this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
734 points (98.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27156 readers
2973 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Technically, no. People have been turned away for DUI's from decades earlier. But, as the other reply said, Trumpitler has "immunity."

[–] sentient_loom 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So it's like he's been vaccinated.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also like Alberta’s premier would slobber all over that carrot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Quite the visual

[–] Kecessa 13 points 1 month ago

They're allowed if they fill up the right paperwork and it's approved by the Canadian border service agency, it's not about immunity, it's a process that exists for anyone with a criminal record, the difference is that Trump will be approved automatically just like Bush was 20 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Diplomatic immunity, technically felon trump isn't stepping into the country, there is a bubble of "USA" around him.

Physically he is there, but whatever country's jurisdiction doesn't apply to him. Or any diplomat for that matter. 😓

Edit: To clarify, it doesn't mean he has the right to enter any country. A country can still declare a person "persona non grata" and ban people from entering including head of states, although I doubt any country is gonna deny the leader of the most powerful country (in terms of military strength) from a official visit because his convicted felon status.

Diplomatic immunity is just gonna be the excuse a country uses to bypass any law in a country that may prevent a foreigner from entering.

[–] Kecessa 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's not how diplomatic immunity works, it's for crimes committed inside the host country, the host country can refuse entry to anyone, even diplomats or presidents. Just because you're the president of the US it doesn't mean you can just show up in any country.

Just like Bush for his DUI, Trump will need to have the paperwork necessary to be granted access to Canada as a person with a criminal record.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My comment has been edited to clarify what I meant.

[–] Kecessa 9 points 1 month ago

And your comment is still wrong. Diplomatic immunity has nothing to do with the process any foreigner with a criminal record can go through to visit Canada. It's paperwork and it's the same thing Bush was doing to visit Canada while he was president 20 years ago.

https://ircc.canada.ca/english/helpcentre/answer.asp?qnum=142&top=8

Again, diplomatic immunity is about things the person does while inside the host country if they're acting as a representative of their country and it only protects certain people, not anyone sent by a country and in Canada it doesn't even apply to presidents/premiers/kings of foreign nations.

[–] sentient_loom 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

there is a bubble of “USA” around him.

I like this visual. It's like a force field.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

More like a fart cloud

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's not how diplomatic immunity works. A nation is welcome to ban entry to any foreign national.

Diplomatic immunity is for crimes commited within a foreign nation. It's also worth notting that the immunity can be revoked as well by the nation that said foreign national is from, there by allowing them to be arrested and tried under the local justice system.

[–] HenriVolney 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How does it work when the diplomat / head of state has been sentenced by an international court for war crimes or crimes against humanity?

[–] Kecessa 3 points 1 month ago

The host country can recognize it and arrest them... or not. Technically Mongolia should have arrested Putin when he visited not too long ago, they didn't because that would have been political suicide.

The international court is a completely different beast from a national court.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Until he's sentenced, he's free to walk around. His sentencing hearing is scheduled for November 26.

However, if he appeals, expect him to continue to walk around free until the entire appeals process is completed.

Now a convicted felon can forget about traveling to Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland. They share the U.S.'s felony database.

You can still visit 99% of the rest of the world, though. Just need to not apply for any visas or ever fill out any customs paperwork admitting to it.

Every country that says ‘Visa not required’ or ‘Visa on demand’, should be good to go. That includes Japan.

Now, If a country has an ‘eVisa’, ‘ETA (Electronic Travel Authority)' or ‘Visa required’, he'd probably won't travel to those

[–] Kecessa 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

For the fifth time, he just needs to fill up some paperwork and the Canadian border service agency decides to allow him in or not, the same right is given to any person with a criminal record visiting Canada.

George W. Bush has a record for DUI and the same process was necessary whenever he visited Canada, they never prevented him from entering the country, just like they'll never prevent Trump from entering Canada.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Big difference between letting in someone with a DUI and someone who is a convicted rapist

[–] Kecessa 1 points 1 month ago

Doesn't matter, the process to ask to be allowed in is the same.

Also, in this specific case, the rape accusations were in civil court so they're not accusations that would prevent him from entering Canada. The charges that made him a felon are the ones related to the hush money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah I read your comment after and didn't knew how to redirect to it from mine. Thanks for clarifying

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

You can be free to walk around but that doesn't mean Canada has to let you through immigration.

[–] Kecessa 12 points 1 month ago

Trump will be granted access the same way Bush was (he has a DUI), there's paperwork necessary that wouldn't be if he didn't have a record and that anyone can fill up in the same situation, entry will be granted by default for Trump, that's the main difference.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Is commander in chief an active military position?

Pretty sure that's a bit of a loophole, he rides on Airforce One.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is commander in chief an active military position?

I think it's specifically not a military position. The president being a civilian is how in theory the military must operate under civilian control.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This may be offtopic, but what do the third and forth flags next to the name of the creator of the post whose screenshot is being posted here mean?

[–] sentient_loom 7 points 1 month ago

Georgia and Moldova.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

3rd is Georgia (the country, not the state). 4th is Moldova.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know the countries, i was asking why they were next to the name

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Georgia and Moldova both are struggling against Russian influences in their elections.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

he's building a list of all the countries he's been to or wants to go to

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

He can pardon himself of it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Well, do they give the answer in the article? Kananaskis?