this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
123 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19150 readers
1601 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The NRA has a deep hold of Republicans and primaries anyone who goes against them. Same with AIPAC and Democrats. The corruption runs deep.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

AIPAC also donates to hundreds of Republicans. They don’t discriminate when it comes to corrupting Congress.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Their entire raison d'etre is bribing American politicians to always favor a foreign country, though. That's textbook foreign interference.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Keep your eyes out for Delta Defense LLC and National Shooting Sport Foundation as well. Those two pro-gun groups far exceeded the NRA in contributions last year.

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=Q13

[–] wildbus8979 -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

While that's true, only one of these two groups is essentially foreign interference.

[–] eestileib 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The NRA laundered millions from Russia in the leadup to 2016.

[–] tja 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Then they were wrong about AIPAC.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope, both are. AIPAC coordinates with the Israeli government and its sole purpose is making sure that the US keeps sending billions in aid and weapons no matter how many crimes against humanity are committed using those same weapons.

[–] wildbus8979 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes I was talking about APAIC. The NRA is fully homegrown.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] wildbus8979 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Wow $2,500! That's like a percentage of the... Let me check my notes here... $256,000,000 in revenue. Really significant. Totally relevant foreign interference.

Yeah fuck trying to wash away American fascism as some sort of foreign interference. It is fully homegrown. It would still exist if American society was surrounded by vacuum.

On the other hand, APAIC exists solely to support a foreign state. And laws were changed specifically to allow them to do that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

First of all, the 2500 was just what they'd initially admit to. If you read on just a tiny bit, you'll see this:

The NRA later said that it had received more money from two Russian nationals previously disclosed, including Alexander Torshin, a Russian banker, with links to the Kremlin.

At the time, Torshin was under an FBI investigation into whether any Russian money was funneled through the NRA to help Donald Trump in the 2016 election.

Second of all, I'm not trying to whitewash American fascism. That they're cooperating with Russian fascists makes them WORSE and also more hypocritical for all their bigotry that they call patriotism.

It would still exist if American society was surrounded by vacuum.

Not true. If American society was surrounded by a vacuum, everyone would suffocate, including the fascists.

APAIC exists solely to support a foreign state. And laws were changed specifically to allow them to do that.

No argument there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

My brother in leftism, it can be both. They can be homegrown fascists that are in bed with Putin.

If you seriously don’t think the NRA is a Russian proxy, you have not been paying attention at all.

A dozen senators don’t fly to Moscow on the 4th of July to courier a handwritten letter to Putin just for fun.

Russians hacked both Dems and Repubs and yet only released the Dem files.

Along with the literal thousands of other blatant links between them.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No surprise there. They own half the politicians in this country. Bought and paid for with your tax dollars. What a fucking disgrace.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

AI is already doing enough to make things worse. LLMs don't need their own PAC

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

🤔

Sooo who waaants to start an organizational institution that helps any qualified individual step up to try and get elected to a seat? Minimal funding. The entire point, apart from actually landing the rare seat, is to drain quite literally as many resources from the more malicious organizations. Such as the one mentioned.

I'm certain there are better ways, though this one comes with the added benefit of giving you permission to cackle maniacally with your pinky up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Get Israel's money out of our politics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former US Capitol police officer Harry Dunn has lost his congressional primary election in Maryland, after a pro-Israel group spent millions of dollars supporting another Democrat in the crowded race.

Dunn, a first-time candidate who gained national attention after publishing a book about his experiences protecting lawmakers during the January 6 insurrection, lost to state senator Sarah Elfreth in Maryland’s third congressional district.

Elfreth raised roughly a third as much money as Dunn, bringing in $1.5m, but her candidacy received substantial outside financial help from the group United Democracy Project (UDP), a Super Pac affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac).

In March, UDP suffered a defeat in California’s 47th congressional district, where Democrat Dave Min advanced to the general election despite the Super Pac spending $4.6m against him.

However, fellow candidate and labor lawyer John Morse, who received the endorsement of senator Bernie Sanders, made his support for a ceasefire in Gaza the focal point of his campaign.

In a statement to the Guardian last week, Dunn framed the infusion of Super Pac money into the race as a threat to democracy and an insult to the legacy of Sarbanes, who made campaign finance reform one of his top priorities over his nine terms in Congress.


The original article contains 645 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

no cops in congress please.

[–] Willy 2 points 6 months ago

while the two events in the headline are truly sequential, I have my doubts they are related.