this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
533 points (88.6% liked)

Curated Tumblr

3957 readers
3 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):

-web

-iOS

-android

Please begin copied raw text posts (lacking a screenshot that makes it apparent it is from Tumblr) with:

# This has been reposted here to Lemmy as part of the "Curated Tumblr Project."

I made the icon using multiple creative commons svg resources, the banner is this.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is why "/s" was invented, no matter how silly it might seem.

Because human skulls are thick af.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're actually quite thin, like a shark's smooth skin.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's the brain that is smooth tbh, not the skin

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe it's actually very scratchy. Like sandpaper.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No no you're wrong, every surgeon I know said it's smooth as silk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I use human brains to finish off my woodworking. They're very coarse, like sandpaper

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Skin as thin as their skulls are thick.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No, they're thick from all angles.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

It's funnier this way.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

After a commentor stated that Planned Parenthood only uses a tiny bit of their budget for abortions, I linked this:

https://www.theonion.com/planned-parenthood-opens-8-billion-abortionplex-1819572640

The number of lemmings who thought I was serious... jesus.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The fuck? This is completely messed up. I cannot agree with the bullshit "facts" stated in this article. 8 billion only netted 8 million terminated unborn lives? Almost $1000 per is definitely not "efficient."

Lemme know when you get below $100 per.

[–] Klear 3 points 1 year ago

So far I feel like people here are a tad more gullible than reddit ever was. Didn't think it was possible.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m old enough to have been an adult when the internet was first opened up to the general public. I remember guides to writing email that stressed that you should be careful using irony or sarcasm, that the tone was very difficult to convey. I don’t know what it could be, but there seems to be something about online communication that makes it next to impossible to use such devices.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s because sarcasm is usually indicated with vocal intonations, which is lost in text.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure, but for some reason there doesn't seem to be the same difficulty in print. I don't recall any warnings about the use of sarcasm or irony in style guides before the internet era, and no one seemed to feel the need for anything like "/s".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That’s a really good point. I would guess that this has to do with how the medium of the internet makes it more difficult to detect the author’s intent. Pre-internet, most writing was read from books, newspapers, and magazines. With each of these, the reader usually has a good idea of the author’s tone. Going in, the reader is usually familiar with the subject, and I’m guessing that longer texts give the reader more time and context to detect the tone.

This is all pretty different on the internet, where shorter, user-generated content (mostly written by people who aren’t amazing writers) reigns supreme. When reading comments in a thread or flipping through posts, the reader switches between different authors with their different tones much quicker than in earlier mediums. It makes sense that people would get tripped up more often.

That’s all just ideas, though. I’d love to see some scientific study on this kind of stuff.

[–] Murdoc 2 points 1 year ago

"Oh sure, that's a great idea." he said sarcastically.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Lack of nonverbal queues/tone and lack of context. It's easier to convey sarcasm through text if you're chatting with someone you know well. But online, you're often talking to near strangers, and you don't know if they're the type to find this kind of thing hilarious among other beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

/s takes any grain of humour of of everything. Ambiguity is an important part of communication.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well that's a stupid little take, you must communicate in exhaustive detail while on the internet. It's in the rules!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that /s was outlawed by the internet elders in 2021.