this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
1388 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9879 readers
940 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 109 points 6 days ago (43 children)

My favorite retort to those advocating for running over protesters:

If it's OK for you to run over protesters blocking your path on the highway, it's also OK for me to set fire to your car if you park it in the bike lane.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My ex father in law was badly injured running into a car broken down, parked in a bike lane (there wasn't anywhere else they could have stopped). He was training for a triathlon which he didn't get to participate in, nursing two broken arms

Sometimes even without the help of arseholes your bike lane may be blocked. Look up regularly, people.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (14 children)

there wasn't anywhere else they could have stopped

so there wasn't a road?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The "logic" goes like this: (sarcasm)

It's ok to burn down the planet for profit. It's ok to destroy the ecosystem on which we all depend for food, clean water. It's ok to make bombs and sell them to those dropping them on hospitals and children. It's ok to pollute the air with deadly particles no one can avoid.

But you just CANNOT... you just CANNOT be in a way of someone carrying a few tons of steel of a metal cage through a city. That's not something that we as a society will accept

[–] [email protected] 61 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Can any lawyers answer this:

If the person driving that vehicle did end up running someone over, and had that sign in the window, would they get an elevated charge?

To me, that sort of thing is like premeditation, and it would be extremely hard for me to believe that an “accident” led to them killing someone with their vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Not a lawyer, but I think stuff like this is a minefield. The defense would try to get it thrown out as prejudicial and without the suspect testifying all they could do is show a picture to an officer of it who affirms that he saw it on the car and enter it into evidence, but they could only indirectly talk about it in opening and closing because nobody can personally testify about the motivations behind the sticker.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

But if the defense was "I panicked and hit the gas when people surrounded me" this is something that would poke quite a few holes in that argument.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It could, its just hard for the prosecution to handle. Because it's not direct evidence of the mindset for that incident and it's inflammatory to the jury the chances of it being ruled as prejudicial and not probative is high. That's why past criminal convictions are also often excluded from trials.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Not a lawyer but, premeditation isn’t what you think it is; one can premeditate an action in seconds, the concept really just conveys that the individual had time to think of the consequences.

But yeah, a sticker like this would certainly hurt the case of any defendant. It wouldn’t likely get them any modifiers (though it would help), but it could definitely affect a judge’s decision on how much time they should serve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago

Should we tell them their family joined the protest?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›