this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
47 points (100.0% liked)
sh.itjust.works Main Community
7733 readers
1 users here now
Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Couldn't have said it better myself. I'd expect plenty of these to be deleted, but if a few of them have some life breathed into them that's even better.
Why delete them at all? Someone could still find them. And even if not what's the harm?
It's a good question and the answer isn't set in stone.
There's certainly no rush in deleting them or anything, which is not the plan if there's content in it.
The main thing here is we'd rather have at least one mod for every community.
I said delete, which was more hypothetical than anything... but there are different Lemmy terms with different meanings:
Honestly, what happens to abandoned, empty communities would likely be a case by case thing.
If there's literally nothing in it, purging could make the most sense.
If there's old content and subscribers, but otherwise just stale, it would likely stay untouched.
Why touch these at all then?
It's mostly white noise in the way of people searching for communities with content to subscribe to.
Makes sense to me. Thanks for the transparency.
Anytime
To expand on that: kbin's recent struggle with spam provides an example of what can happen when there are too few moderators. Many kbin communities have no moderators aside from the site admin, who already has too much other stuff to do. Spreading the work among many people means that objectionable content is addressed more quickly. In my opinion, that's the big reason to either find mods or remove un-moderated communities.
As an aside, I hear that Ernest is actively working on addressing kbin's immediate issues, which is wonderful news.