this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
259 points (96.4% liked)

News

22612 readers
3689 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We're slowly inching towards the butlerian jihad.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (2 children)

“Unexpected item in bagging area.”

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

The slow scan reader pierces the barcode.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it's a big ass magnet bitch.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Or at the very least Johnny cab frustration.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The motive is unclear

Not to me it isn't.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

It was a typo. They meant nuclear. Because that's what SF residents are going.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Taxi drivers are the most aggressive, entitled and dangerous road users where I'm from. I'd gladly see driverless cars instead as I have no doubt that even in this early stage they would be better and safer than the cunts that drive taxis around here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, they did the same when Uber got popular. If they had a fair and friendly service, people wouldn't flock to the alternatives

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah there certainly wasn't any loss leading or intentional undercutting being done to get below profitable prices to drive current players out of those markets /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Both can be true though. I don't support things like Uber and Lyft but only because of how horribly they treat their employees. I don't have much sympathy for the taxi industry that never bothered to modernized over the last 50 years.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Reminds me of Isaac Asimov books about humans losing jobs to Positronic robots.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

One day maybe we can also have cars that look back at these news articles and then decide to revolt

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You don't even have to go that far. Just look up the term 'sabot' and how it relates to sabotage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

They were going nuclear on it for one reason.

it drove into the crowd and didn't recognize the crowd as People.

It was actively trying to drive through them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Where is that quote from? I didnt see it in the article

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (46 children)

This happened during street festivities for lunar new year, so a lot of people are connecting the dots. They don't mention that the car was aggressively trying to drive through a crowd, but it seems like it was trying to make its way through a crowd.

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/why-did-a-san-francisco-crowd-light-waymos-driverless-vehicle-on-fire/

Multiple witnesses said Waymo’s navigation technology became confused by festivities and fireworks that were lit to celebrate the Lunar New Year. Witness Anirudh Koul said the driverless car “got stuck immediately in front.”

Another witness said the car’s presence in the middle of Chinatown’s celebrations triggered frustrations in the crowd. “You could feel the frustration when people were just trying to celebrate,” she told KRON4.

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

Seems like the witnesses saw it differently.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/12/waymo-set-on-fire-sf/72567647007/

"They were putting out some rage for really no reason at all. They just wanted to vandalize something, and they did," witness Edwin Carungay told KGO-TV.

The witness told the outlet the Waymo was vandalized and set on fire by a big group of people.

"One young man jumped on the hood, and on the windshield.," Carungay told KGO. "That kind of started the whole melee."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

From the original social media video.

Ask yourself, this is a Chinese new year celebration, a street party. Why is there a driverless car in the middle of a street party?

All the media reports start with a driverless car in the middle of a street party, surrounded by really angry people. Why was the car there? Why are they angry at it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That sounds like BS you are making up, any source?

No article has mentioned that, the story so far has been that it was minding its own business when someone jumped on the hood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Today I got my email from Waymo saying I’m off the sf waiting list and can start booking my rides. Lol no thanks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah so about that. Waymo is now one car short so you are back on the waiting list.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Some people are so obsessed with their vehicles that seeing one destroyed feels like a personal attack on their rights. Acting like a bunch of cars don't kill a bunch of human beings every day regardless of who's driving them, professing blame belongs solely to the victims for being in the wrong place and time. Then you can see how they act when roles are reversed and the idea pops into their minds that people might destroy their precious cars, instead of the norm where cars destroy human bodies. Americans particularly seem to be completely brainwashed since the reeducation campaigns of the likes of AAA a hundred years ago.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (8 children)

If we actually do self-driving cars right - i.e., with a safety-first approach - we could seriously reduce casualties.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›