this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
385 points (92.7% liked)

Today I Learned

17296 readers
142 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The eyes have it: Men do see things differently to women

The way that the visual centers of men and women's brains works is different, finds new research published in BioMed Central's open access journal Biology of Sex Differences. Men have greater sensitivity to fine detail and rapidly moving stimuli, but women are better at discriminating between colors.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 103 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

And most of us absolutely love filling those neurons with images of women

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fine detail and rapidly moving stimuli ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

That explains jiggle physics then

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Hey, I am more complex than that!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Men have greater sensitivity to fine detail and rapidly moving stimuli

Looks at every first person shooter demographic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

ok so, here's my theory. The obvious answer here is that this is obviously "for hunting" or something. But evolution doesn't really work that way.

So my take on this is that this is actually an evolutionary adaptation to the different structure of the male body, as well as it's general abilities, and how they have been used throughout humanity. If men are generally stronger, taller, and faster runners, wouldn't it make sense that the visual processing would be adapted to be more responsive to these use cases?

this seems like the only realistic answer to me. Something about men must be different enough, or at the very least, have been used differently enough at some point in time for a long enough period of time, that it has to have been an evolutionary adaptation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Not sure what your mean by it doesn't work that way

If men were predominantly doing the hunting, women would be more likely to choose a more successful hunter (more likely to pass on their genes if they have a better mate)

Also in general the ones who were better at hunting and their mates would be more likely to survive long enough to have children

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I was thinking it was more to do with dancing, possibly even music. It could even be something really weird.

Usually the way to identify if its about hunting/war or not is to find the exceptions and links: do hunters that perform really, really well have 3x the visual cortex neurons? Is it a socialization thing where doing certain tasks results in higher brain differentiation?

There's a lot of questions

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was thinking it was more to do with dancing

You're thinking of Homo Groovensis, the famous hunter dancerers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Whatever it does, it doesn't seem to help with colors.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Men have greater sensitivity to fine detail and rapidly moving stimuli, but women are better at discriminating between colors.

Literally under the headline.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If only some men used those neurons to read

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Brain one way, but other brain other way. Chemical stuff is making brain stuff happen. Makes see different.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

My wife (presenting me with three identical carpet samples): "Do you like grey with a hint of blue, grey with a hint of pink or grey with a hint of yellow?"

Me: "Trick question?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm curious about this. They say that it's related to in utero exposure to androgens, which means it's probably not as clear cut as XX vs XY, because intersex folk and folk with atypical hormonal exposure (such as fraternal twins of different sexes, with a shared placenta) experience different levels of exposure, and different reactions to that exposure.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

But most things human are regulated by hormones, because of genes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Yes, absolutely. But as I said, it's probably not as clear cut as whether you're XX or XY, because there are other factors that can also impact hormone levels and sensitivity to hormones

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

women are better at discriminating between colors.

Misread this as saying women are better at racism lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Woman can be racist to way more shades of skin color than men

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I've seen multiple people suggest hunting and get correctly told thats inaccurate

But would war fighting, or just fighting in general what with our aggression n shit help explain it?

The only times I've noticed this discrepancy in life are when hunting with women of playing competitive FPS games with my wife watching. I'll regularly see and react to things they don't, and are shocked when I shoot the sniper out of the tree on the other side of the map because yes, I did see him and I'm not crazy when I say I see shit flicker gdi

Aliasing also bothers me more than any woman I know, and everyone I know who hates it as much as me is a man

[–] zalgotext 9 points 5 days ago

Maybe, and I'm not a biologist or an expert on evolution, so take my uninformed opinion with a big ol' chunk of salt, but I feel like what you're describing is more cultural than biological. Like, generally women just play video games (at least online competitive ones where there's interaction between players, like the ones you're describing) less than men, because those kinds of video games are sort of a hellhole for women. So in general, their eyes probably aren't attuned to things like aliasing and digital sniper glints because that's not something they experience often, not necessarily because their brains aren't as well equipped to recognize those things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

So the ladies can check out the men's plumage as they perform a dance off.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

I wonder if that correlates with hallucinations or seizures.

load more comments
view more: next ›