this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
592 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3572 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not just ANY bail bond joint, "A 2nd Chance Bail Bonds" in Atlanta.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 150 points 1 year ago (10 children)

People often say they're just waiting for him to flip on Trump. Giuliani is broke, Trump disdains him, etc...

The prosecutors aren't interested in what he has to say. There are better witnesses, more reliable witnesses who have corroborated all the facts already.

The prosecutors do not need this shell of a man to flip.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it'll still be fun to watch all the worms turn on each other.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

If he flips it'll be hilarious watching him mouth vomit all the shit trump has told him.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. Trump is the main culprit and threat, so he's priority.

But taking down a corrupt former mayor? That's a feather in anyone's cap too.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Plus, Rudy isn't exactly a credible witness. He's told so many lies, so many different versions of events, and he has proven he's willing to say anything to save his own skin. The defense would tear him apart on the stand.

The only way he gets a deal is if he can provide hard evidence the prosecution doesn't already have.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Totally agree.

BUT ... if he has hard evidence like documents, recordings, emails, txts, those might be worth something and will be harder for the defense to tear apart.

Yet still, I want to see Rudy behind bars so there's that too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I expect the case is entirely airtight. They indicted a former president, and you don't do that if there's a chance you lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

At this rate they don’t need anyone to “flip”. At the end of the day these morons got busted doing illegal shit and there is more than enough evidence that they don’t need someone else’s testimony. Flip or not then are fucked.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

He won't flip, or else GRU will release the CP tapes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Should’ve chosen Four Seasons Bail Bonds.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

That only offers bail bonds for landscapers

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago

He deserves all the ridicule in the world for this, as well as anyone else involved in this scheme to overthrow a duly elected government. I will gleefully watch this trial and not feel bad about enjoying it whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If he really has to use bonds man, things are not looking too good for him. At this point he has to consider whether cooperating is the better option or not, right?

It seems to me that this will escalate rather quickly between them.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, he's out of money. Trying to sell a house for 6.5 mil. Begging Trump for cash which isn't coming.

Only a matter of time...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Prosecution doesn't need him. Rudy has lied and contradicted himself so often you simply couldn't put him on the stand. His testimony would be impeached within minutes. So his only value would be if he could provide background information that wasn't available through other means. Well they have all of his electronic devices (18 from his apartment alone!), all of his texts and emails, what else can he offer?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

At this point he has to consider whether cooperating is the better option or not, right?

That would be the smart option, not the Republican one.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh-oh. He isn't rich anymore. According to Trump, that means he's automatically a loser. Guess he won't be getting any support from the orange guy anymore, not that he was getting much.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While it doesn't automatically mean that Giuliani sees the money, Trump is apparently having a fundraiser dinner for him. So maybe he does have something on Trump, still.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like to play a game where I think of the worst thing Trump could do, and it’s most often correct. Call it Covfefe’s Razor. Trump will pocket 100% of the proceeds and use some fraction of it to extort him to keep him in line, the rest will go to Trump’s legal defense including any lawyers fixing things for Trump by ‘representing’ Rudy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sangriaferret 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who is going to buy tickets to this? Who the hell has a vested interest in keeping this sack of shit out of prison?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago
  1. Grifters who think their turn on top is just around the corner
  2. MAGA cultists who have managed to not spend every last dime they had
  3. Foreign powers looking to fan the flames of this dumpster fire
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

And yet he still had the resources to fly in on a private jet...

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As someone not from America, and having never gone to jail, what is this?

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Someone has already explained the mechanics of bail to you but from a cultural perspective it's important to note that someone going to one of these storefront bail bondsmen is interpreted as a sign that you are

  1. in an awful lot of trouble

  2. probably a person to avoid because your problems will have a tendency to become my problems

  3. broke enough that you're willing to pay punitive interest in order to stay out of jail

Normally I'd be all on my soapbox about how the bail system essentially means that poor people get punished more for the same crimes and shit like that but this guy really is an absolute monster. Back in the 90s everyone loved him for "cleaning up New York City" using the twin powers of aggressively racist policing and violence against homeless people. After 9/11 they all but made him a saint, started calling him "America's Mayor" and shit like that, but those of us who had been paying attention knew that he was a shit leader and a shit person who was benefiting from the fact that we needed someone to rally behind after the tragedy that was the 9/11 attacks. Watching him be exposed for the grifter and criminal that he always was has been cathartic for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To expand on why this isn't a good look - bail bondsmen typically charge a non-refundable 10% of bail. So if you're a former mayor who shit on your own legacy by trying to overthrow the government and your bail is set at $150,000 that means you're paying a bail bondsman $15,000 that you won't get back ever. That $15,000 is a fee that they apply in case they need to hire a bounty hunter to drag your delinquent ass to court.

A person usually tries pretty hard to raise bail without paying a bondsman because they don't want to lose that 10%. So this is basically the equivalent of Giuliani going to a Payday Loans lender to get an advance on his paycheck at a predatory rate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah just thought the pay day loans comparison from another comment.

So so you get your bond back normally if you don't break the terms of the bond? And this way they lose that deposit but they may only have 15k not 150k.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah normally you get the full amount of bail back from the court. The 10% fee is what a bondsman charges as interest / risk of your fleeing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah thanks. So this is like a pay day loan lender but for bail bonds?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Yeah, more or less. You only go to them when your other option is to sit in jail while you lose your job, car and house awaiting the opportunity to prove your innocence.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basically, if you are deemed not a risk to the community/flight risk(all arguable in this case but they did set them bail amounts), the courts give you a sum based on your accused offense you can pay to get out of jail till the trial date. If you show up to trial you get the bail amounts back, if you don't you get a warrant and the courts keep your money. Where bail "bonds" come into play, is they are companies acting as pseudo banks who will lend you money to make bail with interest obviously. It's very predatory because the only people who generally have to use these are poor people and the states don't care about poor criminals enough to make it not so predatory.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I haven’t seen bonds work like that (but I don’t doubt some do). The way they work around me is:

  1. You get a bond for $2000
  2. You go to a bail bondsman and give them the paperwork
  3. You pay 15% of your bond to them ($300 in this case)
  4. That’s it. They keep your $300 and they post your $2000 bail. You don’t get your $300 back when you go to court. But you also don’t get hunted down by a bounty hunter and you don’t get additional charges ~~for skipping~~ as long as you show up for your court date.

edit: my brain stopped working on point 4 as pointed out by @[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But you also don’t get hunted down by a bounty hunter and you don’t get additional charges for skipping your court date.

Oh you absolutely do get hunted down by a bounty hunter and get additional charges for skipping your court date. Bail Bondsmen don't take kindly to losing money because you skipped bail. If you could avoid additional charges and getting hunted down, everybody would just run to their local bail bondsman, drop 10%, and then just skip town.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you have a lot of money/property you put that up for 100% of the bail amount, which you get back if you show up to court.

If you don't have enough money/property, you go to a bondsman, pay the 10% and they put up the other 90%. You never get your 10% back even if you show in court.

So if you're gonna run, you just pay the 10%, which over the decades resulted in bail amounts 10x higher than they should be.

It's basically a "poor tax" that Rudy apparently has to pay.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

He's no dummy. He doesn't want to forfeit his own money if he decides to skip out...

load more comments
view more: next ›