this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
390 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59525 readers
3890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

sell it to Microsoft so they can finally have a web browser that people use

[–] explodicle 2 points 35 minutes ago

Never again

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 minutes ago

Hey look, some boomers who don't understand tech are trying to do a thing with a tech company. Sell Chrome? What a stupid idea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Who would buy this and how would they monetize it? In browser ads? A freemium paid model to remove the ads?

[–] explodicle 4 points 33 minutes ago

I'll bid $3.50 just to GPL it.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is the last antitrust win we'll get for years, isn't it?

I know Trump doesn't like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

[–] babybus 40 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

Microshit treatment incoming IMHO

People larp these headlines too much

[–] [email protected] 58 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly what will happen. Same thing with Albertsons and Kroger too.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Okay but consider them taking this moment to let Elon buy it and using it to control information on the clients end 💀

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 2 hours ago

Maybe we'll actually see people switch to Firefox if that happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Hot take: they sell Chrome but keep Chromium.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

How would that work exactly? Google would sell Chrome but keep paying teams if developers to work on Chromium?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 26 minutes ago

Basically. I mean look at Edge, it’s running Chromium under the hood, but the UI is developed by Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

Seeing how tech illiterate some of these people are, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what ends up happening

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

The obvious benefit is that they can default the user's search provider to Google.

But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don't have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

If they don't like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don't like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

They're doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Just...please for the love of whatever dirty do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I'll say what I've said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I'm all in. By what I've heard though it's just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I've heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 minutes ago

You owe it to yourself to try it out! I recommend dual booting into Linux Mint Cinnamon for a while and have your windows install to fall back on to. That or one of the gaming-specific distributions, but from what I’ve seen Mint does all with gaming too. It’s a good all-around starting place, and there are a lot of resources because it’s popular and built off of the most popular distro. I installed it on my work machine (software engineering) and I’ve felt no lack of capability or a need to switch to a more “hardcore” distro.

[–] Grandwolf319 1 points 50 minutes ago

Microsoft is waaay easier to avoid than fucking google. Is one drive that annoying?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

All mega corps but it won't happen

[–] TriflingToad 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There's literally so much else they should do, google docs, sheets, drive, phones, maps, earth, calendar, play store, translate, etc.
Good work, continue please.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What is the issue with docs, sheets, drive, phones, calendar, play store?

There seems to be plenty of options in all of these spaces. Play store isn't even on a lot of android devices.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Correct. My example for another necessary intervention would be YouTube. That's a space in which Google does have a monopoly.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Exactly. There are workable alternatives to most of the others, but YouTube has a stranglehold on that type of content due to the network effect. Examples of alternatives:

  • docs/sheets/drive - Microsoft Office 365, OnlyOffice, or self-host LibreOffice Online (through Collabora CODE builds); if you just need drive, there's also BackBlaze, AWS, DropBox, etc
  • phones - I use GrapheneOS on their Pixel devices, but plenty of other Android phones support LineageOS/DivestOS/CalyxOS
  • calendar - still looking for a replacement for my smart watch, but I've been using my Nextcloud install; there are also some FOSS calendars that support CalDav as well, so look around
  • maps - I've been using Organic Maps, which has been great; main problem is searching for addresses, but if it's in there, the directions so far have worked fine; there's also Apple maps, Bing maps, and probably some others
  • translate - it's built in to Firefox, and it seems to work well enough in a pinch

But there's really not much for YouTube. I guess there's Odyssee, Rumble, and a few others, but they don't have anywhere near the content as YouTube, so they're not really practical alternatives. I actually sub to Nebula which is the closest to a replacement so far, but there's still a ton of content that doesn't have a direct replacement there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

Off topic, but how do you like graphene? I am thinking of making the switch on a pixel 7a, but I have a fear it'll be like having Linux on my phone where things randomly don't work and then I have the hobby where I make it work

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 20 minutes ago

I really like it, but I also mostly use F-Droid apps. You can install Google Play in the regular app sandbox, which prevents the worst of the issues andn provides most of the benefits.

That said, there are still some caveats:

  • NFC payments don't work - I use a Pixel watch instead, which works fine (it's paired to a separate profile on my phone with Google Play installed)
  • some banking apps don't work (some check if your phone OS is stock)
  • some apps just don't work without Google Play services running (e.g. the Sensi app for my smart thermostat), and some have issues even with it running

But other than that, it works pretty well! I have three profiles set up:

  • Owner - default, with no Google Play
  • Work - handful of work apps using my work Google account
  • Google - apps that require Google Play, using a fresh Google account

I'm using a Google Pixel 8, and it does what I need it to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Most definitely. They need viable competition.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I'm honestly curious how this would "harm Americans".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 31 minutes ago

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that's left.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 40 minutes ago

How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it's own is not a business.

Say you buy chrome, you have to options

  1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you're in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

  2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

Neither of these options are better than the status quo

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

I fear this is exactly who they're courting.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about "Americans" they aren't talking about us schlubs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

The corporations are people too!

[–] [email protected] 63 points 9 hours ago

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

If they're allowed to choose who they sell it to this won't change anything

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

Sell it to Mozilla so they can make it uninstall itself and install Firefox instead in the next update

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›