this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
485 points (98.2% liked)

News

27293 readers
4558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] restingboredface 30 points 1 day ago

It would be great if our legislators would serve reasonable term lengths instead of coasting on name recognition and being the lesser of two evils in reelections and literally stroking out at press conferences.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He was always a useless shill and so deep in the pockets of fossil fuel interests that he needs a 12 foot snorkel to breathe.

In other words, an absolute disgrace and COMPLETELY typical of Dem leadership of the past 40+ years

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Honestly, in one way it's nice that so many people are finally aware of Chuck's fuckery for his entire time in Congress. That people are finally able to wake up and go "Wait he's always been like this? Was I just unaware or was it down low?"

In another way, it's sad there's still people across Lemmy, Reddit, Mastodon, etc. who are happy he supported the bill with 9 other Democrats, saying that a shutdown was worse for America and giving Trump and Musk what they wanted was better.

At some point, those people are as braindead as MAGA shitheads.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

That would explain the absolute brain-dead takes he presents - beyond ~1 ft, the air exchange in snorkels doesn't work right and you end up breathing less oxygen.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

But, he hadn't sold his stocks yet! What do you expect to do?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Throw his body into the pit with the MAGAts then cover it with a few metric tons of dirt and wait for the muffled screams to die down

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would be interesting to see if he resigns. Then another point of data can be added to the ever-running observation of where actions actually have consequences in the us government.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's not going anywhere willingly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

And the rest of the dems don't have enough of a spine to force him out, so he's not going anywhere, period! Yay!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

That is not a position you are given. It is one you take.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

He looks like a caricature

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

lol R2O is showing the old stripes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So R2O is just forever barred from covering Democrats' being enablers of Trump's bullshit because he (rightfully) said "This will cost them the election against Trump, this doesn't help them or the public"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

R2O was banned for, cumulatively, months from multiple top communities for spamming. This includes an unprecedented month-long ban from politics

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Why did he get marked but Mircowave from lemmy.world didn't? That dude posts dozens articles every day to several communities, R2O never posts that much.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have no love for Schumer and would love to see him replaced, but to play devil’s advocate for a sec, isn’t shutting down the government what Trump and his cronies want? Say the government does shut down, what would prevent Republicans just leaving it shut down indefinitely until all the furloughed employees quit (the same people they’ve been trying to fire unsuccessfully)? Or passing bills to selectively fund only the programs they like while leaving the Dept of Education and others unfunded?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Trump could have simply done that by just not signing the bill and get his shutdown.

[–] WoodScientist 4 points 1 day ago

Or passing bills to selectively fund only the programs they like while leaving the Dept of Education and others unfunded?

That's exactly what they did. This wasn't a clean continuing resolution. In the bill was language that effectively retroactively legalizes Trump's ability to strip parts from the budget as he pleases. Previously he was doing this in violation of the law. Now he'll be doing it in accordance with the law, and it will be far harder for the courts to stop him.

This wasn't a continuing resolution. It was an Enabling Act.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

because in the ~~long~~ ~~medium term~~ sooner than I imagine, those things are going to happen anyway. Presenting it as a choice between "saving (some) fed employees" vs "fucking them over" is disingenuous. The actual choice is between "ceding power and the news narrative" vs not. People are upset that the Dems keep doing this, despite the long history of "working across the aisle" not working.

To address your specific points: just because there are things the Republicans want, doesn't mean they're "good" for them (see: all? of their policies). In the case of federal employees, passing the "CR"* isn't going to get them paid--the GOP doesn't care what the laws say (obviously). The Dems should be obstructing other ridiculous funding bills as well, because the only thing they can do is be in the news cycle for obstruction (and then using that time to sell progressive policies that most people agree with). That's the only leverage they have. This appeasement threw that away. The hive of scum and villainy is only going to continue their illegal cuts, and the correct response is to fight back, not to lend them more legitimacy. Dems have tried that for decades and this is what it's gotten us.

*: it's not really a "continuing" resolution, as it has a bunch of Trumpian garbage in it that wasn't in the previous appropriations bill. They're just... calling it that, and Senate Dems have tacitly endorsed it as such.