this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
314 points (92.4% liked)

Fediverse

28923 readers
1581 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today I noticed a huge wall of spam from UniversalMonk from 2 different accounts and didn't initially think much of it and blocked their communities but more spam came from different communities.

At this point I checked and saw that they had created several communities which then led me down the rabbit hole to discover that their posts had almost entirely covered the new posts page of both sh.itjust.works and lemm.ee. Later on I discovered that they're posting right-wing propaganda and misinformation from breitbart, foxnews you name it.


He's already caused and stirred shit 2 months ago and clearly I can see why now.

At this point it's difficult to believe that UniversalMonk will learn proper netiquette in: not post spamming, being considerate to others, and not sharing right-wing extremist content that no one wants.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

I agree with the sentiment but this here is not a complaints forum.

Please report that user and his communities to the admins of the instances he's registered at. A quick look at the sidebars of both sh.itjust.works and lemm.ee would suggest that their admins banning him is a slam dunk.

Maybe ask at [email protected] and [email protected] what to do?

On the grounds of !fediverse not being a complaints forum, I'm going to lock this post.

[–] [email protected] 149 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

That mf is still around? And now they're spamming right wing nazi stuff, despite definitely for sure being a legitimate honest 3rd party Jill Stein Stan? My gosh, say it isn't so!

There is nothing for them to learn about "netiquette", they are a cancerous wart intentionally participating in bad faith with the entire fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It seems like every other day they are posting from a new instance.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they keep getting banned

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not as much as you'd think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

So this is the downside of the fediverse. Having the block the same person 18 times?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And now they're spamming right wing nazi stuff, despite definitely for sure being a legitimate honest 3rd party Jill Stein Stan

I fucking knew it, I commented once that he was a secret MAGAt supporter spreading FUD and bLuEMagA crap. Looks like the mask fell and guess I was right lol

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

oh I always knew it- maybe a week or two after they started spamming, I caught them posting 3 or 4 times in the /c/conservative comm with some VERY overtly racist articles. They did a great job ignoring me when I started calling them out on it though, very strange.

Edit: Here it was, they spammed a bunch of stuff, including that one particular article in the middle about Oregon's housing assistance program being only for illegal immigrants (an outright lie that only existed for racist purposes):

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

They're such fucking cowards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The very fact that someone like this is “still around “ is a damned red flag about mods at this point, probably?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why are we giving this person their stage again? How probable is it that the instance admins of the like 15 instances they have accounts on will all collectively ban him? It's just your average nazi spammer on the internet. You've read that "bio" this person has. Even if they get banned, they'll come back just on principle. Just block him like any sane person would do, leave him shadow banned like that with his nazi friends, and call it a day.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

shadow banned

Do we have that on Lemmy?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, but the more people block them, the less up votes and visibility they will receive for their posts.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

On the other hand, letting them free has the risk of making this place a Nazi bar: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Nazi_bar

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In that case I also nominate @[email protected] who pretends to be left but posts an incredible amount of conservative propaganda and misinformation in all his little communities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This fucker is still around eh? I remember him single-handedly sowing discord in c/politics around the time of the election with incessant pro 3rd party spam and insane tirades of sealioning - also report abuse if I remember right. Or at least taunting people into breaking rules and subsequently reporting them. I was amazed at the time that he was allowed to remain unbanned for ages in that sub when it was very clear what he was doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

They are at best a one-person propaganda shop, and at worst part of a targeted influence campaign by other actors.

I've written many times on this user in the lead-up to the US election, when there was cumulative evidence they were spamming content meant to split the left vote. I welcome moderate or right-leaning good faith discussion, but this user is not that. They sealion any responses with canned / apparently-LLM-assisted non-answers to legitimate constructive comments and debate, apparently to drive up "engagement" on their posts. I've read probably 30 threads where this happened - they do not answer direct questions or engage in actual debate, but immediately go into "I'm a victim" mode and turn the debate into a performative martyred "oppression" by everyone else. Effectively every response by them I've read is a misdirection and nonsense.

My strongly held opinion is that they are a bad faith actor, no matter what their motive or tools actually are. They are literally the only Lemmy user I've come across that I can say, without reservation, deserves a perma-ban.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (30 children)

I think UniversalMonk is a real person with significant mental issues. Most of the influence campaign accounts have a consistent MO, and part of the game is low effort. They want to maximize the impact with as little investment of typing and thinking as possible, because they have however-many other accounts to run and they have a quota of comments they need to write. They just have a very particular way of interacting on Lemmy that doesn't change all that much from one account to another as far as I can tell. He tries way too hard to be a normal-pattern influence operation. I think his accounts take way more work than it would be worth it to spend if he were paid by the hour. It would also be better just to have 10 accounts and have his spam of posted stories get spread out among all 10 of them instead of all comes from one.

Whether UM is a right-winger who is deliberately trying in his own insanity-tinged way to sow discord and hurt the left, or he's sincerely pursuing some cartwheeling internal compass that I'm not privy to the details of, I don't know. But I think he's a real human who is representing himself more or less authentically. Not truthfully. But all this fanatical stuff he types up is in my opinion pretty authentic to who he is as a person, if that makes sense.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's a common pattern with the "victim" crap. Same stuff I was just testing, actually. (Check my comment history with UM over the last day or so; re: define propaganda)

Very nonsensical responses, no discussion and just absolute crap posts. If it is LLM assisted, it's tuned to respond to people like they are hating on the acual article and UM. It's an easy formula: post a shit article and just argue with everyone about anything while assuming they are commenting against the post.

But I have met people just like that IRL and it usually comes with some serious mental disorders or poorly prescribed medications. (I am being extremely serious with that comment and no joke is intended, at all.) It's probably for that person's benefit to get kick-banned at all turns. Assuming it's actually one real person, social media is not where they need to be spending their time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

Oh wow. UM really is just a malignancy that refuses to go away, isn't he? I'm all for allowing different opinions but if someone keeps peeing in the pool, sooner or later you stop letting him in.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Here's the thing: without this thread, I might never have become aware of this user or their activities. Are you sure that what you're doing isn't counterproductive and giving them more undeserved attention?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

Barbra Who???

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I can see what you mean by that although for this case in an odd manner you actually want to highlight this problem.

This is another parallel system that was shown in this crazy GDC talk: 1,500 Slot Machines Walk into a Bar: Adventures in Quantity Over Quality


For background context Alex Schwartz and Ziba Scott launched premium mobile games to the Google Play Store in 2013 which unfortunately didn't "help in making our money back and being able to make enough money to make the next game". After having explored the storefront and finding nefarious apps and junk reskined clones everywhere they decided to intentionally flood the Google Play Store with junk slot machine games as a joke/experiment.

"There was a point in here that I don't think was drilled home as hard as it could have been which was... if people are sneaking by with garbage the thing that we did was to put a huge neon sign with an arrow pointing at ourselves and the garbage next to us; illuminating the entire underbelly of dark weird App Store shit and so the idea that if you do it at scale clearly they're(Google's) going to notice and clearly they're(Google's) going to change the terms of service slowly to ice you out.

Hopefully others went down with us in the wake of that. Like we provided the perfect targeted spot to drop the missile uh so hopefully, hopefully that helped get rid of duplicate apps that were also in the area."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

Oh wow, that's the first time I've seen this person's userpage and read... whatever that is.

So fucking cringe.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't care so much if he wasn't such a bitch about it. You want to post that stuff than own up and admit it. Fucking cryptofascist.

[–] southsamurai 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Eh, I just had a run-in with them again.

Trying to get every instance to ban them is a little crazy tbh, and I think you're right that their entire goal is a blend of trolling and misinformation.

It isn't crazy because they're acting in bad faith. It's crazy because just lemmy is already too big to try and organize a lemmy wide ban. Trying to get a fediverse wide one applied ain't happening.

Best you can do is report them for the spamming in the instances they do it on.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

100% if he is breaking the ToS on multiple instances (and I would argue that spamming most likely is, not to mention the substance of the content)

He can always create his own instance and anyone who wants to see his content can join it as well. Instance admins shouldn’t feel obligated to give anyone a platform (ahem, .world), the fediverse is decentralized and democratic.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Posting lying terrorist dens like breitbart or fox as news is ban-worthy on its own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (7 children)

It blows my mind that the admins of UniversalMonk-affected servers don’t just ban him on sight.

Guys: You’re being too nice. I get it, you want to be inclusive. But you have to draw lines. Someone doesn’t have to be telling racist jokes or something, in order to be clearly and unapologetically a net negative to the community in every possible sense. And, showing them firmly to the door doesn’t have to be a complex or “objective” process when that happens.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

oh, that tard's still around? I blocked him months ago.

I can affirm my experience has been all the better for it, so yes, the rest of the fediverse should throw the Nazi out of the bar.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Everyone wanted to know how it would go for the "I just want people to support a 3rd party" folks after the election... Well, now you know!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jjagaimo 26 points 2 days ago

Seems like he does get banned frequently by mods, given he has like 10 accounts created on a number of servers in the past few months

load more comments
view more: next ›