this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
304 points (93.9% liked)

News

22595 readers
4196 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new comedy special starts with the quote, "I'm sorry it took me so long to come out with new material, but I do have a pretty good excuse. I was dead."

The voice sounds like comedian George Carlin, but that would be impossible, as Carlin died in 2008. The voice in the special is actually generated by an artificial intelligence (AI).

"This is not my father. It's so ghoulish. It's so creepy," Carlin's daughter, Kelly Carlin-McCall, told As It Happens host Nil Köksal.

The YouTube account Dudesy, which is described as a podcast, artificial intelligence and "first of its kind media experiment," released the hour-long special on Jan. 9. CBC reached out to the producers of Dudesy and its co-host Will Sasso for comment, but did not get a response.

Sasso and co-host Chad Kultgen say they can't reveal the company behind the AI due to a non-disclosure agreement, according to Vice. The channel launched in March 2022.

Carlin-McCall said the channel never reached out to the family or asked for permission to use her father's likeness. She says her father took great pride in the thought and effort he put into writing his material.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 83 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Stuff like this makes me think we’re witnessing so many crimes that we don’t have a names for yet.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You wouldn't download a person!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Some might, I think we’re coming up on an interesting ethical impasse with this tech

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Eh, I think this is just intellectual property right infringement with a side of being an insensitive dumbass and not really that new. Like, how is this any different than someone dressing up in a George Carlin costume and doing their George Carlin impression for an hour? Shouldn't be using George Carlin's name to sell your stuff, but it's not like anyone got enslaved or he dug up Carlin's corpse or anything.

e; I'm not sure if this detail changes anything, but did the AI write these jokes or just do the voiceover work? I was under the impression that it just did the voice and another human wrote the material

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 7 months ago (23 children)

I don't care about the technology. I don't even care if it's funny. It's in terrible taste.

If you have a funny standup set, do your routine yourself. If you want funny topical comedy, there are literally dozens of comedians alive today you can watch right now on multiple streaming services and YouTube.

There is no reason to do this other than to be tasteless.

I don't believe in blasphemy, but if I did, putting words in the mouth of an incredibly insightful genius and presenting it as his words would be blasphemy.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If Carlin himself approved it before dying, I might listen to it. But nope. You said it yourself. Plenty of living talent right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Jay Leno bitched that he was annoyed when someone would put on a comedy album for friends, and 'try to take the credit' for being funny.

This kind of feels like a logical extension of that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is no reason to do this other than to be tasteless.

Greed?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

I'd call greed being tasteless, but I guess we could count it as a second reason.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (17 children)

I don't understand why anyone who was a fan of George Carlin would ever do this... It seems like something someone who didn't like Carlin would do. What was the point?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What was the point?

Money.

Some also-ran hacks who aren't fit to be in the same room as Carlin are using him to make a name for themselves and drive views to their bullshit channel.

It is grift, pure and simple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Boy though I would love to hear Carlin's opinion on all this AI shit. I think he would get a perverse kick out of seeing himself poorly re-created in such a manner, but I also think he would tear to shreds the kind of people who think it's a good idea to use it like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Carlin-McCall said the channel never reached out to the family or asked for permission to use her father's likeness.

I smell a lawsuit incoming.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I hope so. It’s so evil to do this without permission.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interesting concept. I watched the first 10 minutes or so. The video goes to great lengths to clearly describe that this is neither Carlin's voice or jokes. The material is roughly George Carlin-ish, but not great. The AI voice is not quite believable either.

It's not really for me, and also not a crime in my view. Just a weird thing someone did.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly it came off on the level of a pretty decent impressionist. Not quite on Carlin's level, but evocative enough of his patter and sensibility to make me wish it was the real thing, and there were moments in it where I could almost pretend that it was.

Man, I miss Carlin.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It seemed spot-on to me. I'd love to see some double-blind tests done with this, perhaps take an existing Carlin recording and give the AI the transcript to impersonate from. Then let people pick which is which without knowing ahead of time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Standup comedy is meant to be relatable, the best standup material makes fun of the writer's real experiences and/or common experiences of the audience. This is just my hot take, but I think an AI writing standup comedy is and always will be completely soulless because the AI has never experienced anything and is just putting words together that it doesn't even know the significance of, and is doing so purely based on the statistics of how real human standup uses those words. Even with AI acting out standup written by humans, they still don't understand what they're saying and the emotions they supposedly show are still based on statistics. If you find AI standup funny, you have that right, but I personally don't and that's just me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Carlin-McCall said the channel never reached out to the family or asked for permission to use her father’s likeness.

Welcome to the world of posthumous digital slavery!

When a person dies, anyone can do what ever they want with their image and life's work.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (70 children)

Calling this "slavery" is ridiculously overly-emotive. You can't enslave a dead person.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can’t enslave a dead person.

Give the investor class time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If we were able to digitize the mind of George Carlin, and then we forced that digital mind to write and perform new standup material or be tortured, that would be enslavement of a dead person, and yeah, that sounds like something financiers would love

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (69 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Think of how stupid the average AI is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

I just realized Stephen Colbert doesn't own the rights to himself, so there could be that trainwreck soon as well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (23 children)

We really need stronger restrictions on AI usage.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Only for corporate use. Leave the people doing fun non profit parody things alone. Its the people doing this...or stealing someones likenesses to sell a product that need to be regulated

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

this is what I thought about the post mortem carrie fisher scene as well. It feels ghoulish.

The Carlin script is clearly written by people as there's phrases he liked to use to describe power that simply weren't used but it did capture his rhythm pretty well. My guess is they fed the AI with jokes they wrote and had it rewrite them in his style

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I watched it and it was pretty good. Yeah, it's not the same as the real George Carlin but a few of them certainly got be chuckling and resembled reusing his past work in today's context. The video did start off prefacing that this was an AI and not truly George Carlin so nobody would be fooled that it's not actually him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›