this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
751 points (97.7% liked)

Aged Like Milk

228 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to all those things in media and elsewhere that didn’t stand the test of time, at all.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] naught 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

didn't the UN find that they were enriching uranium past what was required for nuclear power, which indicates they're enriching it for nuclear weapons? To my knowledge this is the first time in something like 20 years that this has happened

to be clear, fuck israel for this escalation and their horrific genocide. There is no justification even if Iran had a fleet of WMDs.

I'm genuinely not sure how similar Iraq is to this

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but so is North Korea. Plutonium, that is, not uranium, but still. Who cares? Could you imagine if South Korea just randomly started bombing their "nuclear engineers" + civilians and then US piped in?

No because Kim said nice words to Trump and wrote him a love letter.

[–] naught 6 points 1 week ago

Totally agree! This situation is unbelievably stupid

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Were you too young for Iraq?

It was a bit different, Americans were baying for revenge after 9/11, but also many people were adamantly against going to war.

I think there was less evidence of any WMD, everyone knew it was bullshit, but someone had to pay for 9/11.

In this case, the USA doesn't really give a shit about Iran, nobody has a score to settle, but the killer is - and the thing I remember from last time - is that at the beginning everyone was like cut the bullshit - but as time went along the media convinced a majority it was a good idea.

The same will happen here, they just haven't had a chance to catch up yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What did Iraq have to do with 9/11?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing except that it's in the middle east and is majority Muslim.

That's all the American public needed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Depressingly accurate I think. It resulted in very large protests that achieved nothing here. I wonder if Iran would lead to even more protesting, or if support will be limited to avoid that.

[–] naught 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was too young. I realize i'm probably splitting hairs. The differences b/w both situations feel large enough that lazily conflating the two feels incorrect, even though they are certainly similar enough to compare.

Trump is somehow a more stupid, meaner W. There's no 9/11 he can use to whip up nationalistic frenzy. Israel has aggressed first & is trying to drag the world into a conflict that's already hugely unpopular. Maybe I'm hoping Middle East War # gazillion evaporates as US interest does. I'm hoping this conflict is dissimilar enough from Iraq to turn out differently, and for us to have learned something in the interceding 20+ years

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

to be fair time is much older than Iran. But it is weird they've taken 40 years to develop a nuclear weapon when designs have been freely available online for over half that time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The design isn't the issue, it's obtaining enough enriched material to actually construct it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat

~ Donald Rumsfeld

[–] Bakkoda 12 points 1 week ago

They have weapons and we have the receipts to prove it!

  • Rummy
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

call me crazy, but I think the US has WMDs, they are not responsible enough to have them

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Send in the Marines!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is there any country that doesn't have WMDs? Why is this even worth saying?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

I mean.... Iraq didn't have them until we sold them the precursor chemicals to make them. What they were really upset about was that Saddam was supposed to use all those to kill Iranians and then the Kurds.

You do a guy a favour by helping him eliminate any of his dissonance and what do you get in return? The guy tries to invade Kuwait to pay off all the money he owes for invading Iran. When did empowering ruthless dictators to do your bidding get so complicated?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Mexico (we don't know how)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably some of the very smallest ones, like the Marshall Islands or something

[–] starman2112 2 points 1 week ago

That's what they want you to think

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Monaco maybe? Oh wait no—they have many billionaires

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"why don’t presidents fight the war, why do they always send the poor"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, kings and presidents should go and hand fight their opponent and their people should watch them fight while eating popcorn and place bets, instead those low dick effort presidents and kings send innocent people to die for them, while them are hiding in their castles or bunkers. Fuck you

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your family has two TVs? You must be rich.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

We also have WMD. WMD of course being an acronym for Weird, Megalomaniacal Dictator.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Every country who is anywhere close to a genocidal rogue state who explicitly stated they intend to do a Lebensraum and has attacked them unprovoked multiple times should have WMDs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Which country are we talking about now?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

What do you mean you've seen this one? It's brand new.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, clearly it works for the people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

"people"

Are we sure?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plot twist Trump pulled a Bush by mixing up their countries and Trump actually intended to invade Iraq this time but got it mixed up with Iran (so a reverse Bush? hsub?).

[–] Goldmage263 3 points 1 week ago

Nice idea, but that would have required Trump to plan. Maybe he just said the wrong country since after every public speach his aids give him a concussion so he can start fresh next time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I got wracked in Iraq, so I ran to Iran

[–] Disaster 3 points 1 week ago

And the coils grow ever tighter.