this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
131 points (97.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6376 readers
1349 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nuke 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fine I'll say it. I think our cope cages actually look legit. Much better than the Russian cope cages that look like they were assembled out of mattress frames and duck tape

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...and from shitty brittle Chinese steel.

[–] DannyBoy 10 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] SolOrion 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Cope cages on Western tanks, I think. Russians have had them for awhile but theirs look like shit.

I'm not entirely sure what they're supposed to accomplish, which is what makes it a cope ig. That's going to be irrelevant unless someone travels back to the 80s and steals some HEAT ammo. The tiniest amount of RPG or Javelin protection is my best guess.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

The cage is supposed to detonate the heat round (which both the rpg and javelin have to some extent) prior to impacting the actual armor. There's usually a shaped charge in the round and a stand off with the primer in it that ignites the round at the convergence point of the shaped charge. If you set that off prior to the round hitting the armor it'll just splatter against the armor rather than penetrate it. Some weapons have a tandem charge, that has two shaped charges to help it get through ERA or I imagine cope cages.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Their main utility is to prevent FPV drone attacks, especially with dropped ammunition. At leads that is what I have gleaned.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Cope cages on Western tanks, I think. Russians have had them for awhile but theirs look like shit.

Not just that, look at the sides and front bottom, there's ERA slapped all over it. They gave it both the Cope Cage and ERA treatment, this is truly peak credibility.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

They are called different things. Some people call them cope cages. Others call them turtle tanks.

In all, the idea is that if you have one of these meshes, drones cannot drop ordinance inside of the tank.

Unfortunately, it is not recommended to do this, as a bigger target gives your position away.

Some of the equipment or escape vectors are blocked off.

But it also does nothing extra to protect the tank from the impact of Javelin missiles, or a tank round, a Bradley auto cannon. Or even from a drone that detonates over it.

Though most drones don't aim for the mesh, but the back of the tank, the tank tracks (Wheels), or the base of the turret which are the weak points.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Anti drone caging or "cope cage"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I’m going to upgrade this from cope cage to rationalizing rig.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It might look weird but they do work. Since Ukraine was low on conventional anti tank ammo they started using a lot of drones as the only way to take down tanks.

This is protecting the most vulnerable parts of the tank from RPG warheads commonly used on kamikaze drones by having them detonate further from the body of the tank. Now more drones are needed per tank to take it down.