this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
91 points (98.9% liked)

News

29884 readers
2843 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The pathogen is a fungus that causes blight on wheat and barley crops. No idea what the plan was, but bringing that to the Midwest could have been bad if released.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It was a post-doc student who wanted to continue his research at UMich on the fungus to develop ways to prevent blight. His peer-reviewed published research on the topic is available through google scholar: Google Scholar Link. He was wrong to try and sneak it in, but this looks like a dedicated scientific researcher making a bad decision - not an attempted terrorist attack.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

giving them benefit of doubt - they still fucked up. they should get a permit with help of their PI and bring it in overtly with all proper paperwork

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

While I'd love to believe that, the article quotes the doctor as saying he did not bring it intentionally and thinks someone else put it in his bag

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well admitting to the crime is a poor defense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Denying it confirms the intent behind the move was malicious. Wether it was done by him or anyone else, so this pretty much confirms it as an attempted attack on the US by China or at worst, a single chinese person.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the article : “Liu stated that he intentionally hid the samples in his backpack because he knew there were restrictions on the importation of the materials,” the complaint says. “Liu confirmed that he had intentionally put the samples in a wad of tissues so CBP Officers would be less likely to find and confiscate them, and he could continue his research in the United States.”

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Read the paragraph before that quote.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"But an examination of Liu’s and Jian’s electronic devices uncovered WeChat messages from 2022 in which they discussed smuggling seeds into the United States."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Replied to the wrong comment.

[–] HellsBelle -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Read every one of his 30 published Google Scholar-linked articles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No thank you. I'm just saying a doctor who doesn't follow procedure is not a good look. I really don't care about what his purpose is.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

I have bad news for you about... well, basically all of science. It's done by humans, and humans are notoriously fallible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That was only his initial story. Immediately after that, the article says he intentionally hid the samples in (used?) tissues so CBP would be less likely to find them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Academic Nerds: famously good on the spot when challenged by authority figures.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

More Interstellar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That could be apocalyptic for our food supply

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cue the conspiracy theorists losing their shit in 3... 2... 1...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Wuhan boogaloo 2, The Great Blightening

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Isn’t this how Interstellar started?

[–] neidu3 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

十二只猴子进入了聊天.

On a more serious note, this seems more like a case of poor judgment than attempted errorism.