this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
812 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn't a trump 5d chess thing or whatever but it might honestly be the smarter move for him to just keep riling up his base and make it a guarantee riot if he gets jailed.

Seems pretty likely he's fucked legally so he's put in a situation that breaking law and order is probably his best move.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

give your enemy a golden bridge to retreat across

I'm fearful we are backing him into a corner and his only option is to order his tens of millions of rabid followers to create chaos.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m fearful we are backing him into a corner and his only option is to order his tens of millions of rabid followers to create chaos.

It didn't take him being backed into a corner to do that on Jan 6th. Since he's done it before and you're positing he'll do it again when threatened legally, there's no difference in outcome. The legal structures and framework should be followed through with the arrest and trial as planned.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

True, and I'm not saying by any means he shouldn't be prosecuted. The consequences of letting these actions go unpunished are way more severe than any riot. I guess I'm just apprehensive because I just don't see how this won't end in violence one way or another.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Isn't he being prosecuted for doing exactly that already?

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least this time he doesn’t have an official military or nukes.

[–] agentsquirrel 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Official" military... There are plenty of extreme right wing supporters of Trump in the military.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I get that, but I’m talking about an official government military as a whole, not the bad actors who want to overthrow the government. Wasn’t sure how to differentiate that or if it was necessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who cares? That's what law enforcement is for. They can and will use force against violent numbnuts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Tens of millions of heavily armed uneducated morons pissed off who've been ordered to burn the place down by their Messiah, yeah, no way that wouldn't fuck our shit up real good.

I mean I'm definitely for moving forward prosecuting all of these cases and hopefully putting this asshole in jail. But we should be very aware that this could easily slide out of control and prepare accordingly.