this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
127 points (94.4% liked)

games

20516 readers
1 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It runs at 30fps on all the lowest settings on a 2070 with 64gb ram and an i9-12900K.

It is quite possibly the worst performing game I have ever seen. It's a piece of crap.

Glad I didn't pay for this shit. And I will not. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ The writing and worldbuilding is probably AI and gutter tier liberal political takes anyway.

I am absolutely stunned by just how badly this thing runs like omfg I run Elden Ring at 120fps at the same resolution. What the fuck is wrong at Bethesda? I'm so mad about this I just played Armoured Core at a rock solid 144fps and it is so jarring to go from that to this absolutely horrific performance.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Read an article on lemmy that intel cpus have a performance issue for that game!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Skill issue

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think it was GPUs but not sure. I just had a quick glance

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Saw the GamersNexus vid on performance benchmarks across a variety of graphics cards and I think I'll wait for a while before playing Starfield. I think the biggest problem with most games is that they aim to wow graphically and completely forget to optimize for a variety of hardware, especially PC.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile I'm getting slightly better performance than that with a decade old computer that's just below the minimum specs lmao.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

screm-a

I've turned it off. Can't deal with it. It's not worth feeling sick over.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

supposedly its better on Radeon cards until they fuckin fix it, because god forbid they test this shit out before hand instead of just assuming all is good because they are running them on $5000 PCs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I have a Radeon card and if this is true I do not want to know how bad it runs on nvidia

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

30fps on all the lowest settings on a 2070 with 64gb ram and an i9-12900K.

FUCK

that's way better than my rig
god damnit, i was hoping i could play the new bethesda ~~game~~ modding platform at potato quality ;_;

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It runs like assssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Pirate it and test before you drop money on this thing. I promise you the time/effort to torrent and be sure first might end up saving you regret.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I can gather it's both oddly GPU heavy and 2000/3000 series Nvidia cards are having a tough time, so you're in quite an unfortunate spot. Also is this with FSR? Cause that'd be a big oof

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

3090 here with an ultra wide monitor and running on ultra preset, game runs fine for me πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is about the worst way to go about things. What’s a great game that you wouldn’t expect?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something performs badly at launch > people complain > eventually it gets fixed by devs or community > people forget and preorder the next version, or buy as soon as FOMO hits.

Unless it gets major press like 76, cyberpunk or no man sky, it won't matter much for the company, modern captalists don't think about the long run, they want a big bonus today, and don't give a shit if the company will be dead the next year.

Also, a lot of products have bad performance at launch, especially something that depends on optimizations that may not go well with different hardware. People can just calm down and wait for it to get stable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

70 dollars for an ugly game that can't run right.

And has no FOV slider or texture options

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not understand why people try to play Bethesda games on launch. I mean, I don't understand why people play them at all, but I particularly don't understand why they play them on launch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Its so bad. Even on a 3090 I dread opening a menu

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it sucks for some people, but this is definitely an AMD optimized game. And in the time I've spent playing it, other than some funny glitches and some lighting issues, it's ran smooth on my all AMD system.

I was really surprised. I'm used to trying to play a game, only to read on a steam forum that it doesn't play nice with AMD and there is no fix.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My husband is playing it on a 3090 and whatever the 9th-generation i7 unlocked is, with the highest settings and FSR enabled, running on 1080p. 45fps in cities which is brutal. 70-80 in typical areas. Strangely, he just tried it on the lowest settings and experienced no change in FPS, and furthermore the CPU is at 100% (good on them for multithreading!), that suggests it's likely a CPU issue. Weird then that it's running so poorly on a 12th-gen i9, that should be ripping through it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

its performance in terms of being good is absolute shit as well as far as i'm seeing

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί