this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
428 points (95.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6669 readers
637 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snugglesthefalse 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well that's why one of the proposed materials is tungsten, the problem with that being that tungsten is a bit heavy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

tungsten darts from space sounds relatively sane already. what the boss of russian space agency came up with is putting pallet of FAB series bombs as a payload of an orbital delivery rocket, but instead of putting them at orbit, using it as a giant ballistic missile. take a minute to appreciate how stupid idea is this: at these speeds explosive provides something like 20% of total energy if not less, and you can't target them really well without good guidance package. if you slow it all down to make aerodynamic guidance easier, you give up the primary advantage which is speed, making it a target for GBAD. all of these bombs would need to survive reentry, and russians don't have IMX

it's not rods from god, conventional FOBS, or anything like that. it's much more stupid: it's rogozhin trying to make himself relevant again

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

heavy is one of the advantages though. kinetic mass in a smaller morr aerodynamic package

[–] snugglesthefalse 1 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, once it's up there then no problem. Still have to convert that energy from somewhere though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It'd be less of a problem if an altitude rail could be set up to deliver the materials to space, but at that point all you're achieving is making it very obvious what you're sending into space since all anyone has to do is watch the cargo that's riding the rail into low gravity orbit

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gram of tungsten has a mass of something like 15 grams

I'm referring to Rogozhin's idea of putting FAB-500s as a payload, boompaste doesn't tolerate such conditions

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A gram of tungsten weighs 15 grams?

That's not... how... weight works.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Gram of tungsten has a mass of something like 15 grams.

Yeah, probably not.

19.3 g/ cm3