with a Republican dictatorship after this presidency, then it’s all meaningless anyway.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A glimmer of hope, but at least, of the extremely limited options, this one leaves a shred of hope behind.

Still fucking awful and a complete condemnation of the justice system in the US, but POC in the States have known that for years, now it's just whitey getting shown how fucking biased it is to privilege and wealth.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

A lot of us whiteys already knew

[–] neidu3 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't say I'm feeling overly optimistic about anything worthwhile happening with this case after 9 years, when they failed to move forward in nearly 5

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

How is "less than 4" now "nearly 5"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Does that really make a difference in their argument?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What "argument"? It's just doomer moaning, using hyperbole to amplify their own defeatism. I'm just pointing out the bs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not "doomer moaning" to think that if they didn't prosecute him in the four year period after his presidency that they won't do it eight or twelve years after his presidency when he's either dead from old age or well into his 80s.

That's not defeatist it's simply witnessing the actions of our current leadership and believing them. You can choose to believe their words instead, but there's zero reason to when their actions (both past and current) directly contradict them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

It's not "doomer moaning"

It is when they're lying about the time that's already passed. They're clearly more interested in embellishing than being realistic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Until Trump’s DOJ decides to re-dismiss with prejudice.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That can only be done if the case is presented again. You can't dismiss something that doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Get ready to find out that all laws are just made up and no one gives a shit if the other people with power let him do whatever he wants

[–] Peruvian_Skies -1 points 3 weeks ago

You're a teenager, aren't you?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

Who's going to revive a 10 year old political case against an 83 year old that's retiring from politics? In the US?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Lol he's dead by then. Are we puting a dead person on trial?

[–] iAmTheTot 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Who is going to stop Trump from pardoning himself?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

He cannot pardon himself on a dismissed case.

[–] iAmTheTot 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Again, who is going to stop him? The presidential pardon is wide reaching, and no one has ever tried to pardon themselves before so there's no legal precedent. You think this supreme court is gonna stop him?

Also, he absolutely can pardon for something that was dismissed. Nixon got pardoned for something he was never even charged with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Fun mental excersise:

Even if the president can't pardon themself. They could just temporarily declare themselves inable to perform the powers and duties of the presidency, then the VP becomes Acting President, and the VP as Acting President can pardon the President. Voila, its not a self-pardon.

Shenaigans... Shenanigans...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

He could. The president can pardon any federal crimes that's already committed except in cases of impeachment. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon even tho he was never charged with crimes. Now the constitution never explicitely said they can pardom themselves, but maybe the supreme court would let him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Jack Smith, apparently.