110
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Forgot to mention, apps that at least has a good following and matches in Europe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Yea it's a cool app called meeting people IRL, kinda obscure tho

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Oldschool Runescape

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

No.

Next question.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Grindr. It's only partly shit.

RIP if you're looking for women.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Didn't grindr have recently some shit that they were selling the confidential user data forward?

[-] [email protected] 79 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The hard to swallow answer here is this:

Dating apps, like all apps, are majorly funded by giant companies, because there's no realistic path to scaling up from 100 users to millions of users without a bunch of investment money.

Say I want to create a new, decent app that takes us back to the days of stuff like early OkCupid which was smartly done and actually worked okay.

Well, if it gets any amount of quick adoption, I'll be going from really low costs to astronomical hosting costs almost overnight. Often, the "checks haven't cleared" as they say and while you've technically been paid, it's all waiting in escrow or bank transfers or what fucking have you and you have giant bills falling due and no way to pay them

That's why this happens to every single app under the sun. They're left making tough decisions and selling out to unscrupulous people.

Because what no one wants to admit is that the funding model to how to make almost anything function on the internet at-scale where millions of people use it is fundamentally broken.

I mean fuck, isn't that why we're on the federated splinter-net where people can justify the costs of their small corner of federation, easing the overall load of financial demand?

Corporate internet is broken and they're chasing ridiculously thin numbers to constantly be making more.

So, you'd probably need some kind of federated solution to not have it be destroyed by corporatized enshittification.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

The fediverse as designed is actually pretty inefficient. If it ever were to go to Reddit scale it would melt down.

That's because there's effectively no batching for federation currently ... every single vote from an instance is forwarded back to the instance hosting the community and must be processed individually. So if you get 500k votes on something even if it's from 200 servers, the servers hosting the community have to be able to withstand the flood of votes and store the associated data... And that's just votes.

Worse yet, those votes then get replayed to every single one of those 200 servers one by one. So every server needs 500k vote entries and all the associated traffic ... even if half of the servers are just 1 guy looking at cat videos once a month.

Federating actually is way more expensive than just adding another user as designed.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I'm sure if we reach that point, someone will add a method for batching cross-server communication. That's the beauty of FOSS

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

... Eventually...

Here's a bug on Mastodon that's existed since 2016 that makes small instances unusable. https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/34

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

That's kinda the exact opposite. Not many people want to use small instances, so not many people are interested in fixing something like that. However, let's say lemmy.world becomes unusable because of too much cross-server communication. That would cause inconvenience to way more people, increasing the likelihood that someone will do the work to fix it.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

There is Alovoa, it's FOSS, it's just that nobody seems to be using it. Closest next user is ~10k km away😂

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

And its a gigantic sausage party.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Does that surprise you, given that it's a project out of the FOSS Space?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Absolutely not.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago

Say I want to create a new, decent app that takes us back to the days of stuff like early OkCupid which was smartly done and actually worked okay.

Ok, I WILL say that.

HEAR THAT GUYS??? THIS GUY OVER HERE IS GONNA GET US ALL LAID!!!!

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

Don't deny me a GIF of my man Rodney!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Say I want to create a new, decent app that takes us back to the days of stuff like early OkCupid which was smartly done and actually worked okay.

Can confirm - got laid on OkCupid back in the day.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 3 days ago

If you look good, they all work.

If you don't, they don't.

Seriously, the free tier in every app allows for enough opportunities to match with someone. Whether that happens is really a matter of your looks (or well, the photos you're using).

It's a shallow world out there.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Getting lots of matches is useless when you're looking for a handful of great matches. For that you need a great matching mechanism with thousands of parameters - what OkCupid used to have before Match Group destroyed it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Unless you're match.com where they charge you to like or even message people. Don't ever use Match. OkCupid has been the most genuine one I've seen.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Just so you're aware, Match owns OkCupid now, as well as Tinder, Hinge, Plenty of Fish and a bunch of other smaller dating sites. I don't think they've all been ruined as much as Match yet, but it's probably only a matter of time.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Well this is depressing to learn.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

And one of them (Match?) apparently hsd a decency algorithm that matched people on things like religion and politics, but was disabled after being bought out.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Dating apps have never been my thing but I think this would be a good fediverse project, maybe linked with something like matrix.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Not likely as that is how they make money, lure men in with fake female accounts and make them pay for more swipes, more messages, more prominent messages, read notifications.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

A better question is can a dating app be good?

Around 2010, every tech bro that's creaming shorts over AI today was trying to figure out how to make money behind the fact that everyone had smartphones. But it turned out, that smartphones can't solve every problem.

Dating I would argue, is just one of those things tech made worse. Never mind how often the damn thing fails, think about the conditions where it would function well. A dystopian world where everything is shallow and operating on incel-math.

And how could it be otherwise? Dating apps are just math people trying to solve for love. This is the plot to a comedy movie, not a business plan.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Plenty of Fish and OKCupid were pretty good once upon a time. I used them in 2016 and most of the dates were alright.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

No idea about Europe but Hinge is the one that I've known lots of people have successfully used, myself included, to find a relationship.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I used Bumble to find my now fiance. I didn't pay for it, but also was patient and treated it like an investment instead of expecting immediate results. Ymmv

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bumble is terrible for meeting people. Once you match someone they have 24 hours to respond. I'm fine with the woman needing to message first, but if you don't respond in that 24 hours their match is removed. What if that woman has a life and didn't open the app that day? Oh but you can spend money to extend that window. So if she's on vacation yay you get to buy extensions for a week. It's just a scam.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Women don't even have to message first anymore in bumble, they got rid of their main gimmick. They're just yellow tinder now.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Ah well that's good. But is the 24 hour window still there?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I used the Boo app to find my now fiancee. You can talk with people and it has a quasi social media aspect to it that you can also use to chat with more people, I live in a major city and managed to talk to a handful of people on the time I was there, some of those were started by them too. The chatting wasn't limited iirc it's a friends/dating app.

Granted I was rated 8/10 on the rate me subreddit so take that as you will.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Tried, it sucks.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

There is Alovoa, it's open source, still has a small user base, but you don't have anything to lose...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Do note that, much like for example Telegram or Snapcraft, only the client is FOSS, not the network all the data is stored on.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

That sounds a bit misleading, the server implementation is FOSS too, at any time someone could setup their own instance.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

So it's not really FOSS at all, it's just a loss-leader to draw you into the network, trap your data, and then enshittify and monetize as per standard practice.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It might not be, more than enough people trust Snap and/or Telegram. I'm just putting it out there for the ones that don't feel comfortable with it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I'm holding the torch for OkCupid. I've met my SOs there. Many queer folk, leftists, likes work reasonably well and you even get free "superlikes" once a week. Messages are free, likes are free.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

and you even get free "superlikes" once a week

... are we using the same OkCupid?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

not sure? I got one superlike to use for free a week. is that a regional thing? i have never paid for OkC in my life.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Fetlife if you’re kinky. You gotta use it to find local events with fellow kinky people, meet up, vet each other. Etc etc.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Fetlife is not a dating app. They have actively not implemented features such as filter by age/gender in order to avoid becoming a dating app. If you are looking to get involved in your local kink community, Fetlife is the answer [0]. For anything else, it is garbage. If you try using it to get laid, you will just be pissing a bunch of people off.

[0] At least for my local kink community. Other areas might vary.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
110 points (96.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34309 readers
1802 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS