Goldmage263

That's a really hot take; comparing Hitler to The Pope. At least, the current pope.

I'm saying that red tape and bans gets in the way of that happening for that specific scenario. By your morals, I hold the, "Let 100 guilty people go free before jailing one innocient" stance, also I'm not ok with the government being in charge of deciding when that is appropriate. Thank you for actually treating this like a discussion. I feel like it's important to have.

Why does that matter? If the fetus cannot survive outside the womb due to genetic defects, why would I care about that when I could care about the health of the mother?

Random dude is being sarcastic unprompted about someone fighting for a personal freedom. He is an asshole and an immediate problem.

More like, Schrodinger's kids. I genuinely hope you find peace and learn to not let being pro-birth justify letting others suffer and/or die. Red tape and bans kill when it comes to healthcare, without solving anything.

Yeah, it's not cool to threaten someone's genitals and remove their agency in what happens to them. Congratulations, you are currently standing on The Point.

Those two examples are wildly different from eachother. One is a medical procedure involving theoretical children, and the other has real kids getting injured and killed.

Edit: wanted to add that the medical procedure is always to prevent a major health issue when being funded by state taxes.

K. I'm going to get back to work for my company that is mass murdering children by lowering employee reproductive health. (/s)

Unsure is /s, but doesn't seem like it.

Reproductive health advocates are not mass murdering children. You're thinking of guns, drugs, and cars if you are in the USA, cancer and other genetic defects if in the UK.

As we all know, it is critically important that noone on the internet misunderstands your tone. /s

And you are more than likely to never play with the same people ever again forever. No community building, only community destruction.