this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
228 points (94.9% liked)

politics

18672 readers
3423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
228
Donald Trump is reportedly planning an anti-immigrant "blitz" (www.motherjones.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If Donald Trump wins back the presidency, he plans to quickly detain millions of undocumented immigrants in vast camps in Texas, try to end birthright citizenship, renew a version of his effort to ban Muslims from entering the United States, and deny visas to foreigners whose politics his advisers don’t like, the New York Times reported Saturday.

sigh And it's because of this sort of thing that I, unfortunately, have to advocate for voting for Biden, despite everything terrible he's doing right now.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Biden is a lukewarm president on a good day.

But compared to this bullshit fascist Christian sharia law ramble above he’s almost one of our only hopes.

I hope his name isn’t on the ballet this next November. But if it’s listed then we’re all in danger. This nonsense is a far right fascists wet dream.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Often in politics you gotta vote for the least shittiest option, especially when your democracy has whittled down to the two-party system conundrum.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You left off the last part. Vote for the least shitty candidate with any possibility of winning. And encourage better candidates to run and primary in the future.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

"Don't compare me to the Almighty; compare me to the alternative."

Yeah, but yuck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah the majority of the country will sadly/hopefully be in the same boat. But tbh most presidential elections are voting against one candidate versus for one candidate.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How will he do this from prison?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dudes at the UFC right now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

you saw how the crowd was cheering him on? and how the coverage kept on going back to him?

i never felt so disgusted at that organization as I did yesterday. i already knew of the infatuation between dana white and himself, but the rest of the cronies swooning around him, kissing his ass, made me rethink how much i really want to be a fan of this organization going forward.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's always been my personal impression that MMA and UFC was full of the douchiest douches in doucheville. Things like this only seem to confirm it. I don't begrudge people from watching wrestling etc. But usually with them it's at least all just an act.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

It's the repeated brain trauma and testosterone abuse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

lol you're not wrong..

the fighters that got me into the UFC were the likes of anderson silva and lyoto machida.. i don't know if you know who those are, but just picture fighters that promote humility and respect, and are just bad ass at fighting.

the instagram video in this article features the 2 main event fighters in the first ufc event i watched.. that fight was several years ago.. now they're hanging out in a living room watching sentimental videos together 😂

https://www.sherdog.com/news/news/Anderson-Silva-Explains-Bet-With-Chael-Sonnen-Resulting-in-Tattoo-191752

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

blitzkrieg against immigrants?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

And I plan to piss on his grave when he’s gone. Hopefully one of these two is more likely.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They’re going to have to bury him at sea. If they buried him on land, the grave would quickly become a Superfund site, on account of all the piss.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well it makes me happy I’m not the only one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You'll have to take up golfing then, because there is no way he won't be buried in his golf course for tax reasons. Also to charge an entry fee to all the saps willing to worship and pray to him

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh I’d pay, well at least a one time fee, to do the honor. Now I wouldn’t join “his” club for fuck sakes, but green fees one time, yeah I probably would. I’d even be discrete about it. Rig up some tube coming out of my shoe running to a sock catheter up my pants leg., bow my head in faux reverence all the while pissing on his grave. But no I haven’t put a lot of thought into this or anything. 🤣

And I’m fully aware of how juvenile and meaningless it all would be. But this man has done more damage to the country and to the people he’s brainwashed into following him than anybody will ever truly understand. He is the epitome of the greed, avarice, and selfishness that is destroying not just this country but the entire world. Fuck him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's completely legal to fly a drone over private property, just an fyi.

There's some exceptions like federal property but none apply to his shitty golf courses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You’re an evil genius aren’t you? I bet you have a really cool lair. With sharks and lasers and everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Not at all, I do I have a few cats that occasionally get pet menacingly though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Unlikely, Florida is already mad he did it with his ex wife.

Ed, err new jersey apologies

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Who is it he thinks hes going to get to vote for him that isnt already voting for him?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean the Latino vote should be near 0% buuuut it was closer than you'd think.

https://www.as-coa.org/articles/chart-how-us-latinos-voted-2020-presidential-election

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

my broader point is that Trump has gained 0 ground with any one who didn't vote for him in 2020, 2016.

It might feel good and he might be getting an emotional response from his bae (which is considerable), but he has won zero new voters with his post 2020 campaigning. If we go by the effect of actually votes cast, voting in 2021, 2022, 2023, has been an across the board shellacking for both Trumpism and to a lesser extent Republicanism. It's unpopular af outside of the circles in which it is super popular. His core is fanatical, but neither a plurality or majority outside of maybe some extreme states, an even then, I doubt it with how gerrymandered everything is.

So who is he servicing with this messaging and why? It's clearly just for his extant base. Why? I don't know. I don't think he planned to leave office and I think he sees that as his clearest past away from prison. But he won't win an election on shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

my broader point is that Trump has gained 0 ground with any one who didn’t vote for him in 2020, 2016.

I'm not so sure about that...he's polling better with black and Hispanic people than ever before, apparently. Good news it that these are early polls and feature a ton of problems that make their reliability low.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah polling seems to become less and less reliable in the last 1-4 years. Remember when the red wave was going to wipe out the "dems" and then....totally opposite happened.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Same with this election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

If polling is done by random calling numbers then you can trash any numbers cuz most of us ain't answering shit unless we recognize the number.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

What methodology is used to get those poll numbers? If they are cold-calling people they will only talk to people who are so old that they still answer unknown numbers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There's a wildly large number of Latinos that don't like people coming here illegally, even if that includes people they know.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Despite Dems going to bat for immigrants and Latinos pretty often, they're really not a reliably liberal voting block. They probably trend more conservative than anything, which is ironic, given how much the GOP generally dislikes Latinos. Which seems like a recurring problem for Democrats. They try to build this Big Tent party and look out for various groups, but yet many of their supposed voting blocs aren't really reliable when they're needed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Think? Who ever said Trump was a thinker? Even he admits he just makes decisions by reflex.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Start with all the immigrants he employs at Mar-a-Lardo