this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
299 points (93.8% liked)

Today I Learned

17608 readers
1337 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the first I've heard of it, but here's one of his infamous quotes:

"There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews.

I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”

His other quotes tend to be condemnation about specifically Israeli zionism and barbaric murder, but i don't have context as to whether he's referring to palestine or not. Some people might have more sympathy for these statements these days, but a lot of his other quotes have to do with Jews controlling money and media, less defensible prejudice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People discriminate against each other for all kinds of stupid reasons. Yeah, the word racism gets used for groups that aren't actually genetic in nature sometimes. Let's not be pedantic about the terminology used to describe discrimination against groups that have been the victims of genocide though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is a word for that though, bigot. Racism is effectively a subclass of bigotry that is more specific. If we have a word for it already we should use that instead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

thank you, this is what i was getting at

[–] VirtualOdour 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Racists make this argument so often it's tiresome, 'Jewish isn't a religion' always comes from the same idiots who say 'this person cant be trusted because they're a Jew, look their great grandmother was Jewish!'

And 'I'm not a racist, just a bigot!' What's even the point?

Oh and interesting side fact, bigot likely comes from the phrase 'by god' which was often used by religious hypocrites and became a byword for intensely religious hypocrites. It came into English during conflict between protestants and catholics - suggesting racism is a sub category of bigotry implies acceptance of the modern meaning derived through common use over time.. which is what you're trying to reject for the word antisemitism, kinda seems then that it's not a honest approach you're taking but have brought into logic from racists who are trying to find semantic cover for their hatred of a group of people based on traits they believe are biologically innate in that group.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I think bigots deserve the same level of disdain as racists and/or antisemites. If racist/racism has become a common and accepted terminology to describe people that hate based on a common trait other than race then I stand corrected. Sorry my attempt to clarify someone elses point has lead you to believe I hold hatred for any group based on their race, religion, or other inherited trait. And sorry if I walked into a talking point from racists, I tend not to interact with them online or offline.

If I hold hatred towards anyone it's bigots and racists. What I'll tell you I've witnessed is the racism against Ethiopian Jews by Israeli Jews when they fled to a country that was supposedly their promise land. So when trying to have an intelligent discussion about this topic I do think it's fair to state bigots in Ethiopia forced people of their own race out of the country only for those that fled to go and face racists in a country that supoosedly shared their religious values. I hope this clarifies why I thought the distinction might be worthwhile. I understand language is ever evolving but I think there is a distinction between the origin of a word that is hundreds of years old verses what is still listed in most dictionaries. Again I'm not rejecting the strong presence of antisemitism throughout the world, I'm saying I see it as a subclass of bigotry the same as racism. Also again, whether I call someone an antisemite or a bigot I'll hold the same level of disdain for them.

I can only out words on the internet and it up to you to believe them but I hope you understand I wasn't coming from a place of any form of bigotry.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i mean i'm against all religions, but i'm not going to let anyone call me a racist because of that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well if you say there is "a trait in a group of peoples' character" then you should be called racist. This has nothing to do with being against religions.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

so...if you condemn scientology, then you're a racist?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not about who you condemn, dude. It's about what exactly you condemn them about. That really shouldnt be such a complicated concept.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago

it's not complicated. "jewish" is not a race. simple

[–] Varyk 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sorry, I don't get your reference.

Do you mean he's not racist because Jewish isn't a race?

In other quotes, he's much more clear that he's talking about Israeli people, like with zionism.

“I’m certainly anti-Israeli and I’ve become anti-Semitic in as much as that you get a Jewish person in another country like England strongly supporting Zionism. I think they should see both sides. It’s the same old thing: we all know about Jews and the rest of it. There aren’t any non-Jewish publishers anywhere, they control the media—jolly clever thing to do—that’s why the president of the United States has to sell all this stuff to Israel.”

It definitely seems to depend on which aspect of Jewish or Israeli culture or stereotypes he has problems with.

For good reason of course, Jewish rights organizations talk about themselves as Jews rather than as Israelis.

Not exactly the funnest mud puddle to skip through.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Secular Jews would likely disagree with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

secular jews call themselves a race?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's plenty of non-religious people who identify as Jewish, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There’s plenty of non-religious people who identify as Jewish, yes.

right. but the question was: according to secular jews, "Jewish" = "race"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

you can convert to judaism and literally become jewish, even though you weren't born into a jewish family. setting aside all the shit going on in politics right now, you cannot "decide" to become a different race

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Jewish" can describe race, ethnicity, culture, nationality, religion, or any combination of the above, depending on who's using the word and in what context.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

in what context is jewish a race?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Since you seem to be hung on semantics, perhaps a definition is in order:

Race is a categorization of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into groups generally viewed as distinct within a given society.[1] The term came into common usage during the 16th century, when it was used to refer to groups of various kinds, including those characterized by close kinship relations.[2] By the 17th century, the term began to refer to physical (phenotypical) traits, and then later to national affiliations. Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society.[3][4][5] While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning.[1][6][7] The concept of race is foundational to racism, the belief that humans can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.

To the extent that "race" is even a real thing (I'm of the opinion that it's not a useful or productive way to categorize people), many people do classify themselves and others using that terminology, for good or ill. It would generally be in the context of biological heritage ("bloodlines," ew).

I wonder if @[email protected] would have something to add here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I would personally prefer the word 'ethnicity' to 'race.' As far as I'm concerned, if you want to associate me with a race, it would be white. The problem is that a lot of white people don't see it that way. See Elon Musk saying "you have said the actual truth" to the guy who said that Jews were oppressing white people. But I'm not going to let those people get their way. I'm white.

I have all of the same privileges that come with being white in America that every other white person has and I share in the shameful responsibility white people need to take for racism, both institutional and personal. I really don't want to say I don't benefit from that unfairness or share that burden because that wouldn't be true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So the terminally online could be considered a race with a certain perspective. Interesting.

(I don’t say this to diminish or reject the definition. I just find it interesting to think about.)

Though maybe as others point out, it might be an ethnicity?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

really, it comes down to usage. science may not be able to pin down a "scientific" definition, and it absolutely is a construct--but isn't everything that isn't defined by a mathematical formula a "construct"?

so if we're stuck with using terms like "race" whether they're "real things" or not, then i think it's important to distinguish how they're used. i will not agree that "jewish" is a race in the same way that "african american" is a race, because although both groups face oppression, one of them is a choice, and the other isn't

though it has to be said, that according to judaism, if your mother is a jew, then you are too, whether you want to be or not. i call bullshit on that

hi @[email protected] !

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hello!

though it has to be said, that according to judaism, if your mother is a jew, then you are too

Only religious Judaism. Many Jews consider someone a Jew if they only have a Jewish father. Such as in the case of my daughter. I've yet to have anyone claim she isn't Jewish. I'm sure some Orthodox asshole would, but he'd say I wasn't Jewish either because I married a "shiksa," so...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

gotta love those pesky socially constructed rules and regulations...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I've seen another individual argue that it is in fact a race due to bloodlines running back to the source. I've gotta say I've got some of that fresh-squeezed jew-blood and even though I wasn't really raised around any Jewish folk and clearly am not religiously Jewish I have been picked out by practicing individuals for having some of that blood in me. As well as others, who are like me and miserable mutts cast to roam the Earth forever being mystery meat =P!

Perhaps there's levels to this though? I mean with the bigotry. I am not saying it's all roses, cause it ain't. But I am saying maybe when we get to the extreme that we want to wipe individuals from the Earth whomever they are (and whomever is thinking this) that's when we really know we're in the wrong. Then again I would cruxify all sex-offenders. So eh, who am I to speak? A nobody on this issue, but one last thing - I've got friends who are ethnically Jewish who absolutely do not see themselves as white. And yes, I know Jewish folk come in all shapes and sizes.

(p.s. - I refer my quantity of Jewishness as "jew" because I am lower-case ethnically but not even by Jewish standards (paternal) related to anything minuetly Jewish. Not because I am a raging anti-semite.)