this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
506 points (99.8% liked)

politics

19296 readers
2187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 Republican-led decision, blocked certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs as the winner of a state Supreme Court race.

Riggs leads Republican Jefferson Griffin by 734 votes after recounts, but Griffin claims 60,000 ballots were illegally cast and seeks to have them invalidated.

The court will now hear Griffin’s challenge, with briefs due by January 24.

Democrats criticized the move as partisan, while the lone Democratic justice dissented, arguing there is no basis to delay certification or disrupt the election process.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol.

We're literally going to let anti-democratic shitstains abuse the fuck out of our institutions, wearing them down, until they can simply assume and not give up power because our institutions are too stretched thin and weakened to do anything about it.

Holy fuck our founding fathers would be utterly ashamed.

If you're a history buff interested in the fall of Rome, this time period in America must be utterly terrifying and fascinating to witness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

Also 1933 Germany. Although Hitler only got about 35 percent of the popular vote, so facism in the US right now is actually more popular than it was in Germany when the Nazis took over.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is how it's going to go down in every Republican-led government from now on. They learned that nobody will do shit to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

That would have been on voters to stop them for being undemocratic. But nope. Just voting along party lines all the way to hell.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

The only reason this is even a case is because of the National elections and Trump's actions that he was held unaccountable for apparently.

The changes in North Carolina were among the most extensive state voting reforms passed last year and continue a trend among Republican state legislatures, many of which have passed laws since 2021 adding new voting restrictions. The laws were pushed through after former President Donald Trump began falsely claiming that widespread fraud cost him reelection, claims that have resonated with many Republicans.

Democrats in North Carolina and elsewhere have criticized many of the new laws as attacks on voting rights that often target minority and low-income voters. North Carolina’s changes in 2023 were pushed through without any Democratic support by Republican lawmakers who hold a super-majority in the legislature. They overrode a veto by Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, whose final term ends this year. (link)


If Trump had been held liable for election interference /fraud / misinformation, you wouldn't have people down ballot having the courage to be so shady. If the Democrats actually tried relinquishing some of their control over elections, we might have a system that was fair and honored the citizens participating (they do very little in the way of FPTP problems like informing their base and usually step in to stop changes)

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But hey, Democrats relinquished power without resistance on January 6th and had a snowball fight, so they are The Real Winners!

It got this bad when things were better, and the democrats of today still seem to be the democrats of two decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

If the republican had won, it would be all good: no interference just the will of the people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

A snowball fight?

[–] [email protected] 181 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is what Trumps blabbing about war with Greenland is covering up.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago

Trump: "oh shit, they're on to me!.... I'M GOING TO INVADE THE ANTARCTIC AND SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND TOO!!!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

No, he is serious about that. It’s on his Putin to do list to destroy US alliances in the Baltics.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cut my life into pieces, this is THE Supreme Court

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Adjudication, no briefing

Don't give a fuck about this proceeding

🎸

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Thank you and the person above you for making me literally LOL

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 2 days ago (41 children)

Sounds like subverting the will of the people. Arm yourselves, friends.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

Women, blacks, LGBT folks and other minorities already got the memo. Largest gun buying demographic for years. Suburban white boys need to sign on.

"But they might shoot me!"

They're going to anyway.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why don't Republicans look like real people? Is there some kind of shop they're made in?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

This dude looks like he needs another punch in the face to straighten it out

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Inbreeding. When 51% of your base is told their primary purpose is to breed, and they're all prejudiced against people that don't look exactly like them... you get a lot of "low-quality AI" faces and brains.

[–] BrundleFly2077 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every single time I see the professional headshots these people use I wonder this exact thing. To ground things in reality for a moment, is there a cultural component to the upper class far right that makes them more likely to undergo multiple cosmetic surgeries?

These aren’t normal heads on these people.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I honestly think a lot of them are sociopaths. Not to say all republicans are sociopaths, but sociopaths are going to lean republican, especially when seeking power like in politics. They don't feel emotions like normal people and it shows in their smiles, which don't look genuine. They're smiling with their mouth but their eyes just look dead.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He looks exactly like a Skibidi toilet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weird I understood the difference but I had the two terms mixed up. Thanks for the correction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's a very common mistake

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Prepare to see a repeat of this in 2028, but federally

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah this won't happen. Because there will likely not be an election. Or there will be an "election" with Trump winning 100% of the vote.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

They wouldn't make it that blatant. A sham election is a lot more convincing when they do something like rigging it to ensure Trump wins by razor-thin margins in every swing state.

[–] Bakkoda 7 points 1 day ago

120% of the vote. Can't set a record for the bestest biggestest vote with a measly 100%

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That man’s picture is off putting

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Looks like we need a Supreme-Supreme Court to solve this issue.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you know that in France they call a Supreme Supreme Court “le guillotine?”

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

We are much more civilized than that

Meme

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›