Peruvian_Skies

joined 9 months ago
[–] Peruvian_Skies 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I can't believe I'm agreeing with you of all people, but I have as well and as strange as it may sound to people who haven't, there is a certain proportion of the homeless population which is homeless by choice. It's not a large proportion, but it's not that small either.

It's a chicken and egg problem with many schizophrenic and borderline homeless where you can't tell if they ended up on the street due to mental illness or if living on the street made them mentally ill, but I have personally seen people choose to leave housing projects to go back to the street, and have heard similar stories from others.

That said, of course using this fact as an excuse to not do everything we can to house the majority of homeless who do want homes and to support the ones who don't in other ways (soup kitchens, clinics, etc and mental health counseling for those who want it) is absurd.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That was really fun to watch, thanks! Cows seem to be a lot better at ball sports than emus.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Cows recognize and respond to their given names (and sometimes even nicknames used by specific people) and have best friends. They are very far from stupid. They're lovely and charming animals. It takes a lot of cognitive dissonance for me to continue eating beef after spending some time at a dairy farm.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nice gaslighting attempt, bro.

Cheers.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

No rage, mate. Have I acted enraged at all during this conversation? I just like to call out bullshit. If that's fine with you, then this is a civil disagreement.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then the few people who don't are very prolific commenters because it's a mistake I see often.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 1 points 5 days ago

If "voters" means the same in both cases, why did you use numbers that specifically only apply to the last election to make a point?

[–] Peruvian_Skies 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

Just because this is a common enough mistake, I'm going to publicly correct you for the benefit of other people who might see this comment. I apologize.

It's Martial Law. Not Marshall Law.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Confiscate" sure is a weird way to spell "steal".

[–] Peruvian_Skies 1 points 5 days ago

Correct. When there isn't enough bread to go around, it doesn't really matter if everyone has money.

[–] Peruvian_Skies 6 points 5 days ago

Maim America, Grift Americans

[–] Peruvian_Skies 4 points 5 days ago

Rule 1 clearly says "posts have the following requirements".

9
Shaman take my hand (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago by Peruvian_Skies to c/imageai
 

Flux-dev GGUF with LoRAs

127
Decreasing (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Peruvian_Skies to c/imageai
 

Another generation using the text from the I Ching as a prompt. This time it was hexagram 41 - Decreasing, with old lines in the second and sixth positions.

27
Form and Emptiness (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 months ago by Peruvian_Skies to c/imageai
 
22
Not Yet Fullfilled (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 months ago by Peruvian_Skies to c/imageai
 

I made this image by prompting Flux-dev with the Image, Decision and Fifth Yao texts from the 64th hexagram (Wei Ji) in Alfred Huang's translation of the I Ching.

view more: next ›