533
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

McKinsey said cities could adapt to the declining demand for office space by “taking a hybrid approach themselves,” developing multi-use office and retail space and constructing buildings that can be easily adapted to serve different purposes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 184 points 8 months ago

So what? The market decides what is needed or not. Business need to stop whining, stop with the silly 'return to office' mandates that are killing their productivity and reducing their quality of talent, and adapt.

It's business. Adapt or die.

[-] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago

socialism for the capitalists, harsh rugged capitalism for the rest of us

[-] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago

Socialize the losses, privatize the gains

[-] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago

Damn rent-seekers

[-] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I (don't really) like to imagine how if someone were to invent a star trek-esqe teleportation device that beams people from place to place, how the auto manufacturers, road infrastructure organizations, and a probably countless other industries would be up in arms about their "losses" without realizing how stupid and short sighted that stance would be.

It's like we're unable to outgrow anything as a society without toddler-tantrum-like backlash from those who have benefitted from us being beholden to the current status quo.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

You should look at the history of public transit in Detroit, and trains more broadly in the US. Its the same thing.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I feel @glitches_brew is sooo close to getting orange pilled. While it's not teleportation, we have the technology for high speed rail. Even my weekly commute of ~110km on conventional rail is about the same time as driving and I can get work done/watch videos/sleep instead of focusing on driving!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Most of the people I see commuting by car, at least in America, are also not focused on driving.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I ride a motorcycle and I can confirm.

[-] remus989 3 points 8 months ago

I saw someone eating a bowl of cereal in the driver seat a few days ago. It's terrifying out there.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I’ll take that over the guy watching porn in stop and go traffic on a busy, high speed, narrow road outside Boston…

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Look into the history of Robert Moses and why the bridges are so low in Long Island

Hint: it has to do with busses and racism

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

The Great American Streetcar Scandal comes to mind.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I used to live in a tiny rural town of about 3,000 people, and even it used to have a trolley line. They tore it up when they built the highway, and now the only public transit available is one bus twice a day, and only for people who are disabled.

One of the old trolleys is still sitting next to the fire station, mocking everyone who drives by.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah just like all the astroturfing done on EVs

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The internet largely killed high speed commercial flight.

It should’ve kill the cubical a long time ago. But middle management culture is so entrenched it took a deadly highly contagious virus to kill it.

Teleporting is just one small conceptual step beyond (and unlikely large technical leap) what we already have.

[-] vaultdweller013 0 points 8 months ago

Given that the star trek teleporter most likely atomizes and simply copies the individual. Id have to agree with the auto manufacturers on that.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I don’t think that is settled science amongst the fanbase.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It may not be "settled science" in the series' canon but it's the only logical conclusion one can come to when applied to the real world. That's how all our current information transfer works. It's dissected and a copy is sent bit by bit.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

The argument against it is that if you believe in philosophical materialism, and the transporter reconstructs the person exactly as they are on the other end, then they are exactly the same person as before. They may be "dead" in the medical sense in between, but people do get resuscitated from being technically dead, and we don't consider them to be separate people afterwords. Without invoking some kind of soul that's separate from the body, it's difficult to argue that they are anything but the same person.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

The market decides what is needed or not.

Silly thing. Capitalism only matters when it's good for business.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Business is risk, highness. Anyone who says different is selling something.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And business is always selling something. They'll never admit they're bad for us.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
533 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS