this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
703 points (97.6% liked)

News

22595 readers
4128 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The approval rating of the nation’s highest court stands at 40 per cent, according to a new poll

The Supreme Court’s approval rating has plunged to one of its lowest levels yet ahead of a ruling on Donald Trump’s eligibility to run for president.

The approval rating of the nation’s highest court stands at 40 per cent, according to the latest poll released by Marquette Law School on Wednesday.

The latest numbers rival only those of July 2022, when only 38 per cent of US adults said they approved of the Supreme Court and 61 per cent disapproved – just after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 176 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Approval ratings mean nothing to lifetime appointments. Nobody should hold a position forever. If they wanna keep them there for life, then at least make them subject to review every X years

[–] [email protected] 85 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Theres only one way to end a lifetime appointment, so they should worry if it gets too low.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You can impeach them or imprison them too. They only hold their position "in good behavior".

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Given that Thomas is clearly accepting bribes and his wife is using him to further a coup, I think we can safely assume that means nothing, other than a future weapon against a liberal justice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

If you get one in prison then I'm pretty sure they'll get kicked out. Now we just need a Congress with the balls to spend 5 pages defining bribery so the justices can't wiggle out of it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How do imprison someone who has the money, connections, and legal knowledge to appeal the case all the way up to themselves.

[–] Patches 4 points 6 months ago

Duct tape? And a hammer?

As is the solution to all problems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

That would be the end of SCOTUS if they let him sit on his own appeal.

[–] Bakkoda 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what the plantation owners approval ratings were like. We should conduct a study.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

3/5ths of people disapproved

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My wife and I love each other endlessly and agreed to the whole "until death" thing, but we both hold a firm belief that marriage contracts should have an expiration date at which point the couple can step back and evaluate if they want to continue this union. If not, marriage dissolved, bye.

I hear people say that X isn't marriage, but I say that nothing should be marriage and EVERYTHING should have a planned expiration date. Except light bulbs, batteries, and puppies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Kittens, too. Really all baby animals. And most baby humans (also animals, I know. Settle down, Internet).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't see the rabble of the internet coming out in their usual droves to insult you for the babies/animals quip, so I'll do it for you!

What the fuck, you donkey!? Don't you understand how is babby formed??? It happens when girl get pragnent!!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Appreciate it. I was worried the Internet would let me down, there! Glad someone’s carrying the banner!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We really need to get these guys out of the office. Why are we caring about impeaching presidents, we need to keep a close eye, catch them doing illegal shit and impeach the supreme court justices. Obviously hold off until the US has a president that can appoint good, fair judges - I don't believe Trump is capable of that, and Biden is at best borderline capable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There is supposed to be a separation between the 3 governmental branches within the US. Unfortunately, that’s just not reality. Judges should be elected to terms by the people. We are meant to have a government of the people, by the people, for the people. We the people, are the most important pieces of this equation.

We the people, need to push our agenda on the government instead of the government pushing itself on us.

I’m not talking about any sovereign citizen craziness. I’m just saying it’s 2024, I can pay for my groceries with my cellphone why can’t I chose how my tax dollars are spent?!

[–] Corkyskog 3 points 6 months ago

I think we're too stupid to put the hands in such concentrated power. But it may work better if every election we have like 2 judge seats that go into a lower court and then you just cycle them through the Supreme Court on rotation. That way it's harder to bribe a judge and easier to cut them lose if needed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

It surely does mean something. They don't have an army to enforce their rulings. They also can get a whole bunch of new judges in. Finally, if a prosecutor gets their shit together they could end up in prison for bribery. And while they can define bribery however they want, see point one.