this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
271 points (98.2% liked)

Reddit

17443 readers
20 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Roughly one year ago, you say? Gee, I wonder what could possibly have happened roughly one year ago, hrm? Can't really think of anything particularly memorable that happened roughly one year in the past... [them, OP and all the commenters]

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder what the timeline is before the inevitable selling of data results in users getting doxxed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That is when Reddit starts selling Reddit Premium to not sell all your data, bc fuck all you all apparently, according to spez.

Edit: holy shit that may have already just started.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No controversial has been pushed for 7 years on reddit

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 month ago (1 children)

strategy as old as the day when some corporate ghoul clocked that more engagement = more ad time. facebook is probably the worst offender with youtube being a close second

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you ever browsed twitter post musk (not saying you should)?

But elon musks’ “X” is probably the worst offender here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

post-elon twitter is bad, but both fb and yt overtakes it vastly by having much larger user base

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Read all about it in this month’s issue of Duh.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I miss Norm :/

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's apparently another issue that's depriorotizing "niche" subs in the recommendation algorithm, that some mod claimed was a bug.

It's pretty obvious, they're just prioritizing generic engagement for profit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

When they killed RIF, I went to the mobile site a handful of times. There was crap from subs I didn't subscribe to for a reason on my front page. Super annoying. I stopped browsing at that point, and only go back for niche subs

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

My email is still subscribed to reddit sending me recommendations. It's always the most boring posts of unrelated subreddits that have like 6 votes.

The company is so incompetent it's astonishing.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just like every other social media site. I get redpill BS in my tiktok feeds because I commented one too many times calling them idiots.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Why even use tiktok?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh, so like every other media out there? Using controversial content to incite outrage to get more clicks and reactions?

God I'm so tired of this shit.

News on TV, on the internet, in newspapers, posts on all sorts of social media, it's all the same outrage BS.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember when companies primarily used to try to monetize our happiness and comfort? Doing things like associating their brands with good times and shit?

Never thought I'd miss that hollow hallmark garbage(... is hallmark even a thing still??)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah it's still a thing. They mostly do cheesy movies for white Christian moms now though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, would you say that it makes you feel...outrage?

Excellent. It's all coming together.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The young person equivalent terminology is now "Gyat" which (I'm not making this up!) was reportedly coined by a streamer called YourRAGE. The more you know... (the more you wish you didn't?:-P)

Edit: the (accredited on the wiki page of the word) original origin story.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No it was mor of a "GAAAAHHHH!!!!" and not GYAT DAYUM!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

SHOCKED, I TELL YOU!!1

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (7 children)

yeah now whenever i visit reddit (when i run out of fresh lemmy content) i constantly see things i would rather not. I'm doing my best to limit my "bad news and shit happenings" exposure and reddit recommends i watch all the tragic traffic accidents when people post them to r/maybemaybemaybe, right inbetween the freshest news from the genocide frontlines, and the newest bullshit coming from American politicians

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Funny that someones post got removed for having negative Karma lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm kind of shocked that EA's comment that was heavily downvoted wasn't deleted. I guess EA wasn't paying enough to get that service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Pump the rage into their veins, that's the ticket. Can't possibly go wrong, and even if it does it wasn't us.

OK, maybe it was us but it's not that bad. Ok, it's bad but who knew?

OK, we kinda knew, but that monetization tho!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Downvoting to indicate you're not interested is not how it works (or worked). Same for Lemmy.

*I'm saying that voting doesn't impact your feed in the way of "show me more like this" or "show me less of this".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately so. The original goal of downvotes in the reddiquette used to say that downvotes were meant for posts and comments that were uninteresting/spam and didn't contribute to the discussion, but unfortunately most people use it to shut down viewpoints they don't agree with.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Reddit had, historically, been pretty good about the first few posts in an article complementing or rebutting the headline (particularly when the OP is controversial). Now the degree of fake engagement has made that harder to come by, simply because its hard to procedurally generate a rational set of ideas.

But in more insular and criticism-hostile communities, you'd regularly see a "Fuck <Thing We All Don't Like>" as the most upvoted comment, with any critique or nuance buried under a hill of downvotes. You'll also see some variation of Fed-jacking/Bot-tagging used to rebut any thoughtful criticism.

In fairness, we see it around here, too. People get dogpiled for having an .ml source account. People get tagged as "Russian Bot" or "CCP Tankie" for expressing the least bit of criticism of US/UK foreign policy. There's just an orgy of hate in social media, even in areas that don't explicitly encourage it.

Reddiquette doesn't work when you see in-group shitposts as positive contributions and outsider critiques as inconsequential spam. Doubly so when the mods are pushing a particular agenda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same for Lemmy.

Depends, I use it to signal content that is off-topic for a community. I know it's not the most common usage though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That does not impact your feed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Oh okay, sorry I misunderstood you

[–] blargbluuk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would be nice, I realized recently that a lot of people here will still act that way and downvote your stuff as a disagree/don't like button

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That strategy works so well for Xitter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Oh shit, for real?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

All of those platforms have used that strategy. I think both FARK and Reddit had/have professional trolls on the payroll back in the day to drive controversy and therefore engagement.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's also a (US) election year, which tends to just be crazier than normal. It's possible Reddit is tweaking things, but it's also possible that election years bring out the worst in people. I definitely noticed a change back in 2016, less in 2020 but also COVID made everything weird.

There is also the obvious exodus of users in the past year. I'm not saying it's a lot in terms of numbers, and I'm sure they were replaced, but I suspect some shift in demographics.

Also Twitter. Twitter had a huge rage problem before Muskrat took over, but now it is soooooo much worse. For some reason people don't leave and then I'm sure carry over that rage to other sites.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

They could have banned the russian bots, but they were desperate for their traffic. (Or Spez is in their pockets/did some weird things he doesn't want to be seen)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You could tell they were heavily tweaking their algorithm in 2016 while they were shifting from a list of default subs to an algorithm based selection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I've almost noticed the opposite for about 2 months now - but I only use mobile browser with no account so it may not be a fully accurate experience.

The main reason for this opinion is that I'm Canadian, and until recently the super right wing echo chamber bot farm Canada_Sub, no longer appears on my popular/hot in Canada feed and has been replaced by the far more left wing Onguardforthee.

The 'Sub' group went private, then back to public but it's no longer being pushed on my feed.

In general, I'm definitely seeing less right wing talking points for Canadian content, not sure if that's due to the overall algorithm, or if admins have been cracking down on bots and the right wing Canadian subreddits don't have enough traction without them to crack relevance.

Maybe reddit is taking it's content more seriously with all the AI content scraping they're about now. Their content won't mean squat if it's polluted by bot content like other social media.

[–] DumbAceDragon 2 points 1 month ago

As opposed to lemmy where all the worst takes just naturally float to the top.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, so like every other media out there? Using controversial content to incite outrage to get more clicks and reactions?

God I'm so tired of this shit.

News on TV, on the internet, in newspapers, posts on all sorts of social media, it's all the same outrage BS.

load more comments
view more: next ›