this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
178 points (94.5% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2882 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vladimir Putin has said that a western move to let Kyiv use longer-range weapons against targets inside Russia would mean Nato would be “at war” with Moscow.

Putin spoke as US and UK top diplomats discussed easing rules on firing western weapons into Russia, which Kyiv has been pressing for, more than two and a half years into Moscow’s offensive.

“This would in a significant way change the very nature of the conflict,” Putin told a state television reporter.

“It would mean that Nato countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,” he added. “If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.”

MBFC
Archive

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

“It would mean that Nato countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,” he added. “If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.”

Assuming that the implication here isn't that the appropriate decision would be "Russia's gonna pull out of Ukraine", and it's more "Russia is gonna use nuclear weapons", I expect that it can be added to this list:

https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/a-timeline-of-russias-nuclear-threats-against-the-west-947

A Timeline of Russia’s Nuclear Threats Against the West

I believe that that would be entry #96.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I'd also add that during the very first statement Putin made announcing the invasion, on February 24, 2022, he ended it with what I imagine was intended to be interpreted as a nuclear threat:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_conducting_a_special_military_operation

"On conducting a special military operation" (Russian: О проведении специальной военной операции, romanized: O provedenii spetsialʹnoy voyennoy operatsii) was a televised broadcast by Russian president Vladimir Putin on 24 February 2022, announcing the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Warning against international intervention

At the end of the address, Putin warned other countries against intervening in the conflict, saying:

Whoever tries to interfere with us, and even more so to create threats for our country, for our people, should know that Russia's response will be immediate and will lead you to such consequences that you have never experienced in your history. We are ready for any development of events. All necessary decisions in this regard have been made. I hope that I have been heard.[12][10][13]

I don't have a unified timeline of everyone's activity, but we authorized military aid the next day, so I don't think that the statement had a very extensive deterrent effect.

https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/Support-for-Ukraine/Timeline/

Feb. 25, 2022

U.S. Air Force Gen. Tod D. Wolters, commander, U.S. European Command and NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe announces the activation of the NATO Response Force.

The Biden administration authorizes $350 million in military assistance from Defense Department inventories.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

NATO: staying in Ukraine would put Russia 'at war' with NATO.

Considering your army can't take Ukraine, this really a fight you want to pick?

God, it really is the Russian religion that they're the only strong ones and everyone else is just so spoiled and weak, as your oligarchs tell you, from their mega yachts.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They are both perpetual victims and the strongest kid on the playground at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Which is described in Ur-Fascism by Umberto Eco. It's part of the fascist rethoric.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Russian cultural paranoia.

They cannot consider themselves safe unless they have a 'perimeter' around Russia.

The thing is: that needed perimeter is always growing, eventually your country becomes part of it, ask Poland and later east Germany, Afghanistan, and eventually, your country.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Well Putin, if you don't want a war with NATO, you could always do the responsible thing and get the fuck out of Ukraine and stop launching illegal invasions of your neighbors.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Too late, they already used GLMRS in the Kursk region. Guess we’re “at war” now. I’d argue that’s a laughable position for him to take given Russian agents have been sabotaging European infrastructure all over the place since Feb 22. Letting Ukraine defend itself shouldn’t be controversial.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wait a seconds. Haven’t they said that they are at war with NATO at least since the started the full invasion?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At this point there is no point in beliving in Putin when he talks about red lines. Apparently he would Nuke the shit out of Ukraine if they entered Russian territory but this has not happened after Kursk..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Well, yes. But this time they mean it. It's completely different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Again? Wouldn't that be like the fifth War NATO would enter with Russia, according to Putin?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So many red lines crossed its starting to look like a red carpet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh no, NATO is on the brink of starting World War VIII!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Oh no...anyway

jeremyclarkson.gif

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Doesnt this imply that, for Putin, Crimea and Donbas are not part of Russia? Those have been repeatedly hit by long range western missiles.

Maybe someone should inform the Russians living in those areas that their leader thinks less of them than other Russians.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

His soldiers don't much care for Kursk either. Since they are looting it for all its worth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They can't even handle Ukraine lol, can you imagine NATO?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Not to mention, Russia has been waging asymetric warfare tactics against NATO powers for years. If anything, it's that they haven't woken up to the nature of the conflict.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sounds like a "final warning" to me

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Like twentieth now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

“Two and a half…… two and three quarters……”

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Negotiate the full deal to return Ukrainian, and exit peaceably. Run your stories in Russia "Ukraine successfully denazified, free and fair elections to be held" - "Ukrainian forces defeated at Russian border"...

...then go back to arresting democracy protestors, gay rights advocates, and your own alt-right talking heads... And try to keep your head on Vlad. Try to pick a successors, and a nice European country to retire to.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He will never be able to retire, lmao. He's going to die in one of his bunkers to afraid of being Gaddafied.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Somebody fucking call their bluff already

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They've been calling it for basically the last whole war.

In fact, it's been done pretty masterfully by not making one huge step, but small steps where no single one would force him to do something, but just over time each small step eventually gets to the point where he said he would have to do something...and hasn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency 17 points 1 month ago

Touch the boats. Seriously. Try it. See what happens.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Putler makes veiled threats to use nuclear weapons.

Again. Dude isn't really impressing anybody anymore.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol. Ok. Let's see what little Vlad Puta calls "war". What a scared little bitch he is.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They've been launching cyber attacks at USA for years. Are they not at war yet?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like the previous N times? 😴

Everyone is so afraid

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

The famous paper tiger. :p

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

"Vladimir Putin says..."

Aaand my brain switches off. Another red line.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Another bluff. Also, we can just call it "special military operations".

Also, NATO includes Canada. Not just the US and European countries, like the article says.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Oh gosh, I am so scared. Another Russian red line.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Fucking bring it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NATO should at least shoot down missiles and drones which enter their sovereign airspace. Save Ukrainian lives and structures. Would also be actual experience of shooting down such actual enemy hardware in their own airspace. No simulation, no controlled environment. Would also train their AI for real.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assman 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Keep rattling that saber and it'll fall apart

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

You and what army?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Ok well I guess we're all going to be affected. I propose that blender thing for putin when they get him out of the smokey hole.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let Ukraine use slightly longer range weapons than anything they can prove has been fired by Russia. Every escalation by Russia is permission to use the next tier of missiles to wipe them out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Just let Ukraine use all the conventional weapons.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Is that a shred of concern? Could he lose the war if longs range missiles were allowed?

load more comments
view more: next ›