this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
1846 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7361 readers
3278 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 220 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Did anyone mention how the 1930 tariffs sparked a wave of retaliatory tariffs by other nations, greatly reducing international trade, pushing a natural resources poor Japan to conclude that in order to survive it needed an empire, so it invaded other countries, committing such atrocities that even Nazi Germany was like "whoa dude, chill", which lead to their participation in WWII, Pearl Harbor and the deployment of nuclear bombs? No?

[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's quite the oversimplification, and I approve.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Haha yeah, but I could do even better:

Tariffs bad because history

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Let me help!

Monke hurt monke

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Japan was expanding long before 1930's. Korea, Mongolia, and parts of China were already under Japan long before 1930.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago

Yeah that comment is wildly ignorant of Japan's actions and aspirations pre1930. Fuck Trump and these tariffs, mind you.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 week ago (14 children)

The whole plan was to move production back to the US. The thing though is, that you can't make Americans sit and sew Jeans that sell sell for $15 or assemble electronics for $6/hr

Maybe you could 100 years ago, but there is s a reason why we trade across the world and its not because we are kind. It is because it makes companies more money.

This will be mostly messy for the US. The rest of the world now has tarrifs on the US. But US now has tarrifs on the whole world. Any other country can look into expanding in new markets now, but the US has shut all its doors

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah we can't make everything.

Not only do most of those low level factory jobs suck we simply don't have the workers, we're at less than 5% unemployment.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

we're at less than 5% unemployment

So far

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nor does the US need to make everything.

The US is a service economy. It makes money through capital and intellectual property. Being the first to innovate means also having the opportunity to wedge yourself as a permanent middle man and charge people around the world to pass go.

Think Uber eats for example. If I order food in Toronto from a Toronto based restaurant fulfilled by a courier in Toronto, 30% of my payment is going to them in silicon valley for managing that order.

Similarly, when you purchase an app on Google or Apple store, they are collecting 30%.

If I am in Norway purchasing a game on Steam from a Norwegian developer, you guessed it, 30% is going to Steam.

This is America's strength now, not making t shirts, shoes or cars entirely domesticallty.

Most of the world was ok with paying the markup for convenience.

Since the US have gone rogue, many are calling for an end for respect to US intellectual property. Perhaps each country should have its own Uber, app store etc so that the cut can stay within our borders.

One case: Uber was charging 30% commission for managing rickshaw rides in India (a country with relatively low purchasing power per capita).

It was only after domestic options like Rapido or Namma Yatri undercut them that they moved to a subscription based model, charging drivers 20 to 40 rupees daily, rather than taking an exorbitant commission of 30% per ride. To India's credit, it has a robust IT sector located in one of its major cities (Bangalore) which helps promote competition in this case.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

if anyone has any questions about getting out of the country, ask away.

I'm a long-term traveler.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (18 children)

What countries do you recommend that have the easiest visa requirements?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

at this point, visas are very easy to get in general, but Thailand is still one of the easiest and is one of the friendliest and most affordable countries around.

if you're a US citizen, you have visa-free travel in Thailand for 60 days.

if you need a visa, go to the evisa website, thaievisa.go.th, fill out the form, pay the fee, they'll email you the visa in a couple days.

I usually recommend Thailand or somewhere in Southeast Asia as a first destination. good food, great healthcare, cheap living, great people, beautiful environment, and they're very used to travelers so there are local and expat support systems nationwide.

another nice thing about Southeast asia is that there are tons of other friendly places close by.

it's about as easy to live there as anywhere else, but the support systems and the country being very used to travelers might make first time travelers more comfortable.

oh PS thailand has a lot a lot of really good all you can eat buffets for 3 to 10 dollars per person.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There was also the McKinley Tariff of 1890 that is taxed foreign imports at almost 50% and caused increased prices and consumer backlash and lead to Democrats winning Congress in a landslide.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

Aren't you glad Trump promised you don't have to vote ever again now?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's in general no way this can work long-term. When nations cooperate, they both benefit. If you're the only nation not cooperating with everyone else, then everyone else will surpass you until you're North Korea levels of yesteryear.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looking at this through the lens of "how can the oligarchs benefit", it makes complete sense - Strip all government assistance, remove social nets, add tariffs that will basically kill most small businesses (think also farms, mom and pop shops, etc). Lead to depression, billionaires swoop in and buy up land/homes/business for pennies on the dollar (or just basically crush small businesses to get them out of the way). One couldn't design a better way to fuck over everyone and enrich the oligarchs

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what happens when a populace isn't properly educated.

Prepare for this country to be on a downward slope for the rest of our lives. That's the most likely future for us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 week ago (8 children)

If I recall my history right, the 1929 stock market collapse precipitated the Great Depression, and the tariffs were a (misguided) attempt at trying to set the economy straight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

https://saifedean.com/the-fiat-standard-chapter-11

This ones got a good section on the great depression.

"The imposition of trade barriers in turn resulted in a further deterioration of economic conditions in the countries imposing them, even as their own citizens suffered from these very policies. The governments imposing such barriers, and the economists advocating them, would of course never admit that inflation, increasing centralization, and protectionist policies caused the progressively worsening depression. Instead, political leaders blamed other countries and local ethnic minorities. Years of scapegoating and growing hostility toward foreigners and minorities came to a head in 1939. The world's totalitarian fiat regimes began to turn on each other and on their ethnic minorities. Hayek had identified this threat to global peace in his “Monetary Nationalism and International Stability” lectures in 1937."

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd like to see U.S become so weak that Natives are able to reclaim their land. Imagine them scalp those nazi regime supporting mfers. Brings a happy tear in my eye.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I theorize that this is why most/all US leaders have been pro-Israel. Because if they were anything else, the native population would be like "hey, so what about us and our stolen lands?" and US leaders will absolutely not deal with that.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure it's the money. If minority groups were lobbying just as hard to both parties, the populist leaders would switch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Thanks for the insight, stacy! By the way, why are you still posting on a nazi platform? Oh for internet points? Cool, cool.

Edit: Damn, there's more nazis on Lemmy than I thought.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Because that's the platform that needs to hear it

Circlejerk preaching to the choir is fun, but doesn't reach the people who need to hear it

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

angrily looks at the "verified" badge

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Wait. I just realized something. One of the significant reasons humans are such amazing creatures compared to the other species is our generational knowledge we can pass down. But we have a saturation point. We need consciousness information downloading. Not immortality. But a way to download Wikipedia to our brains. That's the next step.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The solution to that historically has been urbanization, which allowed people to become specialists in a chosen field. They get to absorb all the knowledge in a specific field of expertise, and then a select few are smart enough to push it further.

Unfortunately we haven't really managed to apply this to politics yet, because those who are specialists in getting elected aren't necessarily specialists in governing either. Nor are they likely good at governing everything, maybe just a specific part. But picking who is suitable enough is not done by specialists but by the general public, which is both democracy's strength and weakness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I can agree with that. But something has gotta give? I think we're in the right direction, we have some significant spedbumps along the way is all

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. It's so tiring actually navigating Wikipedia. I just want a megacorp to select the best bits and inject them directly into my brain when they see fit!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

But make sure they take out anything that would negatively affect their company!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it will work. Some knowledge you just can't acquire without lived experiences.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Sure. But you don't need lived experiences to have full knowledge of economic histories or previous laws that have failed and should not be brought back. "Lived experiences" is just another bandwidth problem for most.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

Third time is a charm. No seriously this unhinged president will be the destruction of the nation as the Democrats predicted. It was fun while it lasted but since I'm not rich I'm screwed.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How did 1930 one caused a depression when we were in the 29' crack?

load more comments
view more: next ›