Atomic

And again . That varies quite a lot depending on where the meat comes from.

To do what you do and just drag a giant blanket over everything is incredibly ignorant.

And I'm just really over the incredible hypocrisy. Eating meat is wrong cause an animal suffered, but wearing clothes made in a Vietnamese,chineese or Bangladesh sweatshop is ok. Because that only includes human suffering and slave like conditions.

It is two different topics.

I know for fact plenty of vegans think it's morally wrong to eat another living being. Regardless of how the animal is kept.

You seem to be speaking on behalf of a lot of vegans. I don't believe "most vegans" believe what you think they do. Certainly not the ones I've interacted with.

The almighty "the" meat industry. As if everything is the same everywhere with the same framework, rules, and regulations.

"quick/clean kill, like an arrow to a major artery"

Holy shit, you think getting shot with an arrow produces a "quick/clean" kill? I can't take anything you say seriously when your idea of a clean kill is a fucking arrow to an artery.

I don't think they're more morally correct. Because I don't think it's morally incorrect to eat another animal.

We can debate the treatment of animals in how they are kept. But that's another topic. And a wide one because it varies a lot depending on where you're from.

Says you. I'm pretty sure they have a completely different opinion regarding this being a breach of contract.

But I'm sure you know better. Because you read the entire ToS before clicking "I Agree" right?

Thought there would be more. But I block em as I see em.

The irony about "enough musk spam" is they're the ones spamming the most.

What you link still does not make it illegal for a company to ban your account if you try to defraud them.

There are many situations where your right for a refund is expired. Most commonly. After a certain time. I can't refund my purchase of CS 1.6. It's not illegal for Valve to refuse my refund for that game.

And despite the query you sent chatGPT None of its answers point to an actual law that says it's illegal for a service to cancel your account if you endadge in defraudment.

It's not unreasonable to agree to losing the right to use a service if you attempt to defraud said service. That's not an unfair stipulation in a ToS.

Let me know when your successful lawsuit comes through. Good luck on that.

Yes. That is the intended function.

But you know. Some people. They do things that are not intended. They're not supposed to. But they do it anyway. Maybe that's a difficult concept to grasp for a German. But take my word for it when I say that some people do those things.

And you keep claiming that its illegal for companies to cancel someone's account as consequence.

Please show me the EU guideline stating that. If you can't. Please shut up and realize you don't know shit.

It was always a requirement. But was temporarily paused due to technical reasons.

Now they are starting to enforce what always was a requirement.

The real fuckup is selling the game in countries where PSN is unavailable.

So no. Hate it as much as you want. But they didn't suddenly change the condition. The condition was always there.