600
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A judge ordered Wednesday that a trial be held next month to determine whether a Black high school student in Texas can continue being punished by his district for refusing to change a hairstyle he and his family say is protected by a new state law.

Darryl George, 18, has not been in his regular classroom in Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu since Aug. 31. Instead, he has either been serving in-school suspension or spending time in an off-site disciplinary program.

His Houston-area school district, Barbers Hill, has said George’s long hair, which he wears in neatly tied and twisted locs on top of his head, violates a district dress code that limits hair length for boys. The district has said other students with locs comply with the length policy.

...

In the ad, Poole defended his district’s policy and wrote that districts with a traditional dress code are safer and had higher academic performance and that “being an American requires conformity.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 143 points 5 months ago

districts with a traditional dress code are safer

Trying to wrap my head around the concept of “dangerous hair.”

[-] [email protected] 125 points 5 months ago

"traditional dress code" seems like code for white people in this case.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

Clearly it's the hair that's the problem with their culture, and not the generational lack of wealth.

Show me how many black people inherit a house vs whites. Show me how crime rates drop in areas where more homes are owned outright, with no rent or mortgage.

Nah, it's probably the hair.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

the generational lack of wealth

Technically correct, but (inadvertently) misleading because some who don't click the link might assume it's their own fault for failing to save.

To be clear, what we're really talking about here is generational theft of wealth by institutional racism.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The concept of "just save your money and you'll be rich" is so fucking stupid.

You can't save what you don't have, so you have to be comfortable enough to have disposable income and to have enough disposable income that you're not completely giving up on any daily or weekly pleasures to make your poverty-stricken life any less of a pain.

God forbid you want to grab a coffee from somewhere because you work 12 hours a day 6 days a week just to pay your bills. "YoU ShOuLd Be SaViNg ThAt MoNey!"

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Which leads into how we're fucking up with wealth disparity and tax structure and capital gains.

It wouldn't take them ten generations to catch up if payroll taxes were less than capital gains. It wouldn't take ten generations to catch up if the top 0.3% paid for our public healthcare instead of us getting fucked by funding our own private healthcare where we're getting gouged left and right. We'd be a lot closer to those ten generations if we hadn't stomped on Tulsa, and didn't take every other opportunity to take advantage of the poor. Enjoy this $35 overdraft fee.

And they'll never catch up because we've dropped the estate taxes to absurdly low levels. 15 generations from now, in 375 years, Jeff Bezos descendents will still be much better off than any middle class family. (Assuming nothing changes.) That's absurd. It's one thing to provide for your children and grandchildren, but at some point your family should have to provide something back to society again, even if your great, great, great, x5 grandfather did invent the wheel.

We're all getting fucked, they're just getting it worse. Their fight is our fight, even if it's just for selfish reasons. You think the cops can't get away with shooting your kid just because he's white?

[-] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago

it's a code word for racism

[-] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago

Countries with gun control laws are safer.
Schools have no business whatsoever in their students' hair.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 85 points 5 months ago

If the student somehow doesn’t win, I’ll have even less faith in the justice system than I already do.

Oh, and this isn’t quite the point, but I’ve seen pictures of his hair from other angles. It’s cool as hell.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

It's fucking Texas. Don't get your hopes up

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 74 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This school principal used "conformity" as an American principle, implying the kid was being anti American or foreign in some way. Black Americans and their hairstyles are just as American, if not more so than that of white Americans, many who don't have roots to this land as deep as that of some black Americans. This is another example of racist, white administrators, who think that only a white American is a true American.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

Gotta love treating the descendants of people who were brought to America by force as foreigners.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A conversation circa 1780:

"Get out of our country, you don't belong here!"

"You brought me here against my will, motherfucker."

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I love the "go back to Africa" assholes. It's your ancestors who took them from there in the first place, motherfucker.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago

This is utterly ridiculous and such a thinly veiled racism. It's disgusting that a school principal and members of the school board collectively want to punish this kid so badly for being black they'd go to court to do it.

If there's a go fund me or other fundraiser for court costs for this kid and his family, I'd gladly throw money at it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago

Being an American requires respect of others, originally different religions, and now encompass race. Who still cares about hair style as long as it isn't whipping in someone else's face.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Looks like you drank the propaganda lol. Being an American is about bombing brown children for oil.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago

it's incredible there are still guys who act like a grade school dress code is some sort of sacred biblical text. just really makes your skin crawl. imagine believing in something like that. imagine taking time out of your day to punish someone over their hair and thinking you're a noble servant of the barber's hill tradition. what the fuck dude

oh and also the virulent racism

[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

imagine taking time out of your day to punish someone over their hair and thinking you’re a noble servant of the barber’s hill tradition. what the fuck dude

When you think "being an American requires conformity" and consider yourself the arbiter of that conformity, it makes pretty good sense. Especially if you are a racist old shitbag.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

My daughter got in trouble in her public middle school for wearing a spiked collar. Now she's in online school and can wear whatever the fuck she wants. She wants to wear spiked collars. Fuck school dress codes.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago

America was founded in a rebellion against tyranny. Conformity was for royalists, who undermined the revolution and some of whom later served as spies or fought with the British Empire.

These people wave flags and pretend they embody American ideals when they’ve never even understood those ideals, much less even made an effort to live up to them.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago

The Revolution was fought because rich men hated paying taxes. The same reason we're on the verge of a second civil war, now.

Ironically, all these conservative "patriots" would have been Tories back in day.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

No taxation without representation.

It wasn't just taxes. It was taxes that were being taken out of their community that they had no say in.

Texas gets more representation in our government than any other state not named California.

And you know where Texas money goes? 60% goes back to Texas. The rest goes to Arkansas, Mississippi, West Virginia, New Mexico, and Kentucky.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago

I hope he wins and sues the school but mainly the principal into the ether. Good for him and his family for supporting him

[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

Sounds like the school needs to conform to the changes of society!

[-] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago

For context, Poole got his conformity idea from looking at the military academies. Barber's Hill is not a military prep school and the Military does not believe being an American requires conformity. They believe target identification and units working together at low levels requires conformity. (So they know exactly what they're going to do and can just execute the mission without input from higher)

This guy is an authoritarian hiding behind things he only pretends to know about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I like that the two people who literally wrote the law the school is currently breaking were at the hearing to confirm that the law covers this

[-] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

I pasted this the other day. For those who missed it, this is what Barbers Hill is about-

https://www.bhisd.net/district/about-bhisd

Explains a few things, doesn't it?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

What a fucking weird thing to focus on for a school district.

Unless of course... They're funded and lobbied by the Petroleum companies... no, that couldn't be it...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

violates a district dress code that limits hair length for boys.

This is a thing?

I'm actually glad they have so many pictures of him in the article. Lmfao, how is that too long????

My hair looks longer than that and it's a standard dude haircut.

I just googled mens haircuts:

https://www.gatsbyglobal.com/en/technique/best-haircuts-men-top-mens-hairstyles-today/images/img2.jpg

https://www.gatsbyglobal.com/en/technique/best-haircuts-men-top-mens-hairstyles-today/images/img10.jpg

https://www.gatsbyglobal.com/en/technique/best-haircuts-men-top-mens-hairstyles-today/images/img11.jpg

https://www.gatsbyglobal.com/en/technique/best-haircuts-men-top-mens-hairstyles-today/images/img15.jpg

Seriously, almost half of these are longer than this guys hair. None of them would be suspended.

Here is the link of the top 70 styles for men:

https://www.gatsbyglobal.com/en/technique/best-haircuts-men-top-mens-hairstyles-today/

There are obviously haircuts for men that are shorter but I wouldn't even put this kids hair, as styled, in the middle of the hair length bell curve.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Yup, Texas schools are authoritarian hell holes.

It's not about the hair length. It's mostly because he's black, but it's also about asserting power. .

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Barbers Hill High School

Well there's your problem right there. With a name like that, they're bound to be very particular about the hair of all of their students for whatever reason.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Lol. The best part is, the name comes from the area being a huge salt dome, which tracks because these school administrators are obviously super salty.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

“Hey this hill is really salty, you know what we should call it?”

“Uhh salt hill?”

“What‽ No, barber’s hill - it reminds me of getting a haircut”

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Seriously, what is offensive about his hair?

[-] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago

His skin color.

Hopefully it's obvious I don't agree with that statement, but at the end of the day, that's what this case is really about.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Hey, it's also about power trips and compliance. "You WILL do what I said" kind of thing.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

You say that as if there's a difference, but really, racism is just a special case of that.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I know. Ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Same people in Texas make fun of North Koreas defined list of hairstyles probably lol

[-] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

violates a district dress code that limits hair length for boys

I get the racism angle here, but isn't this an open and shut case of sexism?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Remember all those immigrants coming through New York being inspired by the statue of conformity.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

If I was the judge for this, I'd get the same haircut as the kid out of pure spite.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
600 points (98.9% liked)

News

21860 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS