It's cognac so... No.
It's not a political thing, it's a small town thing. Tina can go three towns over and get an abortion no big deal, if she can't then the town is stuck with an unwanted kid they either all gotta watch or simply watch die.
But Diane I can clearly read. If you're going to make an insult make it logical.
Farther. He could use the military or any branch of government to kill them and still get immunity. We now have a long, don't get me wrong we always had some assumption that that's how it went but seeing it on paper is an eye opener.
Hell, he could sign literally every US asset over to anyone he pleases and there's nothing we could do via a legal means. It's not supposed to work that way but if no law constrains the office then the office is simply free to do literally whatever they want.
It doesn't need to be in a court to be a civil matter it just needs to be codified in law and not criminal. I'd say you need to take your own advice.
There's simply not, there's administrative process but literally zero "political process" exists in law in the United States. None.
I think at the moment it's if they're convicted the punishment is a violent death in prison since our prison system is at least as dog shit as any other part of the justice system.
Legally .. but the law doesn't apply to the president so long as they're doing it for a reason they believe to be official.
Sure not something that Biden can change without packing the court which he also can't do by himself.
Both are reduced under biden, no thanks to trump. He continued then and actually escalated them, the border is more secure today than at any time in human history which is an issue sure. What enabled Israel is moving the embassy to Jerusalem cementing American policy for the foreseeable future. You could find an actual issue that Biden caused but that's just me.
I agree, but implying things were better with Trump in office is next level crazy shit to say.
Are we going to pretend that working Americans haven't been struggling since mid 1980 at the very least.
That's not what they said iirc. Now everything has to be presented to determine if it was an official act, if so immunity, if not no immunity.
It's a very half hearted way to look like they're backing trump but actually throwing him to the wolves since it's not an official act and everyone knows it. It would similarly reverse clintons impeachment since lying to Congress was as president and therefore an official act.
Destructive devices yes, most are legal you just gotta be permitted and register everything.
view more: next ›
Madison420
joined 1 year ago
Buttercappuccino I read just fine.