this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
426 points (95.9% liked)

News

23151 readers
3093 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know the headline sounds funny, but remember that could kill a diabetic.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Put cocaine back in it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This was orange juice not coca cola zero (the headline is misleading)

If i have to guess the gymnic was that they add zero additional sugar (but oranges still have sugar).

While I hate these misleading names and i am in favour of this kind of actions; i suspect diabetic people are familiar with this BS and would have read the nutrition facts

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Lemonade, not orange juice. And no, it was a zero sugar lemonade, artificially sweetened, and they put sugar in it accidentally.

But I agree, the headline should have been worded better.

[–] [email protected] 143 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Coca-Cola has voluntarily recalled 13,152 cases of Minute Maid Zero Sugar Lemonade because it discovered during an internal investigation that cans labeled as Zero Sugar contain full sugar.

Not Coke, it's the lemonade.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago

Could've recalled it for being Minute Maid too.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Minute Maid is owned by Coke. That's why the headline says Coke is pulling the drinks.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Headline could be written better, I warned my friend who's sister is a diabetic before realizing its just the lemonade

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am very tempted to complain about the state of modern journalism, but maybe we don't have to expect better from "simpyrecipes.com".

Still, holy clickbait, Batman.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"simpy" recipes are something else entirely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Better journalistic integrity, weirdly.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

13k cases is like 30 seconds of production 😂

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You aren’t far off. I’ve been in the Anheuser Busch plant in Cartersville GA about 20 years ago and I swear one line bottled 600 a minute…. Remember thinking how it took two of our plants to keep one of theirs going. You couldn’t see the bottles they moved so fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Check the label before you drink it, especially if you're watching your sugar intake for medical reasons.

Umm. How would checking the label help? If the drinks were labelled correctly, there would be no reason for a recall.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 days ago

In this case, they're probably referring to the lot number. The affected numbers are FEB1725CNA and FEB1725CNB for Minute Maid Zero Sugar Lemonade.

If I was told to just check the label, I'd probably also assume they meant the nutrition information. In that case you'd be correct that it wouldn't help you identify the affected drinks because they would be marked as having 0g sugar.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree. The best thing to do is avoid it entirely for now. I'm guessing there are other sugar-free lemonade options. Is Crystal Light still around? I used to like that one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm super fuckin curious now. As a type 1 diabetes since 12y/o, before the 2010's the only readily available 0 sugar drink options were water and diet pop. So for idk 20 years I was raised on DP giggety

Fast forward to the first time I got coke zero from a restaurant when it first came out. I was 100% positive they were putting sugar in it and have not wavered from that unfounded conspiracy theory.

Even more so after every brand of pop, juice, energy drink after that 2010ish decade had its own zero sugar options on the market. Nothing comes even close to the flavor in coke zero. In the absolute slimmest chance this has been a day 1 fuckup they are just catching I still feel like it could be a very small amount cuz that all it takes to give body to a zero sugar drink.

My source for this belief can be found in drinks like Gatorade G2 vs GZero, or new Prime energy drinks I see everywhere now, or another good one is the oj brands who offer half the sugar options of OJ.

You drink a zero sugar drink back to back with any of these example and you will totally get what I'm saying about the empty taste of zero sugar vs the fuller less chemically tasting "low" not "zero" options lisred above.

Then look at the total carbs of the light sugar options to the full flavor all the sugar options and the one with the highest amount of sugar should be the OJ and even that is only 50% of the full flavored OJ.

Normal energy drink: 35-50g of carms compared to 6g of carbs in prime. Gatorade: 36g vs G2 is i wanna say 12ga or go further with Gatorade Fit that has a splash of juice and that is a mere 4g of carbs.

So back to coke zero. It could only take a couple grams per can to get that real coke taste in coke zero. Yes it could cause most diabetics to raise an eyebrow as to why they're sugar readings after a coke zero are slightly higher but the reality of it is you would haven't be on the strictest regiment diet of the same exact amount of portions, recipes and execute your insulin delivery efficiency to perfection rotating sites so the same % of injected insulin is retained for every meal and even then the difference from adding a can of coke zero with 4-8g of carb is barely going to move the needle.

For most diabetic insulin regiments they start you off on a scale of 1unit of insulin per every 12-15g of carbs consumed depending on the person's size, age etc. Way back when they first trained me I was instructed to round to the nearest 5 and take the closest dose of insulin to match. So a single can isn't ever going to ruin someone's night cuz it isnt even enought carbs to round up to take 1 unit on insulin for.

Still doesn't make me any less interested if my bat shit crazy conspiracy theory is actually true. Lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

This wasn't about coke zero but about two batch numbers of the zero sugar version of minute maid lemon aid, in cans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The recall was initiated on September 10…

Yay! An urgent thing that happened over a month ago! I sure am glad that people get timely notifications of these events.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun story, the recent meat recall (the second one) affected some salads I bought early September.. we got an email long after we'd eaten them letting us know, and to call "this number" if you'd like a refund.

Sorry, I lied, it wasn't a fun story.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You should just shit in a box and mail it to them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not quite sure how this would done in a timely-er fashion. Signage in the stores? In theory, anyone paying with plastic could have been contacted through the card company.

That would involve the manufacturer alerting the store, the store alerting all the various card companies, then the card companies alerting the customer. That's a lot of infrastructure to keep running and to do so fast enough that the customer finds out within a day or two of the recall.

Expensive. Worthwhile given the potential to save lives or hospital stays, but you know how companies are.

This would also involve admitting all your purchase history is collected and stored in a way that is not anonymized, which I don't think people would quite like to be explicitly told about.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I never even mentioned alerting individual customers. The publication date on the story is TODAY. We can certainly do better than that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I understood that from your comment. I wasn't contradicting you or challenging what you said, just wondering aloud how we might go about it and pointing out some flaws in my own point.

That said, even if this article was published the day of the recall, I imagine only a minority of the affected purchasers would ever see it. I couldn't say I've ever looked at a recipes website to inform me of important consumer news.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This might possibly be the most civil, respectful misunderstanding I’ve ever seen. I appreciate it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Par for the course with online discussions, I'd say. Always difficult to discern the tone of a comment when it's written down. No harm done.

Cheers!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

In Germany, supermarkets typically post product recalls right on the doors or over the shelves of the section that has the affected products. I guess if you bought something you might be less likely to go down that aisle again next time and come across the sign, but (barring a big empty space at the entrance) I think that's the most reasonable place for them to be

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Same in Belgium and the Netherlands. On the stores website too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

so they made it taste like shit for no reason

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I see you're familiar with the Coca-Cola company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My favorite zero calorie drink is water.

I feel bad for people's whose stomachs get upset when drinking water, they have to turn to solutions like sugar-free drinks whether they like it or not.

As @[email protected] astutely points out, it's a big deal for a lot of people with dietary issues, diabetics being the most prominent.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I have a hard time believing someone can be sick from water but artificial sweetener in water doesn't cause that. Has to be psychosomatic.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

No, water is really bad if you have unmedicated GERD. I am fairly certain that if I miss a day of meds, the swift intense heartburn is not psychosomatic. I don't know why, but anything with carbonation is much less intense.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it is psychosomatic, but can still be debilitating. i knew a Navy veteran who could not drink straight water at all because while in the Navy, he had to drink several gallons of the stuff every day. as soon as he was discharged (honorably), he found he couldn't have water without anything added to it simply because he had so much of it in the service. of course, he still has to drink water, so he carries around a bottle of flavoring

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

How does this keep happening? Poor quality control. Pepsi had similar earlier this year.

load more comments
view more: next ›