this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
951 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

11453 readers
476 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 116 points 7 months ago (8 children)

There's an innumerable number of reasons no one showed up, only one of which is that backwards time travel isn't possible.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 7 months ago (2 children)

One of which is that Stephen Hawking threw a lousy party.

[–] brbposting 23 points 7 months ago

Take that back!!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The other one is that most people haven't herd of it, so I doubt the knowledge of this party will travel that far into the future.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Someone who put work and effort into developing time travel will have heard of it. Unless it happened after a complete destruction and rebuild of civilization or two.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Stephen Hawking sent hate mail to future humans so now they don't attend his party out of spite.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It came out in the future that he was a real meanie and no one likes him anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or it was developed by aliens who don’t care about human history.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This makes me think of the red dwarf episode where they find a Time Machine 3 million years into deep space, and use it to go back to the 15th century. They get disappointed and think it failed because they are still in deep space, and Kryten says no, it worked, we are now in 15th century deep space.

They then work out that you need both a Time Machine and an instant space travel machine like the holly hop drive. Especially since everything in the universe is moving.

And so, like, aliens might very well care but can’t find the right intersection of time and space to actually get there. :)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

We're in one of the unlucky few possible resulting timelines in which no one showed. My friend from timeline 3f-1933847.12b told me that their party is still going. Every few hours more travelers turn up with a fresh keg, and whatever their generation's party drug is.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's by far the most plausible but sure, if you ignore Ockham's razor, sure, it's only one of many explanations

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

More plausible than there being rules around time travel that involve not attending parties? I think not.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe future people knew about his supposed ties to Epstein and didn't want to show up...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine if someone showed up and his party became ground zero for a worldwide pandemic of future diseases for which we don't have cures yet?

[–] [email protected] 61 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Hawking gets a Covid sample from a time traveler in 2009 and immediately travels to the Wuhan lab to study it and look for a cure, he successfully delays the pandemic and he almost gets to a cure but a bad guy time traveler comes to kill him in 2018 and without the watchful eye of Stephen Hawking, the world falls to chaos.

I'd watch that movie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They want you to believe that nobody showed up.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

They did not, bc the real party was somewhen else entirely...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hawking concluded it is impossible because nobody showed up to his party. Zero thought was spent wondering if it was a party worth showing up to.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, now that I think of it more, I can't see a single good reason for a time traveler to show up at this party. Going back in time to prove the existence of time travel to the past has a very good chance of handing control of time travel away to people who can undo your existence without you ever being aware of it.

Even if you just wanted a conversation with one of the brilliant minds in physics, it would be smarter to pick a random lecture or non-time-travel-themed party.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Yes, or someone did show up despite knowing the risks because they trusted Hawking to understand the dangers of revealing the secret of time travel and not sharing it with any living soul. If time travel were to ever become possible and somewhat commonplace then the chances are probably close to zero that everybody chooses not to attend this party (assuming the invitation remains famous for long enough). Perhaps the party was crowded with people thinking the same way.

It's much more likely that it all just played out exactly the way Hawking said it did, of course. But it's a fun thought experiment to play around with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong:

I live in a timeline where time travel has not yet been invented. Even if someone invents it in the future and travels to the past to the party, that'd create an alternate timeline where the party is attended and civilization leaps bounds ahead in glorious post-scarcity, magical socialism fashion.

But nooooo since the timeline was forked at that point, no matter how many people do, in fact, attend the party, I'm stuck in the "strand" of the timeline when no one ever did because time travel has not been invented.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

There's different ideas on how time travel "could" work and one of them is the timeline-split notion upon which you base your idea. In that vain it's solid.

Other ideas are that time travel always results in a loop or that its perhaps only possible under very specific circumstances (ie you can't pick an arbitrary location or time to travel to nor to travel from).

My hunch is that even if time travel were possible there's simply no practical experiment to tell whether you are in a split timeline (and if so how it differs from others), aka it's outside of the realm of scientific // logical inquiry.

If y'all like exploration of time travel go watch the show Travelers some time. It has some interesting premises in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is also the Paycheck method. There is no travel you can only observe by looking through a special "time telescope." Maybe plenty of people observed the party, they just weren't able to physically attend.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

However, IF, your theory is accurate, then you are the prime instance of you. All time travel alternatives are just YOU in another scenario, not different versions of each other, they are all YOU.

That's got to be worth something. 🤷🏻‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Eh, that's more science fiction than actual theory.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago

It would have been really awkward for everyone involved if someone stumbled into his party by mistake and freaked him out.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My theory is, time travel is possible but humanity went extinct before we got to that point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Agreed. We are wiping ourselves out.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Imagine having time travel and wasting it on going to some nerd party.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it wouldn’t be like they waste any time, lol

[–] faerbit 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just because you can time travel, doesn't still mean you don't still age, get hungry, have limited energy to do stuff, ...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

me with the ability to time travel: but I'm tired

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The problem is he only told us when it was, but not where.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

He did divulge the location afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Perhaps the time travellers came back as catering staff so they could polish it all off without having to engage in human interaction.

[–] LaserTurboShark69 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

But you did not, in the future.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I mean when time travel is invented the story will change and we'll be reading about those visitors. Nobody has shown up at Hawking's party yet.

[–] Shampiss 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's the point though. It doesn't matter when time travel is invented, only if it can be invented.

If time travel is possible even 10 000 years in the future someone would almost certainly show up at Hawking's party since they have a time machine.

The fact that no one showed up it's a reasonable argument that time travel is impossible

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Well, it was a party, not an orgy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

[off topic]

"The Big Time" by Fritz Leiber is one of my all time favorite novels. His time travel works on the principle of 'The Law Of Conservation Of Reality." There's only one timeline, and it's possible to change it, but it requires a lot of work.

If you go back and kill baby Hitler, he'll come back to life and no one will remember anything. It takes vast armies fighting thousands of secret battles to change one thing. But when a Big Change hits, look out!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So by the thought of infinite parallel universes though, shouldn't there then be at least some in which someone did attend?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pi is an infinite series of non-repeating digits, and yet you will never find the letter A in pi because there is a 0% chance of the letter A being a digit in a decimal system. By the same logic, infinite possibilities do not guarantee that every conceivable state occurs, if that conceivable state has a 0% probability. As finite beings, it is very difficult for us to accurately distinguish between a 0% probability and a infinitesimal probability, so we end up circling back to "we don't know"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

One the one hand you are correct.

On the other hand... Behold! An A in pi! https://www.spoj.com/problems/PIHEX2/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Haha, I figured it was 50/50 on whether I would get this comment or something about the ASCII representation of the letter A

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

That theory suggest that everything that can happen, will — but even then, things that can't happen, won't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It depends on the type of time travel rules. One theory suggest going back in time creates a branch in the time-space continuum, one where the time travel happened, one where it did not.

With this branching time-space rule, there's one timeline, where no time travellers appeared, and one where they did.

load more comments
view more: next ›