this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
812 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2174 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

If he were smart enough to listen to anyone he would be in this position.
Keep on talking buddy!

[–] wheeldawg 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

His lawyers need to STFU fr.

This is the real Superbowl. A coworker of mine told me he treated Election Day as the super bowl each year, taking the day after off so he could stay up and watch the content all night.

I'm starting to see his point. I have paid attention to so much more political news the last couple years than I ever did before, and I'm really looking forward to this conference and the coverage of it afterwards.

True story coming up. I had a pretty major surgery the night of the Georgia run off election. The very first thing I asked when I remembered how to talk was "did Herschel lose?" I don't live anywhere near Georgia, but I just really had to know if that stupid fucker ended up losing. Last I knew when I got put under was it was pretty even, but way too early to call.

I woke up and after seeing all my siblings come to visit, I asked about politics. None of them had a clue what I was talking about. But I finally got motor control back and turned the room TV on to check on it. I don't think it was yet called at that point, but it was soon after. I was so happy. I don't know much about Warnock, but at least he won't be trying to join werewolf committees.

It was still way closer than it any business being.

Sorry about the random rant, that memory just hit me while I was typing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well I mean he is their client so technically, legally they have to do everything they can to the best of their ability to win. That said, they are fucking stupid for taking him on as a client. I can't believe he can even still get lawyers. Knowing how badly he's scraping the bottom of the barrel, all I can assume is that he is finding the most desperate, pathetic, trash lawyers in the entire system at this point. The ones who scraped through school with a C- average.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nah. My favorite team actually made the super bowl recently. They lost, and it sucked. I was kinda upset about it for maybe a day, but there were no real consequences.

There are definitely funny moments that pop up with Trump's illegal shit. The 4 seasons landscaping presser, and potentially this one, etc, but overall, if my "team" loses this whole thing, then it's going to be a real problem. For everybody.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For the first time in my life, I want to watch Trump's press conference, and I really, really hope he actually does it. Seems weird for him to chicken out now.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Be right back. I'm creating 50 truth social accounts and messaging him to show us what a real strong leader he is and go through with it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Be sure to say something about how DeSantis would do it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bonus points if it's in front of Four Seasons Lawn Care.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What do you think they are stupid? They have booked a venue at Ritz-Carlton..s Tire and Lube.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Oooooohhhh you wanted The Ritz. I booked a Ritz. You'll be standing in front of a giant cracker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GODDAMN LAWYERS DON'T YOU TAKE THIS FROM US

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, Trump can be counted on to not follow his counsel's advice

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The headline reads: "Dumbass stomps on his own foot, blames Biden".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

And suddenly there are1,000s of Truth Social posts talking about the "Shoe Deepstate"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn't a trump 5d chess thing or whatever but it might honestly be the smarter move for him to just keep riling up his base and make it a guarantee riot if he gets jailed.

Seems pretty likely he's fucked legally so he's put in a situation that breaking law and order is probably his best move.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

give your enemy a golden bridge to retreat across

I'm fearful we are backing him into a corner and his only option is to order his tens of millions of rabid followers to create chaos.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m fearful we are backing him into a corner and his only option is to order his tens of millions of rabid followers to create chaos.

It didn't take him being backed into a corner to do that on Jan 6th. Since he's done it before and you're positing he'll do it again when threatened legally, there's no difference in outcome. The legal structures and framework should be followed through with the arrest and trial as planned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Isn't he being prosecuted for doing exactly that already?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree with the message and hope he gets what's coming to him, but what is this source? To quote:

Trump’s Lawyers Ask Him to Cancel Press Conference on Georgia Election Before He Makes Matters Worse, Jon Karl ReportsKarl noted that between Trump’s enraged reactions to his fourth indictment, Trump announced on Truth Social that he would hold a press conference on Monday where he would produce a “Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable Report” that will supposedly prove he was right that Georgia’s 2020 election results were “rigged” by mass voter fraud.

That's a one sentence paragraph with the nineteen-word title (from another source perhaps?) injected as the subject.

Is this what AI-driven journalism looks like?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm utterly convinced he wants to run from prison. His cult followers would worship him more

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LMAO I hope the court trial is televised. I don't think he can contain himself when he knows he has an audience.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

It will be. Only federal court blocks cameras

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

"Never interrupt your enemy's foot in mouth disease" - General Tso Chi Kin

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like we should all make accounts on true social to triple dog dare him to ignore the lawyers, and do the press conference. I'll pop the popcorn.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, there's probably plenty of real supporters doing just that.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Dang! They are killing all the fun! I would have loved to see him either lying with more invented "evidence" and get slapped by the court for this, or just spewing stupid nonsense that makes him even more of a laughing stock.

Bonus: He could have threatened even more people he shouldn't, getting him a nice "Go To Jail Go directly to Jail. Do not pass GO, do not collect $200" card.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Good if his lawyers are actually competent. Maybe he'll listen to them this time. A good trial requires a good defense.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Donald Trump hasn't listened to anyone (who doesn't already agree with him) since his father died. These lawyers are smart enough to know that. This leak is all about making sure that when Trump does the dumb thing anyway, they don't get disbarred over it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This leak is all about making sure that when Trump does the dumb thing anyway, they don’t get disbarred over it.

Why even represent him in the first place if he is such a massive risk?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Money. Then again, he doesn't pay. If they're smart, they will have somehow accounted for this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A hefty retainer fee hopefully.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see you've met my orthodontist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Because everyone needs representation, and they probably convinced him to pay up front.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This might be a little bit reductive, but I'm pretty sure you can tell that they're not competent lawyers because they are Trump's lawyers.

He's known to ignore his lawyers, lie to them, refuse to pay them, and throw them under the bus. I can't imagine a competent lawyer wanting that client. Maybe someone just looking to get their name plastered everywhere, aka some kind of grifter, but definitely not a competent lawyer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm not interested in a 'good' trial. This isnt a netflix drama.

Bruh. Whats so great about this is the schism that’s appeared between Trump supporters and literately everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You should be. Otherwise there's grounds for a mistrial and we're right back where we started.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He ought to just shoot himself in the dick.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No…stop…don’t go in front of the camera’s Mr Trump…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump's only chance is probably to foul the magisterial process as much as possible to prevent it from holding him accountable. It's worked for him so far, and even if he is taken into custody, that will only increase his popularity and stoke outrage. There's nothing for him to lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I'd love to show you the report, it's beautiful, and perfect, and it shows in so many ways how I'm innocent of all charges. My lawyers wept when they, true story! My lawyers were VISIBLY WEEPING as they read it. VISIBLY! But now, on the advice of those lawyers, I can't release it to you. I CAN'T! I want to, but I can't. They tell me it would tell these evil, nasty, prosecutors too much about our defense, so, you know, we can't have that."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All day long, all we do as a nation is stare into the swirling toilet, unable to look away

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Please let him ignore rational advice again this time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

No let this train wreck continue. If he has evidence to exonerate himself he would have never been indicted in the first place

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I think he should weave as much rope as he wants.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Don't listen to them, Donny Doo-doo. You just keep dribbling that shit from your pie-hole...there are starving dung beetles in Africa, dontchaknow!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Varyk 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great legal advice, I'm sure he'll prudently adhere to their suggestion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›