Another shameful reminder that the US constitution still permits slavery for prisoners.
Slave labor from prisons is used by the rich to depress wages of free citizens.
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
528 points (99.3% liked)
News
25226 readers
5360 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yup and when the people in power can throw millions of arbitrarily in prison for self medicating because our health care system leaves people out the help they need
So they voted for keeping slavery, but only so long as some of the slaves are paid better?
California recently voted down a public referendum to end the penal exception to the 13th amendment. So they will still have incarcerated workers working for pennies an hour, just in jobs other than firefighting. Still not good.
It's a step in the right direction. Don't let perfect get in the way of good.
I voted for that one. My disappointment in my fellow man grows larger every day :/
If they really wanted to make a change, they'd let prison firefighters become real firefighters after they got out of jail.
You’re not wrong, but I want to see both. I am thrilled that they’re at least addressing one injustice, while still advocating for more progress.
*Edit- I am hoping that this will change the perception that prison labor is somehow less valuable than civilian labor.
Frankly, I think you could make the argument that prison labor is more valuable based simply on the fact they can pay them less and get similar results. While also lining the pockets of the people running the prisons.
My question is who pays the wages of the prisoners? The state? The Feds? I highly doubt the prison is paying them directly.
This is rarely mentioned in discussions like this but volunteer work done by prisoners often results in sentence reductions. Honestly if I were in jail it feels win-win: get out of my cell for a bit and reduce my sentence? I can see why pay is less important for them
True, but most volunteer work doesn’t involve them risking their lives. If they’re doing that, they deserve to get paid well too.
I am of two minds on the subject.
On the one hand, I am a bleeding heart liberal who figures that they have definitively made it clear they can do the job so let them do it.
On the other hand, firefighters (less so the wildfire fighting variety) are often in incredibly tense people centric situations. If we had a penal system that at all cared about rehabilitation I would be all for it. As it stands... background checks exist for a reason. And I still think there needs to be much more thought rather than just "You have a record, get out".
Regardless: Fucking pay them for the job while they do it.
You have a record, get out
This I never fully understood. Isn't the point of prison/community service orders etc. for the person to be punished for the crime or repay their debt to society? In which case, after the punishment has been carried out why continue to punish them further? They've done their time and hopefully learned a lesson. I understand background checks as a form of checking a person's character for certain sensitive roles, but for everything?? Nah, that makes no sense.
American (and many other countries) penal system is about suffering, not rehabilitation.
I think that's what he's saying, the system is based on punishment and not rehabilitation so usually repeat offences and/or escalation/different crime types is quite common thus leading to the system where people who have a record at all can't do much.
If we did have a prison system reform based around rehabilitation, then it would be much easier to ban people's records from being used against them in the future
I think I remember reading something last month claiming that they're working on that reform, too.
About fuckin time and this better pass. Add a matter of fact these folks shouldn't even be barred from applying to firefighting after they down they are willing to help.
Why are firefighters in prison?
Or is it prisoners can apply to be firefighters?
Confused
Yeah, this title is less than great. When I read it, I initially interpreted as them deciding to pay full wages to firefighters who had engaged in on-the-job misconduct or something, which made no sense.
It should've read "California introduces new bill to pay prison slaves forced to labor as firefighters the same wage as free firefighters."
As I understood it, prisoners in California can be applied to be firefighters.
I hope they get proper protection.
At first I was also really confused, the title is bad imo.
Reading further into it seems to be prisoners working as extra firefighters, not "normal" full-time firefighters that were arrested lol
And then Americans wonder why Canadians don't want to join their country.
We don't even want to be part of our own country
"Introduces" is not exactly news.
Firefighter jobs cut their incarceration time in half. That's gotta be worth something in this calculation. I definitely think they should be paid more than they are, though
Only problem is they are cutting the non-incarcerated firefighter’s wages now.