woelkchen

So who gets to pick what’s a lawful request and criminal activity?

Probably Telegram themselves. Durov was forced into exile by Putin.

I think this is conscription by another name.

It's just formalizing an existing practice initially established by Wagner with the government's approval.

Is gtk not backward compatible with older version?

New main versions of software usually is not compatible with old versions. That's one of the points of new main versions. You cannot load Qt 3 themes into Qt 6 either.

Suyu and Sudachi both ended up discontinuing developmemt and haven’t been updated in months

I don't think Nintendo lawyers read this. You can just tell the truth and not blatantly lie.

I see you understand what I'm currently rewatching. 🤖

In the same stroke though the onus to supply backing to any given position or assertion is on the one claiming facts.

Valve supporting gaming on Linux is common knowledge here. For very niche knowledge or hard to google terms, I'd agree but there's a limit. One cannot expect to cite sources for every single bit of common knowledge.

This one is easily found out through a simple search and all but burden of proof isn’t on the one asking for proof

The amount of work required to ask for a source is similar to googling it directly, maybe asking is even more work because usually selecting the claim and then right-click --> "Search web for XYZ" works just fine.

Nintendo wouldn’t be able to go after him for like DMCA type route.

Old school suing about "aiding and abetting" piracy until the defendant has no money left to pay lawyers works pretty much all over the world.

An "agreement" is no court order, so this is perfectly legal:

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:064e5b164d448076c510c98f173435d19028311c&dn=ryujinx-a-2c-0035013-entire-git-history.tar&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt1.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt2.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&ws=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdownload%2F&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fia600601.us.archive.org%2F19%2Fitems%2F&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fia800601.us.archive.org%2F19%2Fitems%2F

It’s my understanding that the creator took a payout.

AFAIK the only statement so far is "agreement" and that that can also mean a legally binding document to take down Ryujinx and never again develop Nintendo emulators or get sued to the moon and back, ie. "sign here or financial ruin".

no it isn’t. The old versions are still GPL. permission from contributors was attained.

Stripping copyright information is a violation of the GPL. friend_of_satan meant that. He clearly did not mean changing the license with consent of all contributors.

it’s not my turn to Google things

It always it. That's basic media savviness. Asking for things that take 5 secs to google is rude.

I thought Japan was all about Face. I guess Nintendo is the exception?

face, farce.