this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
377 points (98.5% liked)

Avatar: The Last Airbender

1389 readers
1 users here now

A community for all things related to Avatar: The Last Airbender, Legend of Korra, cartoon or live action TV, movies, comics, novels, etc.

Rules:

Please report any rule violations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's evidence he was trying to prevent worse things from happening. He hid the last dragons, he joined a extremist group, he was WAY ahead of Azula capturing him, his prison escape plan was likely a long term thought process he already had. Iroh was never going to be fire lord.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was first in line to be Fire Lord until his son died.

I don't think Iroh would have been as ruthless as his brother. But he did see conquest as a sort of duty.

But then his son died, and he realized that it was all pointless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I want them to dive into exactly that in NATLA, more than they already have.

Maybe it's just me, but I'm really enjoying it as an 'AU' that explores some off-screen scenes and implications from the original. I think people are getting too hung up on it being 'not ATLA' (just like LoK).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I keep meaning to give that a try, but after Shyamalan... No. Just the memory of that is enough to give pause.

Also, Netflix live action has been... well, never quite as good as the original. They often don't lean into the genre as hard as they need to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

What Shyamalan movie?

(Seriously, it's nothing like the movie).

And it's fine, its entertaining and a spectacle with some emotional moments. I mean, it depends what else is in your TV queue, as there's a TON to watch these days, but I wouldn't skip it just because it's not ATLA.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

People change, we should all learn to see people for who they are, not who they were.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I'm not sure siege is considered a war crime. Isn't that just standard medieval warfare?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The other nations wouldn't see it that way.

There's no central authority, but it's not a machiavellian free-for-all like medeival Europe. The rest of the world was rather unhappy with the Fire Nation's aggression, even in light if the world's long history of warfare. He would be tried for that, no doubt.

And his reputation/nickname is subtext for crimes he did commit but that the cartoon couldn't spell out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I mean, that's essentially saying it's a war crime to be in the military during a war. Which is kind of silly to put it like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He's Ozai's brother and a general, a leader of the Fire Nation, not just some regular soldier.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

A general isn't just some regular conscript, or enlisted soldier.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean really the existence of war crimes relies on the existence of treaties between the nations defining what those crimes are. Gonna guess the Fire Nation was not a signatory.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Nazis weren't signatories to the Nuremberg charter, yet they were judged by it. So there is precedent for judging war crimes without pre-existing law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm also not exactly sure how international law works in a world that only has ~~four~~three countries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe it's like original sin, and any general in the same army that destroyed 25% of the world's nations, is automatically a war criminal?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it's not a war crime that I can find, however we can attribute harm caused to civilians through these actions, such as starvation due to supply lines cut off. So he did some vile shit, had a moment where he realized the error in his ways, then did everything in his power to make things better.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Except there no evidence of starvation in Ba Sing Se. After all, there was so little impact that the citizens could be convinced that there was no war.

As to supply lines, earth benders cannot be locked in by a siege. They can create tunnel networks with a literal wave of the hand.

So you're inventing crimes that didn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Depends on the culture The Japanese viewed siege tactics as cowardly and armies at the gates would deliver food and supplies to the people in the walls. Ba Sing Se was able to convince it's citizens there wasn't even a war going on, I don't think they were starving or being killed with siege weapons.

[–] DannyBoy 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Varrick bombed buildings and tried to kidnap a president to start a war for profit and got away with it too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

He did it as a capitalist though so it's no big deal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If Varrick were real, he would have blown himself up because he had a hissy fit, threw his briefcase at the wall, but forgot there was a bomb in there.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well he does leave the army and help the opposition so I'd say he redeemed himself hard

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Not only does he help the opposition, I'd argue he was one of the most involved people in bringing peace to the world, between everything he did to train Zuko to become a great leader and all the ways he helped team Avatar, I think the world would have turned out far darker if Iroh hadn't existed.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A war crime according to... Who? Is there some treaty or convention that happened? Is there some customary international law that he violated? I can't find the Hague anywhere on any maps in this universe but maybe I missed something.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

There is no war

[–] mindbleach 2 points 3 months ago

"Is it really murder if this fictional setting isn't allowed to say 'killed?' I don't understand how concepts work."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like how NATLA goes into his "war crimes" more.

And Lu Ten's funeral... I cried over that scene.

There's a lot to not like about live-action atla, but I was there for all the Iroh/Zuko scenes. Kinda like Book 1 of ATLA, to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I agree, I love the change they made to include the fact that Zuko's soldiers where the same ones he spoke out against sacrificing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe not war crimes but what he did with June isn't great either

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He apologies for that in the comics, though many of the panels feel OOC.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which comic is that one from?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I keep forgetting that they're still releasing new ones. Cheers!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

New novels keep coming too!

The novels are great, TBH way better than the comics.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

100% I really digged the Kyoshi ones and you reminded me to pick up the Yangchen ones again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

A sige isn't actually a warcrime...

load more comments
view more: next ›